Trump says one officer shot at DC dinner, suspect in custody

img_9423-jpeg.194089

Two posts now.

geez I thought Muji.Iqbal's obsession with Monika Lewinsky was weird now you are closing in on it with Erika Kirk.

 
Last edited:
Puzzled !

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If this was a false flag, was it for Iran or ballroom?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Some guy rushes past security, shots possibly fired by him and/or security, gets tackled, and now this is a conspiracy?
 
Last edited:
It’s very interesting: multiple assassination attempts against Trump over the years in the US; despite the US being geographically separated (by the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans) from most of the world.
However Israel, which is located in a tough neighborhood, which bombs its neighboring countries/regions on an existential level; yet have never heard of any assassination attempts against Netanyahu over decades. I find this peculiar, odd.

I don't think Israelis would assassinate their best resource in decades. Look at the Israeli domestic polling about the 2024 elections and look at how the Jewish-Americans voted the least for the Democratic Party in four decades favoring Trump over Harris. President Trump is Israel's best and final asset.
 
The level of security protection in the United States needs to be strengthened.

The United States has had 47 presidents, and 9 presidents have been attacked. The probability of being attacked is 21.3%.

The 16th, 20th, 25th, and 35th presidents died.

The 7th, 26th, 32nd, 40th, and 45th presidents were injured. Trump is the 45th and 47th president of the United States.
Nothing special
That’s the US system, the president is always exposed to the public. It’s not like Putin’s political system where he hides in bunker all day.
Adding to the fact gun is allowed, then it can happen anytime.
 
The last time Trump was attacked, it was while giving a speech in public; this time it happened in the White House, which has the strictest security.

I think this is a performance to divert public attention.

Let me guess what might happen next.

1. Blame the Democrats, then increase attacks on the Democrats. Ultimately achieve dictatorship.

2. Blame Iran, use this incident to unite internally, and then invade Iran again. Just like the 9/11 event.

3. Blame illegal immigrants, then massively expand the size of ICE.

4. Blame Cuba or Venezuela, withdraw troops from the Iran war, and attack Cuba or Venezuela.

5. Blame China, ask what the cost would be.
It did not happen in the White House. It happened at the White House Correspondent's Dinner at the Washington Hilton Hotel.

Your Point #1 has validity outside of the dictatorship crap. The rest are pure silliness. Stop it.
 
Kind of related to this thread: I saw an English lady trying to settle down in America but then went back to England. In her You Tube video she said something like 'She couldn't agree with a culture of guns. She said in the UK the cops don't even carry guns but in America it was different'.
I have been pondering about that.
 
Kind of related to this thread: I saw an English lady trying to settle down in America but then went back to England. In her You Tube video she said something like 'She couldn't agree with a culture of guns. She said in the UK the cops don't even carry guns but in America it was different'.
I have been pondering about that.
Odd. Last time I was in the UK, happened to be in the right place at the right time to witness the Changing of the Guard at Buckingham. Was able to chat with a couple of the London police officers. One was armed with an MP-5 in .40S&W. The other was armed with a Glock 22 in .40S&W.

Perhaps the English lady you observed is misinformed.
 
Odd. Last time I was in the UK, happened to be in the right place at the right time to witness the Changing of the Guard at Buckingham. Was able to chat with a couple of the London police officers. One was armed with an MP-5 in .40S&W. The other was armed with a Glock 22 in .40S&W.
Perhaps the English lady you observed is misinformed.

I don't know. Never been to the UK except a transit through the Heathrow. But that lady was not some outlier/politically motivated. Just another immigrant to America. She was white. Only people living in the UK/England could say more about her experience compared with their experience in America, if they had any.
 
Odd. Last time I was in the UK, happened to be in the right place at the right time to witness the Changing of the Guard at Buckingham. Was able to chat with a couple of the London police officers. One was armed with an MP-5 in .40S&W. The other was armed with a Glock 22 in .40S&W.

Perhaps the English lady you observed is misinformed.
Most police officers in the UK (England, Scotland, and Wales) do not carry guns while on duty, operating under a principle of "policing by consent". Only a small percentage—roughly 5-10%—are specially trained Authorised Firearms Officers (AFOs) who carry firearms, generally deployed only for high-risk incidents. However, all police in Northern Ireland are routinely armed.
 
Some guy rushes past security, shots possibly fired by him and/or security, gets tackled, and now this is a conspiracy?
It's what "they" do to not have to face the reality that this is just some dude that wanted Orangeman dead. The left is going to do the same to deflect that this guy is one of their own.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top