mangekyo
Trusted Member
Interesting read. I was listening to a podcast today. A US service member who had worked at Diego Garcia said the same thing. They can’t sustain the air raids for much longer.
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds
- Thread starter Khorasan Black Flags
- Start date
Interesting read. I was listening to a podcast today. A US service member who had worked at Diego Garcia said the same thing. They can’t sustain the air raids for much longer.
925boy
Elite Member
Like????
I'll give you you one- people on this thread who ask questions like "what's Iran's production rate currently of drones, missles, rockets, and every piece of locally produced ammunition"
Its like helloo...are you working for intelligence agency or dunno foreign agencies are here?
Still superior than Goyem Sh*t
RocketLaw
Registered Member
Up to this point, the Iranians have been deliberately sending out their outdated missiles and cheap drones as disposable decoys, fully aware they were expendable, just to bleed US and Israeli air defenses dry.
And that strategy worked.
Now they’re dropping the pretense. They’re moving on to their more sophisticated ballistic missiles and advanced drones, raising the stakes and tightening the pressure.
Interceptor stockpiles are already running dangerously low, and the strain is hitting the United States, Israel, and their allies really hard.
And that strategy worked.
Now they’re dropping the pretense. They’re moving on to their more sophisticated ballistic missiles and advanced drones, raising the stakes and tightening the pressure.
Interceptor stockpiles are already running dangerously low, and the strain is hitting the United States, Israel, and their allies really hard.
Hayabusa
Registered Member
They can. No doubt.
But don't expect Tel Aviv to go scot free. Interceptors are already starting to run out and you are seeing more videos of Iran missiles making it through. Even if they did run out, those Shahed drones would do quite a bit of damage on them.
It's a long drawn out war now. USA and Israel has more to lose.
NationalistPKDude132
Trusted Member
If ur talking about Israel there is a mass censorship campaign going on over there so don't expect much to come
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
You never take into account that Shia-led government in Baghdad asked for them to be transferred to Iraq.
Al-Sudani, for his part, was explicit in stressing that hosting the detainees—despite the risks they pose—was fundamentally a preemptive step to protect Iraq’s national security first and foremost
Behind the Transfer of ISIS Detainees to Iraq | Alhurra
As northern Syria entered a new phase, the transfer of thousands of Islamic State detainees to Iraqi custody was seen as more than a logistical operation. Analysts said the move reflected shifting …alhurra.com
Everything is a conspiracy theory nowadays.
At this moment? No, not really. Do you understand what kind of damage 10k terrorist fighters with the backing of the US in a treacherous mountain terrain can inflict on a military?
There's a corridor from Qandil down to Penjwin where thousands of Kurdish terrorists are currently deployed on the Iraqi side of the border.
Iran's landscape is both a benefit and a drawback. Combat in this area is really tough. They don't have the experience, equipment, or resources needed to engage in a civil war on the peaks of the Zagros Mountains. They will most definitely lose control over certain areas. At least the Iranian forces won't be able to access some parts of the territory for a period of time. However, this is not something extraordinary. Look at Syria. Or Turkey pre-Erdoğan. Question is how much actual support PJAK is going to get from Washington.
Would Iran be better off invading Iraq and nipping this in the early stages? The artesh is not doing much right now it seems?
Last edited:
NationalistPKDude132
Trusted Member
Fatman17
Moderator
Repost in PakistanAfghanistan border skirmish please
925boy
Elite Member
I am impressed too. But does this also prove those of us who still believed that hezbollah still had military "juice" left in it, right? Many on this thread and forum said hezbollah was finished,but it just beat Israel's azz thoroughly on the first day of a ground confrontation with Israel since the ceasefire was signed and honored unconditionally by hezbollah only.
tsunset
The Legend
Iranians will bury them aliveYou never take into account that Shia-led government in Baghdad asked for them to be transferred to Iraq.
Al-Sudani, for his part, was explicit in stressing that hosting the detainees—despite the risks they pose—was fundamentally a preemptive step to protect Iraq’s national security first and foremost
Behind the Transfer of ISIS Detainees to Iraq | Alhurra
As northern Syria entered a new phase, the transfer of thousands of Islamic State detainees to Iraqi custody was seen as more than a logistical operation. Analysts said the move reflected shifting …
Everything is a conspiracy theory nowadays.
At this moment? No, not really. Do you understand what kind of damage 10k terrorist fighters with the backing of the US in a treacherous mountain terrain can inflict on a military?
There's a corridor from Qandil down to Penjwin where thousands of Kurdish terrorists are currently deployed on the Iraqi side of the border.
Iran's landscape is both a benefit and a drawback. Combat in this area is really tough. They don't have the experience, equipment, or resources needed to engage in a civil war on the peaks of the Zagros Mountains. They will most definitely lose control over certain areas. At least the Iranian forces won't be able to access some parts of the territory for a period of time. However, this is not something extraordinary. Look at Syria. Or Turkey pre-Erdoğan. Question is how much actual support PJAK is going to get from Washington.
Nobody will accept ethnic terrorists in the country, people and even kids with ak-47 will kick them back to where they came from
Shags101
Trusted Member
Yeah I know that if the Iranians hit a military site we won’t know about that for months if not years but death are two different things they can’t sweep that under the rug like they did once upon A time
Ravenman
Registered Member
You never take into account that Shia-led government in Baghdad asked for them to be transferred to Iraq.
Al-Sudani, for his part, was explicit in stressing that hosting the detainees—despite the risks they pose—was fundamentally a preemptive step to protect Iraq’s national security first and foremost
Behind the Transfer of ISIS Detainees to Iraq | Alhurra
As northern Syria entered a new phase, the transfer of thousands of Islamic State detainees to Iraqi custody was seen as more than a logistical operation. Analysts said the move reflected shifting …
Everything is a conspiracy theory nowadays.
At this moment? No, not really. Do you understand what kind of damage 10k terrorist fighters with the backing of the US in a treacherous mountain terrain can inflict on a military?
There's a corridor from Qandil down to Penjwin where thousands of Kurdish terrorists are currently deployed on the Iraqi side of the border.
Iran's landscape is both a benefit and a drawback. Combat in this area is really tough. They don't have the experience, equipment, or resources needed to engage in a civil war on the peaks of the Zagros Mountains. They will most definitely lose control over certain areas. At least the Iranian forces won't be able to access some parts of the territory for a period of time. However, this is not something extraordinary. Look at Syria. Or Turkey pre-Erdoğan. Question is how much actual support PJAK is going to get from Washington.
Turkey is in Northern Iraq for years now. It wouldnt be a piece of cake for the Kurds to enter the Iranian border without Turkish knowlegde.
I know Hakan Fidan opted once about joint Turkish-Iranian action against Kurdish groups at the borders.
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
-
-
-
-
China’s rail gun milestone: guided projectile prototype passes real firing test (4 Viewers)- Latest: Beijingwalker
-
