Pakistan-Saudi Arabia mutual defense pact: News & Discussion

[RescueRanger]

Need to lock thresd to tidy up secterian/inappopriate commentary.

+++
Thread reopened. No more Shia Sunni nonsense. No more insults hurled at Pak Army, no more dragging of PTI or politics in this thread, no more regional history lessons.

No more defending or gloryfying a terrorist group that murdered hundereds of Ulama in the 90's.
---
Discuss geo strategic and military objectives, pros and cons.
---
I have only given soft warnings, further breach of forum rules will result in thread bans and infarctions.

Thank you.

 

[Respect4Respect]

Because we were playing the double game.... Raymond Davis was a one off happening, you can't generalize it.

Secret memos 'show Pakistan endorsed US drone strikes'.....​

yes you were also playing double games with your own nation too.​

 

[Cipher212]

You can't accept Iran attacking Saudi Arabia with ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and drones for to 3 weeks, with Saudi Arabia not even firing a single projectile towards Iran.

There's a limit to such patience.

All attacks on Saudi Arabia that has a strong 2.7 million Pakistani population are direct attacks on Pakistan.

Oh hell nah we got Al-Bakistanis still breathing in 2026? Firstly, the Saudi military could not hit the broad side of a barn (unless the pilot/operator is a Pakistani on deputation). They can't even beat Houthis.

Secondly, an attack on Saudi Arabia does not equate an attack on Pakistan. We are not going to get ourselves dragged into posturing against our own neighbour over some symbolic 'pact'. Neither is Saudi Arabia really asking us to do so anyway.

Thirdly, Saudi Arabia could have been safe if it ejected all foreign military presence at the start of this war from its bases and forbade use of its airspace for offensive operations against a neighbouring country. Unfortunately, they're cucks.

If the Saudis do feel like they have to hit back at Iran though. I would suggest they send their F-15s to escort Israeli figher jets on their way to Iran. I'm sure they'd love that.

 

[Bilal]

US , GCC backed Saddam attack on Iran "The Iran-Iraq War began on September 22, 1980, when Iraq invaded Iran, and ended on August 20, 1988 "

There was also Iran contra affair funneling American and Israeli weapons into Iran. Point being we are too simplistic.

 

[Yasser76]

No real good options for Pakistan here to be honest, damned if we do, damned if we dont. Pretty much sums up all the conversations on this thread...

 

[mythbuster]

No real good options for Pakistan here to be honest, damned if we do, damned if we dont. Pretty much sums up all the conversations on this thread...

It's all smoke and mirrors , there are curtains after curtains in this theatre and Pakistan is among the puppet masters.... nothing to worry about.

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

Saudis are not saints by any stretch of imagination either.
They helped Zionists launch both Gulf wars (91 and 03).

Nonsense. They funded the US to launch both thr Gulf Wars.

Neither of these wars could have happened if it were not for their full logistical support.

Iraq deserved it.

Who told the Iraqis that it would be okay to launch ballistic missiles on Saudi Arabia in 1990?

 

[Master Chief]

So regarding the Pak involvement in the Iran-Zio War, i want to put a few questions:

1. What are Saudis lacking for their defense which we will be able to provide in addition. They have the best SAMs, BM interceptors, aircraft, US/NATO style trained Airforce, weaponry. Are they asking us to do their dirty work while they sit and enjoy their true enemy gets bombed by 16s from 9/29/11/5 guys. What an absurd idea. Their F15s carry more, go farther with refueling which our F16 boys dont do (unless flying to US for Redflags which happens like once/twice in a decade), have access to TDL directly to E3 AWACS. I mean what is the great tactical advantage that we are going to give to Saudis which they don't have already.

2. Are we going to allow joint Pak-Saudi ops from BLN.

3. Will we have any goodwill left at all when we officially join this Zionist led crusade against Iran on the behalf of Saudis. Whether the current Islamic Govt. in Iran survives or not, the moment our first strike lands inside Iran, the opinion in the Iranian public and elites will change from ambivalence/luke warm friendliness to openly hostile and for good. Remember Persians are proud people with a long memory and they wont let things go ever. A favorite quote for takfiris is that Shias are Majoos hurt over the Arab conquest 1400 years ago. Imagine when the current war come to a conclusion, Iran would become and remain openly hostile to us for the foreseeable future. An open enmity with Iran for decades to come, will it be worth its price, any price.

Hence we must remain neutral.

 

[Master Chief]

All terrorists that openly threaten Pakistan and Saudi Arabia need to be dealt with an Iron rod.

Our military has just concluded target practice over Afghanistan in preparation for airstrikes over Houthi occupied areas of Yemen.

I beg to differ sir. Pakistan shall look after Pakistani interests, and at most, send well wishes to anyone else who is interested in receiving them.

 

[Yasser76]

It's all smoke and mirrors , there are curtains after curtains in this theatre and Pakistan is among the puppet masters.... nothing to worry about.

Sorry, that is conjuncture, your very post proves my point about uncertainty. There is everything to worry about.

 

[hasssanali8998]

damned if we dont

dont care

strict neutarlity

if we do anyhting this could easily spill into pakistan .
dont care about saudi/GCCS dont care about iran
dickriders of both can go to hell

 

[hasssanali8998]

Iraq deserved it.

what the actual ****

a million people dead and they deserve it ???

 

[Yasser76]

dont care

strict neutarlity

if we do anyhting this could easily spill into pakistan .
dont care about saudi/GCCS dont care about iran
dickriders of both can go to hell

Usually I am in agreement, but both countries can make life very hard for Pakistan. Us staying neutral would actually be appreciated by Iran but not Saudi. Remember the loans and millions of Pakistanis working there.

 

[hasssanali8998]

but both countries can make life very hard for Pakistan.

that is why i said stay neutral , retards here want to go to war for KSA like what ??

 

[Saifullah]

Asking some people Pakistan first or Iran first is like asking American politicians America first or israel first these days.

Even thought unlikely, if Pakistan decides to join the war against Iran as part of the security pact with Saudi, every Pakistani should support Pakistans decision.

Have we not learned from Taliban? For the last 2 decades our people morally and psychically supported them against America just on the basis of Afghanistan being Muslims and USA being kaffirs. But now the same Taliban side with mushriks against us Muslims. It took a few thousand martyred in Pakistan just for people to wake up.

Do we want to do the same with Iran? Just because they’re fighting against USA and israel we blindly support them fully without asking any questions and potentially recreating another Afghanistan? I’m not saying we shouldn’t support Iran at all, we should send medical aid and other essentials, but if confrontation with Iran is in our interests we shouldn’t shy away from it either.

Those who say “stand with the truth” seem to have forgotten Irans cooperation and support to USA in invading Iraq and Afghanistan. A Zionist regime is the last thing Pakistan needs in Iran but the current regime shouldn’t cross redlines either.