Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree While West Point is a prestigious institution, being the world’s mightiest power often leads to a dangerous ego that blinds leadership to the nitty gritty realities of modern warfare. It reminds me mongols against mamluks war of ann jajlut. if your strategic decisions are taken so badly that you don't even inform your Western allies, leading to situations like the UK having only days of gas left and facing total economic destruction. This "mythical power" is clearly flawed when a plan shifts from four days to four weeks to an indefinite struggle, proving there was no real plan for the long-term implications or the massive economic blowback. Furthermore, the very fundamental roots of the American economy are being struck as the wealthiest Arab nations and their investors—who once guaranteed this power see their own economies destabilized. Even Trump himself have admitted surprise at how effectively the Iranians fought back, showing that decades of preparation failed to account for the actual resistance. When some Western allies refuse to participate or label the actions as an illegal war, it proves that this entire strategy is a failure that ignored both the financial foundations and the legal legitimacy required to maintain superpower status.Honest question brother, what do you suppose the US do at Westpoint? Count peanuts?
They did it in Afghanistan under war on terror logoI don’t think that will happen. The rulers know that if they allow it it would be committing suicide. However, if the Americans land on Baluchistan and build up their forces, I’m not sure if anyone in this side would dare stop them. But the Iranians can turn it into a turkey shoot.
None of the the USN ships have come anywhere close to Iran's maritime borders. Closest any ships have gotten is way off the coast of Oman.Iran just need to sink one, they have not seriously attacked their carriers yet, but they will
Thanks for the info. So they are still contemplating a surge to escalate I suppose, not looking for an off ramp anytime soon. Both sides are digging in it seems.These are B1-B heavy bombers that have been positioned in the UK in the event of a surge strike.
They are stationed in the UK for logistical reasons as there is a special air base designed to support them with a long enough runway, apron and support facilities for the c17s thag bring thr logisticsl support and engineers to support and maintain these huge aircraft.
These bases are:
RAF Lakenheath (UK)
RAF Fairford (UK)
Rammstine Air Base (Germany)
Each bomber can carry 24 JASSM (Cruise Missiles) With this many B1B bombers, the US csn deliver 192 crusise missiles with precison in the battlefield.
That is more cruise missiles than most aircraft carrier groups in the world. Please see imagw below for comparision. B1b is the aircraft at the bottom:
View attachment 184396
Do we know if Iran was able to replenish that stockpile of 500-600 in the second half of 2025?
F-16s from Al Dhafra still taking off and flying nonstop
Is the news true that Nevatim airbase of Israel came under attack?
Once you listen to more of his videos you realize he’s borderline insane. I wouldn’t believe all of his predictions.It is unl
It is unlikely since Balcochistan is too far from anything useful in Iran and the terrain is too harsh and infrastructure is non existent.
Professor Jiang is good at his analysis but he lacks his knowledge of Geography.
Highly unlikely. Carriers are sunk only in moviesIran just need to sink one, they have not seriously attacked their carriers yet, but they will
That’s because we don’t have real life attempted examples. Just mere ideas or imaginationHighly unlikely. Carriers are sunk only in movies
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.