I*R*A
Registered Member
He is a modi bakht hidutva living in Bangladesh (may be).
Makkah Defence Alliance: Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, news & updates
- Thread starter hyperman
- Start date
He is a modi bakht hidutva living in Bangladesh (may be).
I think some Pakistani ranked officers will be in Yemen to guide the Yemeni forces.
El Sidd
Elite Member
Bangladesh came into being after rejecting and spitting on slogan of Pakistan which carried proclamation of the Muslim faith.
These people chose their ethnicity over values offered by Islam.
Yet in this deranged world, they are speaking for unity of Muslims and about Islam.
Pakistan should take back recognition of the Khawarij Bengaldesh.
Yasser76
Elite Member
El Sidd
Elite Member
The ruling is quite clear. Pakistan is a majority Sufi/Shia country. This fatwa will help struggle against Pakistani authorities.
AzadPakistan2009 and his likes(Imam Niazi Group) do not recognise courts and government of Pakistan.
r3alist
Elite Member
Toxic mix of nationalism posing as islamic guardians.
Shows the intellect level unfortunately of Muslims, as long as everyone has a nation state sovereign container no one can talk.
Yet the sovereign container is preferable to being a wasteland, who wants to live in Yemen, or Afghanistan.
So everyone is promoting the doom spiral, in some way
El Sidd
Elite Member
Most of it comes down to South Asian mentality where Persia is treated as a civilization and Persians treated as genetically better than South Asians like any other colonial entity.
This lofty status allows for Persians to get away with brutal internal crackdowns, the intensity even half of it would make Pakistan lose yet another territory like they did in East Pakistan.
BaybarsHan
Registered Member
The reaction of the Mecca Pact now gives us a preview of the future. How will it act, and how far will its military aid to its alliance partners extend?
All friends and foes are watching the capabilities of this very young pact very closely.
And we can already draw a small comparison to NATO. NATO had interventions in the Bosnian War in 1992, Kosovo in 1999, Afghanistan in 2003, and Libya in 2011.
Yes, I know NATO is utter garbage and essentially only serves to advance American interests. But it's a similar alliance in principle and therefore comparable. NATO takes a very long time to become truly militarily active. They played the role of world police for a very long time, trying to manipulate the UN in the process. Anyway, this isn't primarily about NATO... one thing I can say for sure: the Mecca Pact's willingness to provide rapid assistance is much stronger. For NATO, meaning the USA, the Europeans and the UN have always been a hindrance—lots of talk, but no action.
The Middle East, as the English call it, our living space, has many problems. And most of these problems were created by America and Europe, meaning the West. I'm not claiming we wouldn't have any problems at all without their intervention. What country on earth doesn't have problems? We would have far fewer. Before this gets too far-fetched...
On the topic at hand, a Mecca Pact like the one we have now should have existed much earlier; it could have been called the Arab Pact or something else. I'm satisfied for now; they're not just talking, they're taking action, and this is just the beginning.
It can only get better.
All friends and foes are watching the capabilities of this very young pact very closely.
And we can already draw a small comparison to NATO. NATO had interventions in the Bosnian War in 1992, Kosovo in 1999, Afghanistan in 2003, and Libya in 2011.
Yes, I know NATO is utter garbage and essentially only serves to advance American interests. But it's a similar alliance in principle and therefore comparable. NATO takes a very long time to become truly militarily active. They played the role of world police for a very long time, trying to manipulate the UN in the process. Anyway, this isn't primarily about NATO... one thing I can say for sure: the Mecca Pact's willingness to provide rapid assistance is much stronger. For NATO, meaning the USA, the Europeans and the UN have always been a hindrance—lots of talk, but no action.
The Middle East, as the English call it, our living space, has many problems. And most of these problems were created by America and Europe, meaning the West. I'm not claiming we wouldn't have any problems at all without their intervention. What country on earth doesn't have problems? We would have far fewer. Before this gets too far-fetched...
On the topic at hand, a Mecca Pact like the one we have now should have existed much earlier; it could have been called the Arab Pact or something else. I'm satisfied for now; they're not just talking, they're taking action, and this is just the beginning.
It can only get better.
r3alist
Elite Member
Fallen into the trap that anyone who is projected as an authentic resistance is the resistance, the Soviet's exploited this, Russia is doing this and so is Iran.
Houthis and Taliban are nationalist mountain dwellers, no Iranian would live there.
Frankly Muslims are scripting their next catastrophe, first Muslims lost their empires, resources and now losing their nation states, what's left after that
c14-Isotope
Registered Member
wrong. pakistan is part of middle east and there are plenty of dictatorships, monarchies and autocracies in the middle east, so what iran has done is par for the course.
r3alist
Elite Member
Well I think it's better to not ignore the weight of Iran and Saudi
El Sidd
Elite Member
It has nothing to do with Muslims or their faith.
India hosts 3rd largest population of Shias in the world after Pakistan and Iran.
Goenitz
Elite Member
Classic Pak Afghan example. Have been soemwhat britherly relations but now we are bombing eachother.
hydrabadi_arab
Trusted Member
Epic meltdown on social media by certain quarters
