Jeffrey Epstein Files Part II - news and discussions

[Hamartia Antidote]

Don't get bogged down with this musk enthusiast.

It was clearly a mossad operation to serve Israel.

I'm sure they are involved..but what does that have to do with focusing on

"Judeo-Christian" vs "Judeo-Christian-Muslim"

Are the Isreali's "Christians too" or something?

Why do the Muslims get off the hook of the Mossad list but not the Christians?

Why the "get out of jail free" card being pulled?

 

[PakSword]

"Judeo-Christian-Muslim"

Lets call it a Judeo-Christian-Muslim-Hindu-Buddhist-Atheist-All-others ring!

 

[Liquidator]

I'm sure they are involved..but what does that have to do with focusing on

"Judeo-Christian" vs "Judeo-Christian-Muslim"

Are the Isreali's "Christians too" or something?

Why do the Muslims get off the hook of the Mossad list but not the Christians?

Why the "get out of jail free" card being pulled?
View attachment 179346

Good question

Allot of my rhetoric on this forum is a re-balancing.

You are smart enough to understand why I'm using the term grooming gang. I'm trying to level the playing field. I'm advocating for fair use of terms.... So, I won't get into that.

As for Judeo-Christian, this is a new term used to emphasise the clash of civilisations and to drive a wedge between the abrahamic faiths. It means the West vs Muslims. That's how it is used, and that denotes its meaning. It is used to KILL.

It is of course a fallacy:

- When did judeo-christian values arise? Was it before or after Christians gassed 6 million Jews?

- Was it before or after Christians drove Jews out from various European states?

-Was it before or after the Alhambra decree, when the Spanish Christians ordered the Jews to either convert or leave with the Muslims, who protected them and gave them their "golden age".

- About that, did Judeo-Christian values take a break when Muslims gave Jews a break from Christian persecution?

-Was it before or after the Christians slaughtered Jews in Jerusalem so as to wipe them out from their holy lands? Or, did Judeo-Christian values emerge after the Muslims captured Jerusalem and brought in Jewish families so that they could once again worship in their holy land?

-And, what do we make of their theological differences? Jews don't accept Christ, we do. Jews belive in the ONE non-triune God, like us. Our scripture honours Mary and Christ, whilst the Jews dishonour Mary and say Christ is boiling in his own excrement.

I could go on and on.....by using that term in the way that I do, I call out its fallacy.

What say you, GOY?

 

[Corax]

Good question

Allot of my rhetoric on this forum is a re-balancing.

You are smart enough to understand why I'm using the term grooming gang. I'm trying to level the playing field. I'm advocating for fair use of terms.... So, I won't get into that.

As for Judeo-Christian, this is a new term used to emphasise the clash of civilisations and to drive a wedge between the abrahamic faiths. It means the West vs Muslims. That's how it is used, and that denotes its meaning. It is used to KILL.

It is of course a fallacy:

- When did judeo-christian values arise? Was it before or after Christians gassed 6 million Jews?

- Was it before or after Christians drove Jews out from various European states?

-Was it before or after the Alhambra decree, when the Spanish Christians ordered the Jews to either convert or leave with the Muslims, who protected them and gave them their "golden age".

- About that, did Judeo-Christian values take a break when Muslims gave Jews a break from Christian persecution?

-Was it before or after the Christians slaughtered Jews in Jerusalem so as to wipe them out from their holy lands? Or, did Judeo-Christian values emerge after the Muslims captured Jerusalem and brought in Jewish families so that they could once again worship in their holy land?

-And, what do we make of their theological differences? Jews don't accept Christ, we do. Jews belive in the ONE non-triune God, like us. Our scripture honours Mary and Christ, whilst the Jews dishonour Mary and say Christ is boiling in his own excrement.

I could go on and on.....by using that term in the way that I do, I call out its fallacy.

What say you, GOY?

I think it's called Judeo-Christian because of the same fundamental holy scripture that both religions are based on (of course the texts now are quite distinct, so Christianity is effectively an offshoot of Judaism), rather than any common shared belief or what modern Jews and Christians believe. I agree though that the term is often used to separate out Judaism and Christianity from Islam. I would lump all three Abrahamic faiths into the "Abrahamic creed", given the common subtext that runs through all three religions, and combined they form a distinct body of beliefs compared with other global historical belief systems, despite borrowing heavily from proto-Abrahamic beliefs from the region that came before.

 

[Davey Crockett]

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

You only see that because I'm the one pointing out people like the son of the "Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques" is hugging Epstein (and nobody is saying why) but nobody wants to add "Muslim" to the Judeo-Christian narrative trying to be sold.

It's a
Judeo-Christian-Muslim pedophile child trafficking ring
Judeo-Christian-Muslim pedophile child trafficking ring
Judeo-Christian-Muslim pedophile child trafficking ring

Judeo-Christian-Muslim pedophile child trafficking ring
Judeo-Christian-Muslim pedophile child trafficking ring

I understand your POV, Epstein is a very controversial figure.

any image with him privately taken, is illusive.

I also understand, you are wary, about, explanations given.

But, lets be fair, most of the people, who had mails with him have no photograph with him.

this is one of the few cases, where he has no mails with him.

so, I think, you are biased here (im not MBS supporter anyway), benefit of the doubt is whats needed here.

sorry, for my last post, I respect your opinion and fully understand it

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Not all that different than a few other posters here.

yes, have to agree, including myself!
khe khe khe

 

[Fatman17]

How Polio Vaccination Became a Spy Network Run by Pakistan's Establishment and Bill Gates

The release of the Jeffrey Epstein files has torn away the mask from one of the most disturbing conspiracies in modern history. What Pakistani sceptics have claimed for decades is now documented proof: the polio vaccination campaign in Pakistan was never just about health. It was a sophisticated intelligence operation run by global elites with the full knowledge and participation of the Pakistani establishment.

Epstein in Pakistan: The Predator Who Ran Polio

Court documents confirm that Jeffrey Epstein, a man whose name is synonymous with child trafficking and satanic rituals, personally visited Pakistan's tribal areas in 2013. His mission was polio eradication. He met with the FATA Secretary of Health and the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Secretary of Health. He claimed to have negotiated with a senior Taliban figure regarding vaccination bans. The question demands an answer why was a convicted paedophile granted access to Pakistan's most sensitive security zones? The only logical conclusion is that polio was the cover while intelligence gathering was the real purpose.

The 2015 Intelligence Briefing Smoking Gun

The most damning evidence comes from a 2015 intelligence briefing that Epstein received. This document, which analysed the Taliban's leadership succession, casually referenced the Polio Eradication Programme. This proves beyond doubt that polio workers were being discussed in high level intelligence circles. It confirms the spy network allegations that vaccine sceptics have faced death for raising.

Bill Gates The Humanitarian Mask

The files expose Bill Gates as deeply entangled in this web. Emails show that Gates' personal science advisor, Boris Nikolic, regularly consulted Epstein on polio matters in Pakistan. Gates expressed fury over Pakistani media coverage and fearing Imran Khan in this project. They met Nawaz shrif Maryam Nawaz asif Ali Zaradri and Pakistani army Chiefs openly The Gates Foundation has spent billions on polio. The Epstein Files raise a horrifying question: was that money funding vaccines or intelligence infrastructure?

The Pakistani Establishment Complicit or Controlled?

Here is the truth that Pakistan must now confront: the establishment was involved. Pakistani health secretaries met Epstein personally. Security personnel allowed him to operate freely in the tribal areas. The ISI's internal strategies were discussed in briefings shared with Epstein. P This was not a foreign operation sneaking into Pakistan. This was a pipeline running through the highest corridors of power.

The Depopulation Connection

Epstein's inner circle openly discussed depopulation agendas targeting poor people. When this is connected to vaccine campaigns in impoverished nations, a sinister pattern begins to emerge. Polio vaccines may have been a delivery system, not for medicine, but for population control and intelligence collection.

Already posted elsewhere

 

[PakSword]

Thread close honay wali hai!

 

[Goenitz]

Thread close honay wali hai!

in time.
However, did anybody see the email about where is the real pilot (after 9/11)

 

[ghazi52]

Hillary Clinton accuses Trump administration of Epstein files 'cover-up' in BBC interview​

Jessica Parker
Berlin correspondent, Berlin

Watch: Hillary Clinton asked about Epstein links and if Andrew should testify
Hillary Clinton has accused US President Donald Trump's administration of a "cover-up" over its handling of files related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

"Get the files out. They are slow-walking it," the former US secretary of state told the BBC in Berlin, where she attended the annual World Forum.

The White House insisted that by releasing the files they had done "more for the victims than Democrats ever have".

Millions of new files relating to the late sex offender Epstein were released by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) earlier this month.

At the time, the deputy attorney general said three million pages were not released - due to the existence of personal medical files, graphic depictions of child abuse or other material that would jeopardise investigations.

When asked whether Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor should go before a congressional committee, Hillary Clinton said: "I think everybody should testify who is asked to testify."

Appearing in the files is not an indication of wrongdoing. Andrew has always denied any wrongdoing.

 

[ghazi52]

The committee does not have the power to compel him to appear in front of them, but put pressure on the Clintons to do so, which they agreed to last month.

Bill Clinton will make his appearance on 27 February and Hillary Clinton will appear the day before.

A planned vote to hold the Clintons in contempt of Congress for initially refusing to appear was shelved after the pair agreed to testify. It will be the first time a former US president has testified to a congressional panel since Gerald Ford did so in 1983.

Hillary Clinton reiterated the couple's call for their congressional committee hearing to be in public rather than a closed-door deposition.

"We will show up but we think it would be better to have it in public," Hillary Clinton told the BBC.

Republican committee chair James Comer had accused the Clintons of "delay", saying the pair "caved" as a contempt vote loomed.

"I just want it to be fair," said Hillary Clinton. "I want everybody treated the same way."

"We have nothing to hide. We have called for the full release of these files repeatedly. We think sunlight is the best disinfectant."

The former presidential candidate argued that she and her husband were being used to divert attention away from Trump.

 

[ghazi52]

"Look at this shiny object. We're going to have the Clintons, even Hillary Clinton, who never met the guy."

Hillary Clinton said she had met Ghislaine Maxwell - Epstein's convicted associate - "on a few occasions".

Bill Clinton - who was featured in the Epstein files - was acquainted with Epstein but said he cut off contact two decades ago.

Neither Clinton has been accused of wrongdoing by survivors of Epstein's abuse, and both have denied knowledge of his sex offending at the time.

 

[ghazi52]

The millions of new files relating to Epstein that were made public by the US justice department earlier this month after Congress passed a law requiring the agency to release material related to investigations of Epstein.

The Department of Justice (DoJ) has now said it has released all of the files required by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, but lawmakers have argued the release is insufficient. Kentucky Republican Representative Thomas Massie, who co-wrote the law, called for the DoJ to also release internal memos outlining past decisions on whether to charge Epstein and his associates.

Epstein died in a New York prison cell on 10 August 2019 as he awaited, without the chance of bail, his trial on sex trafficking charges. It came more than a decade after his conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor, for which he was registered as a sex offender.

Andrew, the former prince, has faced growing pressure from some US officials and the family of his prominent accuser Virginia Giuffre to testify before the Oversight Committee about his links to Epstein.

Andrew has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre in 2022 containing no admission of liability. Giuffre died by suicide in 2025.

 

[ghazi52]

Trump - who is mentioned in the Epstein files - has consistently denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein, with whom he says he severed contact decades ago, and has not been accused of any crimes by Epstein's victims.

When asked about Hillary Clinton's comments in the interview, Trump told the BBC he had nothing to hide.

"I've been exonerated. I had nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein. They went in hoping that they'd find it, and they found just the opposite," he said aboard Air Force One.

"They're getting pulled in. And that's their problem... Clinton and many other Democrats have been pulled in."

In relation to the allegations against Trump, the DoJ has previously said: "Some docs contain untrue and sensationalist claims against Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear the claims are unfounded and false and if they have any shred of credibility they certainly would have been weaponised against Trump already."