Israel’s Genocide in Gaza | 2023- till present
- Thread starter Ali_Baba
- Start date
- Status
Musings
Administrator
Reuters are telling us the Israeli are not sending a peace delegation to Qatar tomorrow so it’s not looking good is it?
What would you regard as a fair investigation sir?
Falcon29
Elite Member
Israeli policy is to keep Palestinians confined to a open-air prison. Netanyahu wants to kill/expel all Palestinians. At this rate, all Palestinians will have been mercilessly killed off within a year. In the UK, their prime Minister was forced to resign over attending a party during covid lockdowns. Yet, it appears, when it comes to Israel, Netanyahu is master over all the West and can do as he wishes:
..
..
Occupied Palestine: Al-Masdar to Al-Mayadeen: Netanyahu does not want any negotiations leading to an agreement that guarantees complete withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, the return of the displaced, shelter and reconstruction, the opening of the crossings and breaking the siege.
..
..
Occupied Palestine: Al-Masdar to Al-Mayadeen: Netanyahu does not want any negotiations leading to an agreement that guarantees complete withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, the return of the displaced, shelter and reconstruction, the opening of the crossings and breaking the siege.
Khansaheeb
Elite Member
Genociders giving food , what's the point?
Get Ya Wig Split
Trusted Member
Why didn't you watch the video? The guy in the video says that the incident will be investigated by 'an independent, professional, and expert body.' Unless you think Hamas should investigate what happened, then it would be okay?
Why not believe Israel if they provide all the evidence and footage? It was similar to that incident with the hospital when the mainstream media immediately accused Israel until Israel proved with footage and intercepted conversations what really happened.
Israel has been publishing videos and documenting everything from the beginning. Remember, Hamas doesn't need any evidence, and whatever they say we must take it as the absolute truth. Right?
Falcon29
Elite Member
There's essentially no diplomatic effort by Muslims and Arabs to stop the war on Gaza. It appears me to all of them are hoping to place Gaza in dire situation without coming to their help to get Hamas to surrender. Even privately, I believe it's in interest of Iran axis as well. Getting rid of Hamas means they can all secure their agendas in the region for the long term without Hamas disrupting it by making the focus be the Palestinian cause.
So, we have 16,000 Muslims fighting for dignity of Arabs and Muslims, and Islam. And we have liars and munafiqs actively hoping this small movement disappears into history. That's wild.
Muslims will probably be killed in masse with rest of humanity in divine punishments as only small percentage within them deserve support from God. Probably Muslims with Jesus will be few around tens of thousands.
So, we have 16,000 Muslims fighting for dignity of Arabs and Muslims, and Islam. And we have liars and munafiqs actively hoping this small movement disappears into history. That's wild.
Muslims will probably be killed in masse with rest of humanity in divine punishments as only small percentage within them deserve support from God. Probably Muslims with Jesus will be few around tens of thousands.
clutch
Elite Member
Khansaheeb
Elite Member
Why are they sending ships to be sunk knowing they can cause environmental disasters?:-
Fears of environmental disaster rise as ship sinks after Houthi attack© U.S. Central Command/AP
A cargo ship sank in the Red Sea after an attack by Houthi militants, taking some 21,000 metric tons of fertilizer down with it, posing a significant environmental risk to one of the world’s busiest waterways and the home of many coral reefs.
The Rubymar was struck by an anti-ballistic missile fired by the Iranian-backed Houthis on Feb. 18 and sank early Saturday after “slowly taking on water” since the attack, U.S. Central Command said on social media early Sunday local time.
“The approximately 21,000 metric tons of ammonium phosphate sulfate fertilizer that the vessel was carrying presents an environmental risk in the Red Sea,” Centcom said, adding that the ship “also presents a subsurface impact risk to other ships transiting the busy shipping lanes of the waterway.”
The ship’s sinking “will cause an environmental disaster,” the Yemeni government said in a separate statement.
The Houthi attack last month caused an 18-mile oil slick and forced the crew to abandon the ship. The Djibouti Ports and Free Zones Authority, which coordinated the rescue of the Rubymar’s crew members, said the fertilizer onboard was classified as “very dangerous.”
It is believed to be the first time a vessel has been completely taken out by a Houthi strike. For months, the Houthis have been using missiles and drones to attack commercial and naval vessels traversing the Red Sea in protest of Israel’s war in Gaza.
The Rubymar founders off the coast of Yemen on Tuesday.© -/AFP/Getty Images
“Yemen will continue to sink more British ships, and any repercussions or other damages will be added to Britain’s bill,” the Houthis’ deputy foreign minister, Hussein El-Ezzi, wrote Sunday on X.
However, a spokesperson with Britain’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said the Rubymar was not a British ship, but was operated by a Lebanese company, flagged to Belize and owned by a company registered in the Marshall Islands.
Related video: Houthi rebels launch missiles at British cargo ship SINKING vessel (Daily Mail
Mail
Houthi rebels launch missiles at British cargo ship SINKING vessel
“We have been clear that any attacks on commercial shipping are completely unacceptable, and that the UK and our allies reserve the right to respond appropriately,” said the spokesperson, who also noted a high level of concern about the potential environment effects of the sinking.
Julien Jreissati, the program director at Greenpeace Middle East and North Africa, called for emergency response teams to be given “immediate access” to the site.
“As well as any further leaks of fuel oil from the engines, the sinking of the vessel could further breach the hull, allowing water to contact with the thousands of tons of fertilizer, which could then be released into the Red Sea and disrupt the balance of the marine ecosystems, triggering cascading effects throughout the food web,” Jreissati said.
“This disruption could have far-reaching consequences, affecting various species that depend on these ecosystems and, in turn, potentially impacting the very livelihoods of coastal communities.”
The Associated Press cited Ian Ralby, founder of maritime security firm I.R. Consilium, as saying that there were “many ways” the Red Sea could be harmed by the ship’s sinking and noted that if the ship remains intact underwater, the impact will be a slow trickle instead of a massive release.
Ralby noted that the sea has a circular water pattern, adding: “What spills in the Red Sea, stays in the Red Sea.”
The Rubymar was heading to Belarus from the United Arab Emirates when it was targeted, The Washington Post reported at the time. The British military’s United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations confirmed in an update Saturday that “the vessel has dragged anchor … and is down by the stern.”
A satellite image shows the Rubymar in the Red Sea on Friday.© Maxar Technologies/Reuters
The Houthis have said that ships linked to Israel or heading to its ports are legitimate targets, and the United States and Britain have launched several strikes against the group in an attempt to end the attacks — which do not appear to have stopped. On Saturday, Senior Houthi official Mohammed Ali al-Houthi slammed U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak for Britain’s support of Israel and said Sunak was “responsible” for the ship’s fate. He also demanded that more humanitarian relief be allowed into Gaza.
Many large ships — which carry some 12 percent of all world trade — have altered their routes to avoid the Red Sea amid the Houthi threat, opting to travel the long way around southern Africa instead.
Such detours could add as much as a month in transit time, delaying the delivery of goods and further disrupting international commerce — a sector already grappling with the aftermath of the coronavirus pandemic, rising inflation and disruptions caused by Russia’s war in Ukraine.
“With fewer and fewer container ships to target, the odds of another spill with massive environmental impact has increased enormously,” Ralby told the AP.
Who are the Houthis, and why are they attacking ships in the Red Sea?
Victoria Bisset, Helier Cheung, Mohamad El Chamaa and Bryan Pietsch contributed to this report.
Fears of environmental disaster rise as ship sinks after Houthi attack© U.S. Central Command/AP
A cargo ship sank in the Red Sea after an attack by Houthi militants, taking some 21,000 metric tons of fertilizer down with it, posing a significant environmental risk to one of the world’s busiest waterways and the home of many coral reefs.
The Rubymar was struck by an anti-ballistic missile fired by the Iranian-backed Houthis on Feb. 18 and sank early Saturday after “slowly taking on water” since the attack, U.S. Central Command said on social media early Sunday local time.
“The approximately 21,000 metric tons of ammonium phosphate sulfate fertilizer that the vessel was carrying presents an environmental risk in the Red Sea,” Centcom said, adding that the ship “also presents a subsurface impact risk to other ships transiting the busy shipping lanes of the waterway.”
The ship’s sinking “will cause an environmental disaster,” the Yemeni government said in a separate statement.
The Houthi attack last month caused an 18-mile oil slick and forced the crew to abandon the ship. The Djibouti Ports and Free Zones Authority, which coordinated the rescue of the Rubymar’s crew members, said the fertilizer onboard was classified as “very dangerous.”
It is believed to be the first time a vessel has been completely taken out by a Houthi strike. For months, the Houthis have been using missiles and drones to attack commercial and naval vessels traversing the Red Sea in protest of Israel’s war in Gaza.
The Rubymar founders off the coast of Yemen on Tuesday.© -/AFP/Getty Images
“Yemen will continue to sink more British ships, and any repercussions or other damages will be added to Britain’s bill,” the Houthis’ deputy foreign minister, Hussein El-Ezzi, wrote Sunday on X.
However, a spokesperson with Britain’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said the Rubymar was not a British ship, but was operated by a Lebanese company, flagged to Belize and owned by a company registered in the Marshall Islands.
Related video: Houthi rebels launch missiles at British cargo ship SINKING vessel (Daily Mail
Houthi rebels launch missiles at British cargo ship SINKING vessel
“We have been clear that any attacks on commercial shipping are completely unacceptable, and that the UK and our allies reserve the right to respond appropriately,” said the spokesperson, who also noted a high level of concern about the potential environment effects of the sinking.
Julien Jreissati, the program director at Greenpeace Middle East and North Africa, called for emergency response teams to be given “immediate access” to the site.
“As well as any further leaks of fuel oil from the engines, the sinking of the vessel could further breach the hull, allowing water to contact with the thousands of tons of fertilizer, which could then be released into the Red Sea and disrupt the balance of the marine ecosystems, triggering cascading effects throughout the food web,” Jreissati said.
“This disruption could have far-reaching consequences, affecting various species that depend on these ecosystems and, in turn, potentially impacting the very livelihoods of coastal communities.”
The Associated Press cited Ian Ralby, founder of maritime security firm I.R. Consilium, as saying that there were “many ways” the Red Sea could be harmed by the ship’s sinking and noted that if the ship remains intact underwater, the impact will be a slow trickle instead of a massive release.
Ralby noted that the sea has a circular water pattern, adding: “What spills in the Red Sea, stays in the Red Sea.”
The Rubymar was heading to Belarus from the United Arab Emirates when it was targeted, The Washington Post reported at the time. The British military’s United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations confirmed in an update Saturday that “the vessel has dragged anchor … and is down by the stern.”
A satellite image shows the Rubymar in the Red Sea on Friday.© Maxar Technologies/Reuters
The Houthis have said that ships linked to Israel or heading to its ports are legitimate targets, and the United States and Britain have launched several strikes against the group in an attempt to end the attacks — which do not appear to have stopped. On Saturday, Senior Houthi official Mohammed Ali al-Houthi slammed U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak for Britain’s support of Israel and said Sunak was “responsible” for the ship’s fate. He also demanded that more humanitarian relief be allowed into Gaza.
Many large ships — which carry some 12 percent of all world trade — have altered their routes to avoid the Red Sea amid the Houthi threat, opting to travel the long way around southern Africa instead.
Such detours could add as much as a month in transit time, delaying the delivery of goods and further disrupting international commerce — a sector already grappling with the aftermath of the coronavirus pandemic, rising inflation and disruptions caused by Russia’s war in Ukraine.
“With fewer and fewer container ships to target, the odds of another spill with massive environmental impact has increased enormously,” Ralby told the AP.
Who are the Houthis, and why are they attacking ships in the Red Sea?
Victoria Bisset, Helier Cheung, Mohamad El Chamaa and Bryan Pietsch contributed to this report.
Khansaheeb
Elite Member
Europeans are funny, sickly timed sanctions at the end of the genocide operation:-
Get Ya Wig Split
Trusted Member
This was to be expected. Do you know who was the biggest donor of humanitarian aid before this war? You won't believe it: it was the US, Israel, and the "Evil West" not Arab or Muslim countries.
Qatar exclusively helped Hamas while the "Evil West" was sending tons of money to the people in Gaza. Did you know that the "Evil West" gave a higher percentage of GDP in financial aid to Gaza than Europe received after World War II through the Marshall Plan?
Why would Arabs help the people in Gaza now when they never did before? Egypt has built three additional walls on the border with Israel in the last 5 months so that no one can escape to Egypt.
You obviously live in some kind of alternative world.
- Status
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
Latest Posts
-
-
UK Racism against Muslims and Brown people: Why are blacks in the UK given a free pass by white english racists? (25 Viewers)- Latest: hussain0216
-
-
-