Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[AZ_HighCountry]

Because it makes sense to some extent. There's nothing the US can do to Iran for Trump to get his "surrender" which hasn't already been tested.

Now, that doesn't mean that the US will nuke Tehran. But the idea of nuking the Pickaxe Mountain isn't that far-fetched because as you said too, destroying the site with conventional weapons is impossible.

Did I say impossible? Or difficult? Honestly, I don't remember.

Nuking of Pickaxe will have the same degree of difficulty as conventional munitions.

But I still stand by my comment there will be no nuclear strike on Tehran.

Why?

Given the leaks in DOD, any orders that may have been given would have been leaked already. Do not doubt me.

 

[ShapurII]

Did I say impossible? Or difficult? Honestly, I don't remember.

Nuking of Pickaxe will have the same degree of difficulty as conventional munitions.

But I still stand by my comment there will be no nuclear strike on Tehran.

Why?

Given the leaks in DOD, any orders that may have been given would have been leaked already. Do not doubt me.

I don't remember either, but I agree with you that nuking Tehran is out of question.

 

[Mero]

A few Iranian enemies in the Middle East named.

 

[Falcon29]

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

A few Iranian enemies in the Middle East named.

I'd be interested in a list of their friends.

 

[Khorasan Black Flags]

Seems like they're just waiting till after mid terms and getting enough missile defenses in Israel.

This is more clear proof the US administration is prioritizing protection of Israeli cities over lives of US soldiers.

US bases have less defenses, only bunkers. And US allies in GCC also are limited in missile defenses.

What the US placed in Israel + what Israel has is enough to intercept hundreds if not over 1000 ballistic missiles

US is more concerned one building gets hit in Israel than dozens of US soldiers being killed and the rest of the nations energy and power infrastructure going dark

View attachment 221871

Our dysfunctional and incompetent government is slept but our military is alert

 

[Khorasan Black Flags]

GCC

If the attacks are launched from zionist occupied territories then zionist occupied territories are no exception

 

[UKBengali]

What the US placed in Israel + what Israel has is enough to intercept hundreds if not over 1000 ballistic missiles

US is more concerned one building gets hit in Israel than dozens of US soldiers being killed and the rest of the nations energy and power infrastructure going dark

View attachment 221871

After 200-300 Iranian missiles then Zio-US would be "empty' as it takes 2 missiles to have a high probability of hit. Other choice is to rely on 1 interceptor per Iranian missile but then intercept probability declines substantiallly.

Each THAAD battery has 96 interceptors + 1 reload but we know they are partially empty after use in 2024/2025 and again this year. Each USN warship only as 12 SM-3s and Zionist entity is maybe down to around 100 Arrow-3s, as in desperation they started using older Arrow-2 and even David Sling by late March and early April this year.

In last 6 months Zio-US has at most produced just 100 new interceptors when they were using more than this per week when the war was at full swing.

 

[Khorasan Black Flags]

A few Iranian enemies in the Middle East named.

Very good analysis

Saudi and Emirates are workers of zionist entity

 

[Immortals]

 

[Persian Gulf]

 

[Falcon29]

If the attacks are launched from zionist occupied territories then zionist occupied territories are no exception

I agree but in that scenario retailation on Israel in order to be effective would have to be directed at Ben Gurion Airport even civilian part of in my opinion and Tel Aviv city center in particular

Targeting the Negev airbase as has been done since previous rounds provides no value to Iran

 

[SaadH]

Duh! Are you retarded? Of course Pakistan is a Sunni country. What sort of retarded statement is that? Why would I not be honest about stating the obvious?

And yes, Pakistan is a Sunni country, allied with Saudi Arabia. And Saudi Arabia is an eternal enemy of Iran. It has been like that ever since Saudi Arabia was established from the Ottoman Empire. There's a chance for Iran to be strong allies with Israel in the future, but never going to happen with the Saudis. Let that sink in. As long as Pakistan is a Saudi ally, there will be no such thing as friendship between Iran and Pakistan. The only side that needs to be honest is the Pakistanis and admit that they have already chosen their side.

Iran had pretty cordial relations with Saudis during Shah regime, things only went south after the revolution especially after Iranian Mullah's tried to export their revolution into Saudi.

 

[Falcon29]

 

[ShapurII]

Iran had pretty cordial relations with Saudis during Shah regime, things only went south after the revolution especially after Iranian Mullah's tried to export their revolution into Saudi.

That's not completely true. Iran had cordial, brotherly relations with Saudi Arabia when King Faisal was in power. And we all know what happened to him in 1975.