Firstly there always will be a minority population in India, even in border states, because India unlike Pakistan was established as secular country, for all faiths to resides in, with no preference being given to one particular faith. However their numbers would not as high as they are today, which is mainly due illegal migration from Bangladesh.
Lets take Assam as an example which is border state of Bangladesh. Their Muslim population at the time of partition was mere 12 percent, it has reached almost 40 percent, why do you that has happened ?
The Muslim population in Assam has risen to 40% in the past seven decades and the change in demography has become a “matter of life and death”, chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said on Wednesday. | India News
www.hindustantimes.com
Let's keep it simple for you, since you are desperate to deflect your way out of the squalid little hole you have now pitched your tent in.
You said (see your full post as quoted below): it makes no sense that border states should have any minority communities if the majoritarian state lies immediately next door.
I called this "theory" out as b.s. as it was (and remains) both unsubstantiated by way of fact and illogical by way of reason.
I do not care one jot which state has which percentage of which minority - that is a conversation that you have tried to impose after being outed as fraudulent on the point I actually raised with you.
Your post:
"What proper documentation do illegal migrants possess?
What documentation do you need?
There were millions of Muslims in India who remained after partition( but in the interior), but not in border states with Pakistan, especially the states which were divided between India and Pakistan, namely Bengal and Punjab, as these states saw most of the rioting of the partition, these states saw almost complete population exchanges or decimation at the hand of rioters.
There were 50 million refugees at partition who either went from India to Pakistan or vice versa and most of them in these two states.
It defies common sense that millions of Muslims will choose to remain in India in states bordering Bangladesh at partition and complete negates logic behind formation of your country."
To further discredit your nonsense, consider that a border state in Pakistan does indeed have the highest number of Hindus and another border state in Pakistan does indeed have the highest number of Sikhs. Would you like me to give you the names of these states? Can you work it out yourself for 10 bonus points?
It stands to reason quite logically therefore that border states in Hindustan may well have the highest number of Muslims in them.
2 nation theory simply does NOT obviate the likelihood of any of the above being true, contrary to your bizarre claims.
