Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[Baibers_1260]

As long as you are good!

Including the funerals of the S-400 crews . Even better

 

[SoulSpokesman]

@Baibers_1260

At the same time Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh claimed 8 Pakistani planes shot down or destroyed on the ground, with the same "images not required " statement even as he picked nits from his beard.
Indeed, we needn't take seriously ACM AP Singhs claim that IAF shot down 8 PAF planes since images don't exist. Can we extend the same logic to PAF's claims that they shot down 5-8 IAF jets (depending on what Trump has been inhaling on the day) or the damages inflicted on IAF air bases, since no such images exist either.

By contrast satellite images exist of PAF bases being hit by IAF.

Regards

 

[NA71]

New escalation....Indian Navy watching Karachi

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Corax]

@Baibers_1260

At the same time Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh claimed 8 Pakistani planes shot down or destroyed on the ground, with the same "images not required " statement even as he picked nits from his beard.
Indeed, we needn't take seriously ACM AP Singhs claim that IAF shot down 8 PAF planes since images don't exist. Can we extend the same logic to PAF's claims that they shot down 5-8 IAF jets (depending on what Trump has been inhaling on the day) or the damages inflicted on IAF air bases, since no such images exist either.

By contrast satellite images exist of PAF bases being hit by IAF.

Regards

But there is video evidence of at least 4-5 IAF aircraft shot down, the rest can be argued over. In the sat pics put forward by the indians, what assets are shown destroyed in Pak sites? None that I can see, aside from a pothole and some sheds.

 

[NA71]

@SoulSpokesman PAF Air chief today challenges IAF to try another strike and see what will happen to IAF......accept his challenge.....

 

[Baibers_1260]

Can we extend the same logic to PAF's claims that they shot down 5-8 IAF jets (depending on what Trump has been inhaling on the day) or the damages inflicted on IAF air bases, since no such images exist either.

The same logic should have been extended to the MP from Bhatinda Amrinder Singh Raja Warring, who displayed photographs in the Indian Parliament, which he claimed were of a crashed Rafale jet near the Bhisiana Air Force Station in Bathinda, Punjab.
The A4 size pictures he waived in Parliament was of the tail section of a Rafale fighter jet number BS00001 in Parliament.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Baibers_1260]

Indeed, we needn't take seriously ACM AP Singhs claim that IAF shot down 8 PAF planes since images don't exist

Indians don't take their own Air Chief Marshal of their Air Force seriously? That's strange.. Who do Indians take seriously then ?
Arnab Goswamy?

In Pakistan we do take the statements of our Air Chief Marshal seriously.
@Sam6536 @Thinking @Vkdindian1 @Vikramaditya1

 

[TAC]

@Baibers_1260

At the same time Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh claimed 8 Pakistani planes shot down or destroyed on the ground, with the same "images not required " statement even as he picked nits from his beard.
Indeed, we needn't take seriously ACM AP Singhs claim that IAF shot down 8 PAF planes since images don't exist. Can we extend the same logic to PAF's claims that they shot down 5-8 IAF jets (depending on what Trump has been inhaling on the day) or the damages inflicted on IAF air bases, since no such images exist either.

By contrast satellite images exist of PAF bases being hit by IAF.

Regards

So on that basis your AC who made the shameless claims as an afterthought at the end of a talk, claims not even in the official press release, months after the event, is inhaling the same stuff as Trump?
So you’re quite happy with at least 4 of your top jets getting smashed with pictures to prove? Must be such a proud moment for you.
‘Regards’

 

[Falcon26]

I don't why on earth we aren't releasing sat imagery of the ground targets that were hit.

Simple.

Because PAF doesn’t have any as no serious damage was inflicted on Indian bases. Pakistan relied on primitive and easy to shoot Fatah rockets while India used each of its advanced missiles to reasonably good outcome.

 

[Falcon26]

@Baibers_1260

At the same time Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh claimed 8 Pakistani planes shot down or destroyed on the ground, with the same "images not required " statement even as he picked nits from his beard.
Indeed, we needn't take seriously ACM AP Singhs claim that IAF shot down 8 PAF planes since images don't exist. Can we extend the same logic to PAF's claims that they shot down 5-8 IAF jets (depending on what Trump has been inhaling on the day) or the damages inflicted on IAF air bases, since no such images exist either.

By contrast satellite images exist of PAF bases being hit by IAF.

Regards

How many IAF planes were downed in your opinion? And why do you think your military chief said your Air Force was grounded for 2-days and even then on the last day, flew from long range?

Please answer, as I am curious for a genuine Indian explanation.

 

[pakistanitarzan]

@SoulSpokesman PAF Air chief today challenges IAF to try another strike and see what will happen to IAF......accept his challenge.....

Are we being overconfident or its backed up intense training with no room for error?

 

[Thinking]

Simple.

Because PAF doesn’t have any as no serious damage was inflicted on Indian bases. Pakistan relied on primitive and easy to shoot Fatah rockets while India used each of its advanced missiles to reasonably good outcome.

Aha...I thought response was so scary that India had to beg for ceasefire..

 

[NA71]

Simple.

Because PAF doesn’t have any as no serious damage was inflicted on Indian bases. Pakistan relied on primitive and easy to shoot Fatah rockets while India used each of its advanced missiles to reasonably good outcome.

A guess air force primarily responded to IAF strike mission and nutralized S400 batteries on two locations....rest was done by F1/F2/SH15

 

[hasssanali8998]

Aha...I thought response was so scary that India had to beg for ceasefire..

the lost jets and pressure from trump was the scarry part

 

[Thinking]

How many IAF planes were downed in your opinion? And why do you think your military chief said your Air Force was grounded for 2-days and even then on the last day, flew from long range?

Please answer, as I am curious for a genuine Indian explanation.

I don't he think knows. How could he? Did "military chief" in India say that Planes were "grounded" for 2 days? Sounds weird since India is a big country. Why Ground them all over India? Flying from long range is what they were doing on May 7th too! It wasn't far enough, right? I doubt Pakistan did any different. Fly far and stay safe.