Meengla
Elite Member
Chiang Kai Sheks nationalist losers rule Taiwan. They haven't done too badly either.
Small country with a lot of American backing. Try China mainland of 1949 under them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chiang Kai Sheks nationalist losers rule Taiwan. They haven't done too badly either.
Yes, that's India's magic sauce otherwise I don't think Indians are particularly smarter or more efficient than Pakistanis. But Indians have managed power politics much better than Pakistanis have and the fruits are there to see. Similarly, the stability and focus under Hasina considerably helped Bangladesh, authoritarian or not.
The difference between India vs Pakistan is that India believe itself as a superpower and try to act like one. Pakistan has no such delusion. As a result, India got slapped into reality by Trump. As well as by Pakistan in 6:0.
This has nothing to do with anything:Small country with a lot of American backing. Try China mainland of 1949 under them.
So are you against India’s parliamentary style democracy and common law imposed by British. Nothing in it is Indian. India copied everything. Unless India figure out a system that works for its religious and caste system, it will always fail.@r3alist bro
I am not for a moment suggesting that IND/PAK/BD can catch up with PRC. But all these countries can be better countries than they are today- they can be the sort of countries where a large %age of citizenry (say 90%) can take roti, kapda, makaan, water, sanitation, basic education and healthcare as a given.
We must build our own nations based on what our citizens are capable of and comfortable with; rather tha mindlessly import models either from the West or from China.
Regards
Chiang is not a Jeffersonian democratic leader. He is just a weak wannabe. Taiwan advanced not because of democracy. But dictatorship for 40 years.'The Chinese' were the victorious Communist Party of China against the 'Nationalists' losers of Chiang Kai Shek. If the latter had succeeded then China would probably be just another wanna-be Jeffersonian Democracy with deep inefficiencies and divisions and still much poorer then now.
He wasn't even a wannabe. He was a typical Chinese ruler who had little ideology but was cunning in playing faction games.Chiang is not a Jeffersonian democratic leader. He is just a weak wannabe. Taiwan advanced not because of democracy. But dictatorship for 40 years.
Of course it is valid. But does that make it right is the real question? Companies are beholden to their shareholders and they will do what they must to protect the bottom line.@AZ_HighCountry
AZ Saar,
A third was pretty blunt: cost driven hiring. He was able to ire H-1Bs cheaper than an American with identical skills and qualifications.
That seems a very likely explanation. And a very valid one. Don't you agree, Saar?
Regards
He is at best a warlords that existed at the time or anytime between the transition of dynasties.He wasn't even a wannabe. He was a typical Chinese ruler who had little ideology but was cunning in playing faction games.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.