Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

No, not even close. Iran's revenue from the Strait of Hormuz will not surpass $15 billion, even if all countries, and I emphasize all countries, accept to pay Iran the fee that the IRGC is wishing for and do not think about replacing the Strait of Hormuz in a couple of years, and the Strait of Hormuz does not remain leaky. So, that's Iran's income in the ideal situation.

Iran's oil exports have dropped to fewer than 300K barrels per day, and probably even fewer than 150K barrels per day. That would add another $10 billion of income. So, in the most optimistic scenario where China buys our oil without discount and all the countries do what the IRGC wants them to do, our income from this strategy would add up to $25 billion.

That's still about 30%-40% less than what it was before the US naval blockade on Iran. Not to mention that the chance of the first scenario ever happening is pretty unlikely as well because 1. the Strait of Hormuz is leaky, 2. not all countries will pay the IRGC their transit fee, 3. Arabs will soon replace and bypass the Strait of Hormuz in a couple of years.

So, why choose a stupid strategy that reduces your income by about 35% and is unsustainable in the long run? Iran should secure nukes, and guarantee its right to close the Strait of Hormuz in war time. Imposing a transit fee during peace time is unsustainable.
U need to calculate all ships not just oil, so include LNG, cargo etc

$15bn is only for oil

U also need to calculate the fact that the pre war oil money Iran receive is not profit but revenue. There is a cost for getting oil out, moving it, paying wages, maintaining all the equipment etc.

Toll is almost all pure profit.

When I calculated it worked out similar.

And with anything the ideal situation is some pay and some don't so U have some leverage over global markets whilst also generating an income.

Nukes are nice, having them gives u deterrence and helps control the escalation ladder but I don't think it would have stopped USA and Israel attacking Iran.

When Israel attacked Iran in 12 day war, what would Iran have said, "ok now we gonna nuke U guys?" Or when they joint attacked then this year? No they wouldn't, because Iran knows it too would get nukes.

Generally no country will use nukes on the onset of war, only if they get super desperate. But like I said it defiently helps having them, puts U in position of power

Iran is currently partially closing it, potentially making money and normalising it.

If in future Arabs find ways around it, Iran can bomb them pipes/pumping stations.
 
Last edited:
According to the IRI, no USN ship has crossed into the Persian Gulf for several months
and since feb 28th no aircraft carrier dared to sail hormuz strait, neither bab el mandeb (circling africa to avoid it).

aircraft carriers sailing hormuz strait was a relative common thing previous to war, sometimes in the middle of threats. but now i guess the threats are taken more seriously.
 
Pakistan cannot nuke Israel, it does not have the missile weapon and nuclear delivery system capable of striking that far away with a nuclear payload.

Anyway the corrupt Generals of Pakistan are very similar in rationale to the Corrupt Generals of Egypt. They care about self preservation first and retaining power. There is no desire by any general in Egypt or Pakistan to confront Israel in any situation other than a threat to the Holy Sites.
Our army generals and politicians may have many flaws, or corrupt, but they remain committed to their country in one important aspect: despite having a weak economy and against all odds, Pakistan has managed, to build a strong military and become a Nuclear power.
Israel is not a greater military power than India, and when the time comes, Pakistan will show that attacking Arab countries and confronting Pakistan are two very different things. That's the reason they never dare to threaten Pakistan
 
Our army generals and politicians may have many flaws, or corrupt, but they remain committed to their country in one important aspect: despite having a weak economy and against all odds, Pakistan has managed, to build a strong military and become a Nuclear power.
Israel is not a greater military power than India, and when the time comes, Pakistan will show that attacking Arab countries and confronting Pakistan are two very different things. That's the reason they never dare to threaten Pakistan
How is Israel even supposed to attack Pakistan? They are in quite different geographic areas, to put it mildly.:p
 
How is Israel even supposed to attack Pakistan? They are in quite different geographic areas, to put it mildly.:p
they were also going to hit kahuta nuclear plant along with India, in 80's. Israel and India are the biggest enemy of Muslims, but some Muslim countries only consider Israel as threat and hugs India, hence left India to deal by Pakistan only.
 
U need to calculate all ships not just oil, so include LNG, cargo etc

$15bn is only for oil

U also need to calculate the fact that the pre war oil money Iran receive is not profit but revenue. There is a cost for getting oil out, moving it, paying wages, maintaining all the equipment etc.

Toll is almost all pure profit.

When I calculated it worked out similar.

And with anything the ideal situation is some pay and some don't so U have some leverage over global markets whilst also generating an income.

Nukes are nice, having them gives u deterrence and helps control the escalation ladder but I don't think it would have stopped USA and Israel attacking Iran.

When Israel attacked Iran in 12 day war, what would Iran have said, "ok now we gonna nuke U guys?" Or when they joint attacked then this year? No they wouldn't, because Iran knows it too would get nukes.

Generally no country will use nukes on the onset of war, only if they get super desperate. But like I said it defiently helps having them, puts U in position of power

Iran is currently partially closing it, potentially making money and normalising it.

If in future Arabs find ways around it, Iran can bomb them pipes/pumping stations.

Having nukes means you can escalate without fearing a nuclear Armageddon.

The reason Iran hasn’t sunk an aircraft carrier is because that would 100% invite a nuclear strike.

Iran has been forced to restrain its conventional forces because it fears a nuclear strike.

If Iran had nukes US wouldn’t be able to blockade Iran’s cargo ships.

If the mullahs sign another nuclear deal - IRGC should overthrow them.
 
The majority of Arabs around us in the Middle East are our historical enemies. There is no doubt that they will use any opportunity to weaken Iran.

With the exception of only some Iraqis, Kuwaits, Bahrainis and Emiratis, and again, ONLY SOME OF THEM, the rest of Arabs, most notably Saudis and Palestinians, have always been hostile towards Iran and Iranians in the past. Let's not forget that Yaser Arafat publicly sided with Saddam against Iran. Hamas sided with Al-Qaeda against Syria and Hezbollah.

It is the fault of the Islamic Republic for sacrificing our national interests over the Palestinian cause.
Saudis and other arab "kingdoms" are sold away régimes... they sink in time. No need to bother about them...
 
Iran needs to up its game now

take the fight to Zionists

and Russia must start sending the Geran-4/5 to Iran

Geran 5 is basically a cruise missile at a fraction of the cost which can do deadly damage

Russian production of Geran 4/5 now exceeds the production of Geran 2/3 and Shaheed 136

Russian war machine now produces over 7,500 of all types per month

what's a few 1000s to a friend like Iran who gave them Shaheed 136
 

So this ship was moving and didn’t get hit until the mine was under the engine room are these mines remotely controlled if they’re observing these ships kind of sounds like they could be and man these visuals are horrible to be fair I would think the Iranians would have better quality cameras to record such incidents
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top