I am not even understanding one bit of your confused statements.
You engage me, post a reference and try prove that iranian governments or shah was installed. Your rebuttal points to CIA's and MI6's involvement, but that was never my contention, I had said mosad was not part of it, it could not have been at that time.
Seriously, rebuttal or completing your correction?
Yours was a half truth, a partial statement... my side bias... obfuscation.
It wasn't Mossad but another agency.
It was not a rebuttal... it completed your post. However, since you assumed I'm coming over the top and clearly not onside to your point of view, you took it as such...
Yes, clearly... you were not understanding.
Then you go on into how US was okay with installing iranian mullahs rather than having Soviet influence in middle east. Which indirectly supports my assertion that iranian ayatullahs are a C team of zion and are in power because they have been blessed by US and play their part to benefit and support their causes. Plenty of evidence for that for the ones who haven't taken ayatullah's bayt.
Again a half truth... just a convenient half baked dump.
The first coup to remove Mossadegh and second to remove Shah... both had foreign meddling. The difference Mossadegh was popular and his aims were populist. Clearly Brits didn't like him nationalize oil. Second time around Shah was deeply unpopular and people revolted on their own unlike the previous instigated bout.
BOTH TIMES, western fears were a communist takeover. First that Mossadegh may take Iran into Soviet camp and second time, the revolution may install a communist regime.
In both instances, shah rule and subsequent Clerical rule, were assumed better alternatives to communism. An isolated perch.
However, all didn't go as planned. The earlier attempts to appropriate the regime sent mixed signals. Making Iranians apprehensive of US. Fearing another regime change attempt... which later US meddling cemented... having Iran build redundancies... eventhough attempts were made by both sides to come closer... that in spite of the fact that Iraq was used to hollow out or collapse or carve Iran... later sanctions regime made life even tougher and oil sales harder... assets frozen... scientists murdered, stuxnet, sabotage and finally now overt conflict.
In all that, the US bases and overt presence has been across the Gulf in the statlets to implement mideast policy. The regime changes and maritime regimes... financial and technological setup was and is all there...
All of these statelets though very recent have enjoyed unparalleled patronage... by all means... it hasn't been Iran the staging ground for all attacks across mideast.
You are trying to prove that somehow iran is fighting a holy war against zion.
How?
It is your inherent bias that blindsides you... because your faith kicks in...
It was why... trolls are using slang and pejoratives.
Because, they want to be onside to their beliefs first.
Tell me if Iran was communist and not clerical would you still support any fight it mounts against the empire?
To which I gave you real life examples of countries and the state they are in, only because zion felt they were a threat to them. If iran was fighting a holy war against zion it would have been destroyed by now.
Exactly!!!
You're waiting for the nukes to drop.
You don't believe enough has been done and US is holding back because it is just not possible for Iran to survive.
You wouldn't believe your lying eyes and listening ears to the contrary.
Ask anyone if the missiles that dropped on US bases were real or fake? Or was US using fake munitions.
Another thing if it were a religious conflict you'd still be on the wrong...
Just like Saudi clan was onside to British Empire working for the collapse Ottomans... remain the b team to collapse Iran and the rest of Mideast.
There is nothing in vacuum...
From all the fires they've stoked for the rise of zion.
Their house seeks only to them for continued rule.
iranians should be grateful and remain so for many coming decades that Pakistanis and Saudi with Turks showed some maturity and prevented the total destruction of iran. Saudis showed significant restraint and patience in not retaliating to iran's shameless provocations.
This is the funniest thing you said so far...
Quite the opposite in fact.
It is the Iranian restraint keeping things from collapsing. You'll see your lying eyes in coming days what I mean...
If Iranian critical civilian and commercial infrastructure was attacked they would have taken out the Gulfs. The hounds of hell are only watching from a distance because a solution doesn't exist.
Just for example, when zion attacked Iranian South Pars Gas field... your own zion did it to check if in fact Iran will retaliate... they took out Qatar’s gas field the next day
The Qatari fields will remain off line for years to come.
Here's the thing ask Saudis to join in, enough of the restraint... let loose.
I dare them!
You have no answers and wisdom just your misguided loyalty to iran, why because it has successfully fooled you into believing the utter nonsense that they are saviors of Islamic world and champions of the helpless Muslims.
I have no loyalty to Iran, nor am I Shi'i... your whole argument is one based on madkhali faith that Saudis invested hard to foment masses of drones.
PS: I am not one bit frustrated. I am clear in my understanding of persian aims, their intrigues. Unlike you, I do question why would persians want to support a region that was first conquered by a Caliph, whom they curse, hate and abuse the most.
And that is the crux of your argument. Which is not geopolitical at all...
It doesn't understand real world implications ... why zion needs or wants the collapse of Iran...
www.middleeasteye.net
by MDA....not saying MDA troops are on the ground.