Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds
- Thread starter Khorasan Black Flags
- Start date
Hayabusa
Registered Member
They can. No doubt.
But don't expect Tel Aviv to go scot free. Interceptors are already starting to run out and you are seeing more videos of Iran missiles making it through. Even if they did run out, those Shahed drones would do quite a bit of damage on them.
It's a long drawn out war now. USA and Israel has more to lose.
NationalistPKDude132
Trusted Member
If ur talking about Israel there is a mass censorship campaign going on over there so don't expect much to come
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
You never take into account that Shia-led government in Baghdad asked for them to be transferred to Iraq.
Al-Sudani, for his part, was explicit in stressing that hosting the detainees—despite the risks they pose—was fundamentally a preemptive step to protect Iraq’s national security first and foremost
Behind the Transfer of ISIS Detainees to Iraq | Alhurra
As northern Syria entered a new phase, the transfer of thousands of Islamic State detainees to Iraqi custody was seen as more than a logistical operation. Analysts said the move reflected shifting …alhurra.com
Everything is a conspiracy theory nowadays.
At this moment? No, not really. Do you understand what kind of damage 10k terrorist fighters with the backing of the US in a treacherous mountain terrain can inflict on a military?
There's a corridor from Qandil down to Penjwin where thousands of Kurdish terrorists are currently deployed on the Iraqi side of the border.
Iran's landscape is both a benefit and a drawback. Combat in this area is really tough. They don't have the experience, equipment, or resources needed to engage in a civil war on the peaks of the Zagros Mountains. They will most definitely lose control over certain areas. At least the Iranian forces won't be able to access some parts of the territory for a period of time. However, this is not something extraordinary. Look at Syria. Or Turkey pre-Erdoğan. Question is how much actual support PJAK is going to get from Washington.
Would Iran be better off invading Iraq and nipping this in the early stages? The artesh is not doing much right now it seems?
Last edited:
NationalistPKDude132
Trusted Member
Fatman17
Moderator
Repost in PakistanAfghanistan border skirmish please
925boy
Elite Member
I am impressed too. But does this also prove those of us who still believed that hezbollah still had military "juice" left in it, right? Many on this thread and forum said hezbollah was finished,but it just beat Israel's azz thoroughly on the first day of a ground confrontation with Israel since the ceasefire was signed and honored unconditionally by hezbollah only.
tsunset
The Legend
Iranians will bury them aliveYou never take into account that Shia-led government in Baghdad asked for them to be transferred to Iraq.
Al-Sudani, for his part, was explicit in stressing that hosting the detainees—despite the risks they pose—was fundamentally a preemptive step to protect Iraq’s national security first and foremost
Behind the Transfer of ISIS Detainees to Iraq | Alhurra
As northern Syria entered a new phase, the transfer of thousands of Islamic State detainees to Iraqi custody was seen as more than a logistical operation. Analysts said the move reflected shifting …
Everything is a conspiracy theory nowadays.
At this moment? No, not really. Do you understand what kind of damage 10k terrorist fighters with the backing of the US in a treacherous mountain terrain can inflict on a military?
There's a corridor from Qandil down to Penjwin where thousands of Kurdish terrorists are currently deployed on the Iraqi side of the border.
Iran's landscape is both a benefit and a drawback. Combat in this area is really tough. They don't have the experience, equipment, or resources needed to engage in a civil war on the peaks of the Zagros Mountains. They will most definitely lose control over certain areas. At least the Iranian forces won't be able to access some parts of the territory for a period of time. However, this is not something extraordinary. Look at Syria. Or Turkey pre-Erdoğan. Question is how much actual support PJAK is going to get from Washington.
Nobody will accept ethnic terrorists in the country, people and even kids with ak-47 will kick them back to where they came from
Shags101
Trusted Member
Yeah I know that if the Iranians hit a military site we won’t know about that for months if not years but death are two different things they can’t sweep that under the rug like they did once upon A time
Ravenman
Registered Member
You never take into account that Shia-led government in Baghdad asked for them to be transferred to Iraq.
Al-Sudani, for his part, was explicit in stressing that hosting the detainees—despite the risks they pose—was fundamentally a preemptive step to protect Iraq’s national security first and foremost
Behind the Transfer of ISIS Detainees to Iraq | Alhurra
As northern Syria entered a new phase, the transfer of thousands of Islamic State detainees to Iraqi custody was seen as more than a logistical operation. Analysts said the move reflected shifting …
Everything is a conspiracy theory nowadays.
At this moment? No, not really. Do you understand what kind of damage 10k terrorist fighters with the backing of the US in a treacherous mountain terrain can inflict on a military?
There's a corridor from Qandil down to Penjwin where thousands of Kurdish terrorists are currently deployed on the Iraqi side of the border.
Iran's landscape is both a benefit and a drawback. Combat in this area is really tough. They don't have the experience, equipment, or resources needed to engage in a civil war on the peaks of the Zagros Mountains. They will most definitely lose control over certain areas. At least the Iranian forces won't be able to access some parts of the territory for a period of time. However, this is not something extraordinary. Look at Syria. Or Turkey pre-Erdoğan. Question is how much actual support PJAK is going to get from Washington.
Turkey is in Northern Iraq for years now. It wouldnt be a piece of cake for the Kurds to enter the Iranian border without Turkish knowlegde.
I know Hakan Fidan opted once about joint Turkish-Iranian action against Kurdish groups at the borders.
Falcon29
Elite Member
This appears to me we are heading towards a settlement which will be announced after Iran selects their new leader
Israel, GCC, Hezbollah emerge as biggest winners of conflict
US and Iran lost the most
US and Trump admin are biggest loser because it guarantees US will have to remain in Middle East for another decade at minimum
Israel, GCC, Hezbollah emerge as biggest winners of conflict
US and Iran lost the most
US and Trump admin are biggest loser because it guarantees US will have to remain in Middle East for another decade at minimum
Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ
Trusted Member
If you see the suez crisis... back then it was the US who showed UK and France their place. This rhymes as much as it should...
NationalistPKDude132
Trusted Member
Their middle east structtur got torched lol
Especially the guy who was in charge of bombing Bahrain yeah he was probably launching 24/7 so Bahrain's us infrastructure is probably rubble
925boy
Elite Member
Ok,sure.
Just an FYI that Israel hid ALOT of the damage Nasrallah and his leadership did to
Falcon29
Elite Member
It isn't. Why begs question why US joined Israel in the opening strike. The Israeli opening strike put US forces at risk as US capacity in region has not been built up for this task.
It's possible Israel knows this and just wants to cause much damage to Iran it can before US announces return to nuclear deal
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
Latest Posts
-
-
-
-
-
Pakistani Company made EV NORA E30 (for approx 2 Million RS) L7 Category (9 Viewers)
- Latest: Hussain