PakistanLVR
Registered Member
- Thread starter
- #61
I like you as a member because you’re very intelligent and I enjoy reading your comments. I also like @Wantadar.You talking cr@p
A unique ability to be absurdly simplistic when it suits
Countries talking to countries is not a rebuff of a third party
Field marshal is not planet earth diplomat, if Pakistan has a role so be it, who thought it should be oermi
Your type of nationalism is bizarre, if even nationalism, you take your domestic gripes to the point you undermine the national interest
Listen.... imperfect stability is better than total collapse, if you want change you necessarily have to find a way that's not implying sovereign collapse, and frankly what right do you have to egg this on when the situation is clearly so challenging, so high stakes, yet you just see munir munir everywhere
it's reminiscent of Iranian monarchists who became so debased they supported the bombing of their nation so their faction, their tribe their people can take power .
I think I shared his rightful criticism of the scam system in Pakistan. Sure the IK stuff goes a little far but try to understand what IK meant for many Pakistanis. His reign was the first time I observed people being proud of Pakistanis. It truly was on the cusp of become major power in both body and mind. To us he was the hope that finally Pakistan will get its act together and the people will march lock step with the military. But the system is utterly corrupt. Outsiders such as the U.S. or Saudis might not be able to fully control it but they sure can influence it. Yeah IK didn’t do much, but he lit a the fire under the country before rent a cop Generals decided the people sooner or later demand accountability. Everything in Pakistan leads back to the half-wit “Generals.”
The people of Pakistan are frankly tired of the charade and to become a self respecting modern country. I’ll start another topic someday but it’ll probably get deleted. Just want to say go easy on him.





