Breaking News: Yemen's Houthis strike Saudi Arabia's Abha airport with missiles and drones in a sharp escalation

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

With respect, you used alot of fancy english to answer something I never even said.

First, I am not looking at this from any sectarian angle. I am talking about Iranian policy and how Iran uses armed groups for its own interest. criticizing Iran is not sectarian. Calling everyone sectarian is just an easy way to avoid the actual point.

Second, who got the benefit? Iran got an armed group right on Saudi border, pressure on KSA without fighting directly, influence near Bab al mandab and the option to deny everything. Houthis got weapons, training and control over large parts of Yemen. What did ordinary Yemenis got? Hunger, destruction and graves.

Iran benefits while someone else country gets destroyed. We already saw this in Lebanon, Syria and now Yemen.

The answer was very simple, there was no need for all this Shakespeare.

secondly, IR does not benefit.. as IR has nothing gained financially or politically.

zios benefit who have now proved a reason for US bases in the region!

which will now become zios bases.

now problem with you is, that, the moment I say zios, you will argue IR is also majoosi, zios supporter!


please, give me a break!

 

[F.O.X]

no, it was written to show how you write, without making sense and writing and observing every event from sectarian lense!

which is not only dishonest, is also very myopic!

Please enlighten me which of my paragraphs were hard enough for you to understand. I will try to write it in easy english.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

@F.O.X

im sorry what so funny?!!

im have respected you opinion thus, far, it may not be the case if you do those idiotic smileys!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Please enlighten me which of my paragraphs were hard enough for you to understand. I will try to write it in easy english.

why should I accept your POV, please prove with these actions zios have become less stronger!

 

[F.O.X]

secondly, IR does not benefit.. as IR has nothing gained financially or politically.

zios benefit who have now proved a reason for US bases in the region!

which will now become zios bases.

now problem with you is, that, the moment I say zios, you will argue IR is also majoosi, zios supporter!


please, give me a break!

I said iiran benefits from having an armed group on Saudi Arabia’s border. You replied that Iran made no money. since when does a country need to make a profit for a strategy to serve its interests ?

& if the US now has another reason to keep bases in the region, who do you think is responsible for that ? . Both sides can use the same conflict for their own purposes while Yemen pays the price.

ss for the rest, you have invented my next argument and then got angry at me for it. I never called Iranians "majoosi" or said Iran supports Israel.

Please give me a break and reply to what I actually wrote.

 

[F.O.X]

why should I accept your POV, please prove with these actions zios have become less stronger!

View attachment 215691

when was the last time iran attacked zios ?

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

I said iiran benefits from having an armed group on Saudi Arabia’s border. You replied that Iran made no money. since when does a country need to make a profit for a strategy to serve its interests ?

& if the US now has another reason to keep bases in the region, who do you think is responsible for that ? . Both sides can use the same conflict for their own purposes while Yemen pays the price.

ss for the rest, you have invented my next argument and then got angry at me for it. I never called Iranians "majoosi" or said Iran supports Israel.

Please give me a break and reply to what I actually wrote.

please be clear, what are you arguing, IR benefits?!!

who attacked houthis first?

which country was made by the British, which country serves the British?!!

British here mean, zios!

I will write a detailed reply, only a starter, wait for an hour!

 

[F.O.X]

why should I accept your POV, please prove with these actions zios have become less stronger!

View attachment 215691

also please enlighten what were the difficult words in the above attached image of my post ?

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

when was the last time iran attacked zios ?

WTF are you on about, why should IR attack zios when you have so many so muslims around it?!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

also please enlighten what were the difficult words in the above attached image of my post ?

very sectarian obscure POV!

 

[F.O.X]

please be clear, what are you arguing, IR benefits?!!

who attacked houthis first?

which country was made by the British, which country serves the British?!!

British here mean, zios!

I will write a detailed reply, only a starter, wait for an hour!

Where the F did the british come into this argument from? We were talking about the Houthis, Saudi Arabia and Iran also add israel. I asked what Iran gets out of having an armed group on KSA’s border, and suddenly you are talking about who the British created.

Stick to the point for once.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Where the F did the british come into this argument from? We were talking about the Houthis, Saudi Arabia and Iran also add israel. I asked what Iran gets out of having an armed group on KSA’s border, and suddenly you are talking about who the British created.

Stick to the point for once.

why not, who are you to say, any historical point in the discussion will be set by you!

what am I to, a fool?!!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Where the F did the british come into this argument from? We were talking about the Houthis, Saudi Arabia and Iran also add israel. I asked what Iran gets out of having an armed group on KSA’s border, and suddenly you are talking about who the British created.

Stick to the point for once.

why shouldnt british/zios be part of the discussion?!! why?!!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

@F.O.X

you lost my respect, now, here onwards, expect the same trolling!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

I said iiran benefits from having an armed group on Saudi Arabia’s border. You replied that Iran made no money. since when does a country need to make a profit for a strategy to serve its interests ?

& if the US now has another reason to keep bases in the region, who do you think is responsible for that ? . Both sides can use the same conflict for their own purposes while Yemen pays the price.

ss for the rest, you have invented my next argument and then got angry at me for it. I never called Iranians "majoosi" or said Iran supports Israel.

Please give me a break and reply to what I actually wrote.

Let me lay out the shape of your argument, point by point, so that you may see it plainly:

1. It is a majoosi kafir country; it supported Syria’s dictator, backed Hezbollah, and inflicted great suffering upon the Arabs there—therefore, it is deemed an enemy of Muslims.
2. It is an enemy of Muslims because it has carried out attacks against Saudi Arabia and other Arab states.
3. It is a non-Muslim state because it has enabled the Houthis to carry out attacks against Saudi Arabia.
4. And it is a non-Muslim state because it weakens a Muslim country.

This sums up all your arguments!

and one more argument,


5. IR is using Houthis to attack KSA