Jeffrey Epstein files

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dalit said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
PakSword said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
dbc said:
PakSword, I worry focusing on Modi on this thread will side track the discussion away from the epicenter of the main perpetrators and co-conspirators in our so called 'western democracy'. Considering the majority opinion on this forum is extremely negative of Modi it's akin to flogging a dead horse. If people wish to flog Modi please do so on that dedicated thread. I might even join in.. (y)
Click to expand...

I understand your point but is it not better to keep 1 thread for Epstein files, and not make different ones for Modi or anyone else. Yes we may get sidetracked a little but if he is mentioned in Epstein files which he is then we should be able to share it on here, same with other politicians, the Indians will defend modi sarkar the same way arabs are defending their boys, a few posts above someone shared about IK being mentioned, but this doesnt mean we create a new thread for it. Hope that makes sense.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



Nice to watch again,
Remember Mr DershoWITZ was EpSTEINS main defence lawyer....an ardent proponent of Israel.

This is a rare instance of these sick zionist groomers being called out in person.
 
By now, everyone is west should be aware that's it's Israel which is running this pedo cum honey trap, luring western leaders into their Web. Yet they are still insisting upon waging wars on Muslim lands. Why not all gang up and crush this head of snake once and for all.
 
Persian Gulf said:
the guy who was famously good friends with Epstein cannot be in 'the files'?
Click to expand...
As I said a long time ago, if we are just talking about indictment level (Don't care about whether or not it's winnable) Trumps COULD already be indictedby the DOJ with either a Grand Jury or a Preliminary Action if this was released before he is the President through his connection alone.

There is too much to show he is connected to the circle at least in circumstancial level, including visiting the island, sharing the flight, having girls that was abused and worked for him prior, etc, there are already reasons to believe he either knows something or he is involved in the racket.

On the other hand, such evidence is usually not enough to push for a criminal connection, because it lacks the evidence of execution, which means anything you can see here in the file can be used to explaine EITHER connection or relationship.

And as I also said, this file is for them to use on Epstein, which means Epstein, not anyone else, not Trump, not Clinton, not Bill Gate are the intended target, because if the file show anything that they are involved, their name would be on the title of the file as well, they are not because they weren't the subject of this investigation.

That's why I said many time I don't understand why someone here in this forum or somewhere else would expect this file to contain anything that's "Incriminating" or " compromising" to Trump or anyone else, this file is not called "Clinton Files" or "Trump Files" or "Gate Files" it's called "Epstein's Files" for a reason. But then let's not forget Prince Andrew (I am not going to call him by what he is going by today, it's way longer) was done in by this photo, before all the all 4 and party picture comes out

1769912531183.png

Which is neither incriminating nor compromising, but it reveals his connection to Giuffrey. If anyone is looking to peg Trump with this, they aren't looking at photo where Trump is partying with a girl naked, or a photo like the one time he is spanking the girl with a Forbes magazine as he did with Daniels (Or is it the other way around?, anyway) But what people will be focusing is the connection of the file with him and check it back on him to see if he lied about anything, like how Andrew denied knowing Giuffrey but then this picture stick up in front of him.
 
hasssanali8998 said:
this is such cope out . they cant because all of them are in there .
that is the beauty if this blackmail scheme
Click to expand...
Lol, the people who use that "If XYZ is involved in this, then ABC Party would have released it" excuse were not aware that those names and parties are interchangeable........It's because, as you said, both parties were involved.

Because I can also say if there is anything incriminating on Clinton or Bill Gates, then the GOP would have released it back in 2019.......

Does that mean Clinton and Gates were not involved in this?

But then, it's kind of strange that he himself said there is a Black Fund to pay for sexually harassed women (which seems to acknowledge that fact) and then is very adamant that Trump is not involved. When I first heard this in 2019, I knew straight up that Clinton was going to be represented here somehow, and Trump, well, let's say he has a similar reputation with Clinton. I will just leave it at this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top