Bangladesh approves project to 'negate negative impact' of India's Farakka Barrage

LeonBlack08

INT'L MOD
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
6,851
Reaction score
10,676
Reputation
3,844.1
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
Dhaka, Bangladesh on Wednesday approved a mega project to build a barrage on the Padma river, saying the structure is expected to help "negate the negative impact" of India's Farakka Barrage upstream.

The development comes months before the 1996 Indo-Bangladesh Ganges Water Sharing Treaty is due to expire in December. Padma river is known as Ganges in India.

The Executive Committee of the National Economic Council , chaired by Prime Minister Tarique Rahman, cleared the first phase of the Padma Barrage project at an estimated cost of Tk 34,497.25 crore , officials here said.

One of the main objectives of the project is to store water on the Bangladesh side to "negate the negative impact of the Farakka Barrage" on the Ganges, Water Resources Minister Shahiduddin Chowdhury Anee told reporters after the ECNEC meeting.

He, however, clarified that issues relating to the 54 common rivers shared by India and Bangladesh are not linked to the project.

The minister said the barrage is being built in Bangladesh's national interest and did not require any discussion with India.

"Padma Barrage is a matter of Bangladesh's own interest and there is no need for any discussion with India over the issue," he said.

Anee, however, said discussions with India on the Ganges waters are continuing.

India commissioned the 2,240-metre-long Farakka Barrage in West Bengal in 1975 to divert water from the Ganges into the Hooghly river in order to flush out silt and maintain the navigability of the Kolkata port.

The Farakka issue has long remained a sensitive subject in Bangladesh, with successive governments and experts alleging that reduced dry-season water flows downstream caused salinity intrusion, river degradation and adverse effects on agriculture and ecology in Bangladesh.

India has consistently maintained that the Farakka Barrage was built primarily to preserve the Kolkata port and that water-sharing issues have been addressed through bilateral mechanisms and agreements, including the Ganges Water Sharing Treaty between the two countries.
 
India has consistently maintained that the Farakka Barrage was built primarily to preserve the Kolkata port and that water-sharing issues have been addressed through bilateral mechanisms and agreements, including the Ganges Water Sharing Treaty between the two countries.
Of course. Such written and attested agreements with the chanakiya qom are worth what exactly?
 
Water Resources Minister Shahiduddin Chowdhury Anee is getting a lot of social media accolades for this particular statement -

"Padma Barrage is a matter of Bangladesh's own interest and there is no need for any discussion with India over the issue,"

Hopefully it's not just a social media stunt and we actually get to see the project complete.
 
Of course. Such written and attested agreements with the chanakiya qom are worth what exactly?

We have started seeing desertification in certain parts of Bangladesh because of Farakka. Almost unbelievable for a country that gets huge amount of rainfall annually. We need to act quickly to reverse the damage done over decades.
 
Well done Bangladesh. This is how you do it. No whining, just action.
 
Water Resources Minister Shahiduddin Chowdhury Anee is getting a lot of social media accolades for this particular statement -

"Padma Barrage is a matter of Bangladesh's own interest and there is no need for any discussion with India over the issue,"

Hopefully it's not just a social media stunt and we actually get to see the project complete.

They will do it. Work will start from July this year.
 
Hopefully it's not just a social media stunt and we actually get to see the project complete.
I think BNP admin will do it at any cost. This barrage project is cheap compared to the amount of positive impacts it will bring to Bangladesh. Especially to BNPs image.
 
Of course. Such written and attested agreements with the chanakiya qom are worth what exactly?
Rich coming from someone who ruled East Pakistan and took care of West Pakistan with Indus water treaty while leaving their East Pakistan brethen high and dry

EDIT: The project is overdue. Surprised Bangladesh has not built more of these dams
 
Rich coming from someone who ruled East Pakistan and took care of West Pakistan with Indus water treaty while leaving their East Pakistan brethen high and dry

EDIT: The project is overdue. Surprised Bangladesh has not built more of these dams
Remind me again which disputed border region between erstwhile East Pakistan and India mandated a treaty that was explicitly designed to govern water flow through such a disputed area?
 
Remind me again which disputed border region between erstwhile East Pakistan and India mandated a treaty that was explicitly designed to govern water flow through such a disputed area?
Indus water sharing does not involve Kashmir. you did not nothing for East Pakistanis. Tell me how many dams were built in West Pakistan before 1971
 
Indus water sharing does not involve Kashmir. you did not nothing for East Pakistanis. Tell me how many dams were built in West Pakistan before 1971
You genius. I am pointing out to you that IWT governed water sharing from sources that lay in DISPUTED TERRITORY.

The Brahmaputra and Ganges did not flow from disputed territory therefore did not require a specific treaty to resolve their utility for downstream riparian territory. Yes, there were some distinct border disputes between erstwhile East Pakistan and India but these were themselves resolved in the 1950s.

You are comparing apples with oranges just to try and make some desperate point to deflect from my original point, which is that the Indian race in general has demonstrated that it will not honour any agreed, attested, witnessed, and signed treaty. We have evidence of this behaviour, which is likened to simple breach of an agreed contract.

Then, being well aware of your own subterfuge, you introduced two new and different complaints about "doing nothing for East Pakistan" and "not building dams in West Pakistan".

Address my accusation first then I will fix you up on these new problems that seem to be keeping you up at night.

As a side note, the above is why we call you the Chanakiya Qom.

Do you understand now?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top