Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

31st Marine expeditionary Unit is arriving Friday

82nd Airborne is on the move

by Friday Epstein and Zionist regimes will try and invasion of Iranian territory

I hope Iran is ready

This is my prediction

82nd Airborne lands on Kharg Island

31st Marine expeditionary Unit lands on Straits of Hormuz

they split the Iranian defences

IMG_6802.JPG
 
31st Marine expeditionary Unit is arriving Friday

82nd Airborne is on the move

by Friday Epstein and Zionist regimes will try and invasion of Iranian territory

I hope Iran is ready
USS Tripoli arrived to Diego Garcia recently.

Yesterday position:

FT_3_23_26-1-720x480.jpg





News of one week ago:

It's funny how these news always talk about "send troops to Middle East", like if Middle East were a country. They never talk about the precise host country, I guess due to the deep shame for the host.
 
proof is in the pudding. What I have stated is facts and recent facts in wars over last 50 years.

1st world war was a different world to today.
In the Western world, Europe, US etc, there is a lot of emphasis on life protection, humans are valued, looked after , etc. Whereas in our country, its the opposite - the elites practically own what they consider everyone else to be peasants, and dispense them as/when they please. The average Joe gladly lines up to be slaughtered. Its truly mind boggling.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This war was a stupid idea and the perps now know it was. invading Iran needs many many more troops than they have ready in vicinity and would be even more stupid.
 
I would like to address that bolded part. I've often seen this said by Pakistani's and specifically our old babus.

The Americans can sustain losses, as shown since World War I and II and other conflicts, but under extreme necessity; otherwise, they place a strong emphasis on troop protection and survivability, which runs counter to our Jazba-driven forces. The Israelis, I can understand, have a low threshold due to the availability of military-eligible bodies.

In any warfare, the importance should always be on troop protection and survivability, as a loss of each soldier you lose years or decades of expertise, while the equipment can be replaced in due time.

So, it's not about being a coward, but preserving a valuable resource, an able-bodied individual.

It's a conversation I've had with @Panzerkiel, and he subtly agrees, the value of life isn't well-regarded in our part of the world.
US unfortunately has never fought a war on its on soil. Sure they lose men but thousands of miles away. Their factories and school and businesses and everything else keeps running as if there was no war.

Once their own cities start getting bombed, their resistance to pain would be quite different.
 
Iran should pressure China to take a more active role and guarantee tje ceasefire, if the US breaks it offer military aid and support in an official capacity. They can word the ceasefire statement how they like but to have a viable ceasefire you need strong backing.

China is not an imperialist culture. It’s not in their culture to go to war on behalf of someone else. Even Iran didn’t go to war on behalf of Gaza or Lebanon. Syria was a rare necessity similar to the Korean War for China.

Iran must be the guarantor of its own security either via the Strait or nuclear weapons or both.
 
In the Western world, Europe, US etc, there is a lot of emphasis on life protection, humans are valued, looked after , etc. Whereas in our country, its the opposite - the elites practically own what they consider everyone else to be peasants, and dispense them as/when they please. The average Joe gladly lines up to be slaughtered. Its truly mind boggling.
In Western world there is just a different narrative of lies.

But ruling elites act with impunity world wide (y):ROFLMAO:.

Here the narrative that works is the narrative of public victimization. But it's only a public narrative thing, it's not how power really works.

The difference among West and East, it's that West lies a lot more.
 

JD Vance eyed to take over Iran talks
Connor Stringer, Joe Barnes

Iran refuses peace talks with Trump’s ‘backstabbing’ negotiators

JD Vance being touted as preferred mediator as Tehran turns on Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner

Iran has refused to negotiate with Donald Trump’s top envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, accusing them of “backstabbing”.

Gulf sources told The Telegraph that the Iranians would not sit down with Mr Witkoff, the administration’s Middle East envoy, and Mr Kushner, Mr Trump’s adviser and son-in-law, because of the military strikes that hit Tehran hours after they held talks in February.

JD Vance, the vice-president who has remained largely quiet during the conflict, is now being touted as chief negotiator should fresh discussions go ahead in Islamabad, Pakistan, later this week.

“Vance is preferred,” a Gulf source said of the Iranians. “They don’t want to work with Jared and Witkoff because they stabbed them in the back.”

A second Gulf source said the Iranians believed Mr Vance would stick to his word and that his participation is seen as the appropriate seniority for negotiations with Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the parliament speaker.

Mr Vance is widely viewed as a sceptic of the US president’s “Operation Epic Fury”.

The vice-president’s possible role as leader of a new US negotiating team signals the White House’s intent to head off further economic pain and de-escalate, even though the strategy for ending the war remains unclear.

JD Vance is the 'preferred' negotiator should fresh discussions go ahead

One diplomatic source said Tehran had lost trust in Washington’s delegation and was sceptical of Mr Kushner and Mr Witkoff’s seriousness about ending the conflict.

The US launched strikes on the Iranian capital killing Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, two days after wrapping up negotiations in Geneva.

Several Gulf states had left those talks convinced a deal to avoid a full-blown conflict was possible.

While Islamabad is yet to be confirmed as the venue for negotiations, Shehbaz Sharif, the Pakistani prime minister, said on Tuesday that the country was “ready and honoured” to host negotiations to end the war.

Talks between the US and Iran have been indirect so far, relying on intermediaries.

Egypt, Pakistan and Turkey have passed messages between the US and Iran as rising energy prices and the collateral effects on markets and business from the war hit home.

The foreign ministers of the three countries reportedly held separate talks with Mr Witkoff and Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s foreign minister.

Mr Vance is also said to have spoken with Benjamin Netanyahu – who remains adamant that Israel should continue bombing Iran – and discussed components needed to end the war.

Mr Trump dispatched Mr Witkoff and Mr Kushner to Geneva to hold what would be the last round of negotiations with Iran before the US president decided to launch his military campaign on Feb 28.

Their aims were threefold: Iran could not have a nuclear weapon, meaning its Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites had to be closed, its terrorist proxies shut down, and ballistic missile production curbed.

The negotiations broke down when Tehran handed over a seven-page agreement, described by US officials so full of holes it was akin to “Swiss cheese”, to Mr Witkoff and Mr Kushner on the last day of talks on Feb 26.

With the war in its fourth week, Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, continue to weigh joining the conflict, angered at Tehran’s strikes on their territory.

Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), the Saudi crown prince, reportedly urged Mr Trump to press on with the war, describing the conflict as a “historic opportunity” to remake the region.

In a series of phone calls, MBS urged the president to press for the destruction of Iran’s hardline government, arguing that it posed a long-term threat to the Gulf, according to the New York Times.

The talks coincide with Mr Trump’s about turn on a 48-hour deadline he had imposed on Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the vital sea passage for oil shipments that has been blocked since the start of the war.

In a move which reassured markets, Mr Trump on Monday said he would call off strikes for five days while peace talks took place, prompting the FTSE 100 to swing into the green and Brent crude to fall by 14 per cent to $96 (£76) a barrel.

Claiming that the US had held “very strong talks” with Iran, Mr Trump suggested America would “jointly control” the key oil route and promised there would be a “very serious form of regime change” in the Islamic Republic.

It was unclear whether Mr Trump was suggesting he would have a direct hand in Tehran’s governance, or who the new Iranian leader could be, as well as what role, if any, the Gulf states would play in the country after the war.

Iran denied any such talks had taken place.

“These are sensitive diplomatic discussions and the US will not negotiate through the press. This is a fluid situation, and speculation about meetings should not be deemed final until they are formally announced by the White House,” Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said.


>> This is from "The Telegraph" so take with a pinch of salt.
 
Pakistani sources said the US vice-president, JD Vance, was being put forward as a probable chief negotiator from the US side if talks went ahead. Iranian sources have said they would refuse to sit down with Trump’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, or Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, who led the nuclear negotiations with Iran before the war.


good move
source
 
proof is in the pudding. What I have stated is facts and recent facts in wars over last 50 years.
You state:

"The Americans can sustain losses, as shown since World War I and II and other conflicts"

Thats a bollocks statements

1st and 2nd world world war was a different world to today

your vague other conflicts is meaningless without you being specific.

I address the difference between then and now in my original statement. The soldier of today is a highly trained, specialized soldier who costs hundreds of thousands to train and field. Can't be replicated by a fresh recruit. Today's weapon systems are complex tools, so preserving a single soldier is a necessity; a simple drone wiping out a unit is a sunk cost. As an example, if you lose the operator, you lose the capability entirely. Preservation isn't about fear; it's about maintaining a functional military advantage that cannot be mass-produced.

You should also read the statement after I mentioned World War I & II, and it's good practice to understand the statement in its totality.

The Americans can sustain losses, as shown since World War I and II and other conflicts, but under extreme necessity;

The losses have to be justified, since WWI- and WWII-style combat was a necessity, but fighting ragtag mountain militants isn't.

Another factor to consider is that the West softens its target through sanctions and then bombs the enemy state because the West has a population replacement rate below 2.1, so protection isn't just a choice but a long-term strategy.
 
Last edited:
USS Tripoli arrived to Diego Garcia recently.

Yesterday position:

FT_3_23_26-1-720x480.jpg





News of one week ago:

It's funny how these news always talk about "send troops to Middle East", like if Middle East were a country. They never talk about the precise host country, I guess due to the deep shame for the host.


Ok this is how I see it

82nd has a long history operating from Kuwait that is actually their second home

82nd is going to be dropped in from Kuwait

question is what and how does Iran prepare for this
 
maybe Pakistan should get China onboard for security reasons, the pedophiles might try a sneaky attack with the help of cowpiss drinkers. If kushner is unalived on Pakistani soil it would be very bad optics.

No worry, we have alot of experiences, I think Pakistan officials already thinking about security first before calling Trump and Iran.

China will NOT be involved, they are scared and zero experiences like this big war.
 
here the vid
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


either this is somekind of crazy trick or he is fully nuts now not just partly


Thank God, I was so embarrassed to look at our prime minister whenever he appears on screen and opens his mouth. Trump is occupying all top 10 places on the asshole ranking table. I am relieved.

PS: People should avoid taking offence as I am talking about Anthony Albanese rather than the mighty Shahbaz Sharif.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top