Armament of the Russian Army
- Thread starter Soldier35
- Start date
NGAD IS THE BEST
Elite Member
You're more loyal to Russia than China, if you're Chinese which I don't think you're
Yommie
Elite Member
Russia is Chinese client state. I'm Chinese. I love Russia.
NGAD IS THE BEST
Elite Member
There is no client no significant order from Russia, your 99.9999% posts are on Russian military equipment only 0.0001% are on Chinese military equipment, No you're not Chinese but definately false flag Russian who pretending to be Chinese
NGAD IS THE BEST
Elite Member
These latest Russian junks cannot hold and sustain the rather raw Ukrainian weapons, even they can't hold/sustain their own vintage soviet era weapons that Ukraine have it lol
BigGazza
Registered Member
Russia and China have each others back, and fully recognise that mutual support is essential in defending their national aspirations against the ruthless machinations of the (failing) Western globalist hegemony controlled by neoliberal capitalist class.
The strategic synergies between Russia and China are exceptional, and united they are vastly more powerful than if they acted alone. From the Chinese point of view, alliance with Russia provides impenetrable security in their rear, securing their vast Northern frontier, and freeing them up concentrate on the challenge from the "Obama Pivot" to Asia where the US is openly attempting to bottle up China behind the 1st and 2nd island chains (that they are attempting to consolidate under their control thru dominion over quislings in places like Phillipines) and threatening Chinas sea lanes of communication and their ability to import/export.
Russia has a vast surplus of non-GM agricultural commodities and bountiful reserves of energy & minerals that they can extract at low production costs, all the things that the Chinese industrial powerhouse needs. Russia is a ready and willing purchaser of Chinese consumer and industrial goods, and shows respect for Chinese society and culture. The West is desperate to break this synergy and the geopoltical/geoeconomic alliance that has developed, and the endless puking of stupid Russia-and-China-hate from our corrupt closed-minded scribbler class has to be seen in this light. Scribbler-monkeys are working overtime to please their paymasters and keep the cheques coming in before the lights start to go off...
NGAD IS THE BEST
Elite Member
show your REAL FLAG dudeRussia and China have each others back, and fully recognise that mutual support is essential in defending their national aspirations against the ruthless machinations of the (failing) Western globalist hegemony controlled by neoliberal capitalist class.
The strategic synergies between Russia and China are exceptional, and united they are vastly more powerful than if they acted alone. From the Chinese point of view, alliance with Russia provides impenetrable security in their rear, securing their vast Northern frontier, and freeing them up concentrate on the challenge from the "Obama Pivot" to Asia where the US is openly attempting to bottle up China behind the 1st and 2nd island chains (that they are attempting to consolidate under their control thru dominion over quislings in places like Phillipines) and threatening Chinas sea lanes of communication and their ability to import/export.
Russia has a vast surplus of non-GM agricultural commodities and bountiful reserves of energy & minerals that they can extract at low production costs, all the things that the Chinese industrial powerhouse needs. Russia is a ready and willing purchaser of Chinese consumer and industrial goods, and shows respect for Chinese society and culture. The West is desperate to break this synergy and the geopoltical/geoeconomic alliance that has developed, and the endless puking of stupid Russia-and-China-hate from our corrupt closed-minded scribbler class has to be seen in this light. Scribbler-monkeys are working overtime to please their paymasters and keep the cheques coming in before the lights start to go off...
BigGazza
Registered Member
It will be very intersting to see how the Russians proceed with T-14 (and the general Armata vehicle family) once the SMO is wound up. T-14 encapsulates pre-SMO military thinking but that was based on war experiences before the advent of drones and the all-new tactical doctrines that have since sprung up.
This more than anything explains the pause in T-14 mass rollouts. The military world is now in a transition, similar to the 1930s where the rise of carrier aviation had made the Dreadnought-class battleship essentially obsolete, yet Navy Brass from around the world had yet to grasp this fact. War has changed, and the lessons of the SMO will dictate how Russias next generation of AFVs will evolve.
Let the NAFOs sneer like drooling idiots.
Hopefully the Pentagram will remain stuck in their establishment groupthink and keep producing yesterdays gear like 1970s-origin outdated birds like F-15/F-16 and sinking their cash into maintaining a fleet of 100k flat-tops that can't safely approach Iranian waters...
NGAD IS THE BEST
Elite Member
And Ru AF has 70 era SU-30 and Mig-29 junks also what crap you're talking , they also 1000+ 5th gen jets like F-22/F-35, What Russia have no more than 14 Su-57, kid Russian ship is sinking in the Mariana trench foreverLet the NAFOs sneer like drooling idiots.
BigGazza
Registered Member
Your wish is my command....
Ex-Brit Aussie who has seen the light and now wishes nothing more than to witness the collapse of the disgusting warmongering imperialist Globalist Neocapitalist Empire that falsely masquerades as liberal humanitarian democracies.
BTW the "NGAD" is not "best" but is likely to prove to be the same under-performing over-priced over-hyped POS that the Fail-35 has proved to be. Chinese have 2x different 6G prototypes flying and where is the hyperwunderwaffe of the Exceptionalists? Nowhere except in the fantasies of the NAFOs
BigGazza
Registered Member
70x Flanker & fulcrum variants?
Only 14 Felons? In reality its about ~220 older Su27/30, plus ~140 Su-35S air-superority and ~160 Su-34 fighter-bombers. Add ~100 active Fulcrums (ignoring naval units or the odd few MiG-35). S-57 numbers is had togauge but ~50 is probably not far from the mark.Thats 670 warplanes, not including airframes in storage or in reserve... thats an active force greater than UK, France and Germany combined (which is ~622).
I won't bother adding Russias bomber fleet, which Eurotrash simply don't have...
You must be ex-military cuz only they can be so obstinate in their refusal to accept realities.
BTW, unlike the West, Russians don't relay solely on air-power as their main punch. They are demolishing Ukraine infrastructure piece-by-piece without as much as a single manned warbird visible over/near the targets - all strikes are either air-launched stand-off weapons, or missiles, or drones.
The West has lots of fighters because they totally lack any effective IADS.
NATO drones in Ukromonkey hands get fired against Russia in the HUNDREDS every day, across a frontline that is 1500kms long, yet >99% of them are interecepted, mostly well before they get anywhere close to the targets. Do the same against NATO (or the continental US) and 99% of those same drones would get through. NATO/US AD covergae is useless and would be concentated on vital facilities, leaving the rest of the airspace to be defended by manned fighters. When drones go stray in Ukropistan and drift into NATO space they struggle to intercept even a small handful. They will clearly be overwhelmed immediately in the event of mass attacks by hundreds of drones in a dispersed swarm.
NATO planners have fantasized about taking down Russia with vast swarms of drones to overwhelm AD, but the Russians have managed and triumphed. The West on the other hand is critically vulnerable to the very attack modes that they have pioneered
Yeah... NATO has lots of warbirds... but warfare is changing and that massive investment looks a lot like the battleship/cruiser-heavy British navy in the inter-war years. Behind the times, and no longer what national "defense" actually needs...
NGAD IS THE BEST
Elite Member
Your wish is my command....
Ex-Brit Aussie who has seen the light and now wishes nothing more than to witness the collapse of the disgusting warmongering imperialist Globalist Neocapitalist Empire that falsely masquerades as liberal humanitarian democracies.
BTW the "NGAD" is not "best" but is likely to prove to be the same under-performing over-priced over-hyped POS that the Fail-35 has proved to be. Chinese have 2x different 6G prototypes flying and where is the hyperwunderwaffe of the Exceptionalists? Nowhere except in the fantasies of the NAFOs
Kid kid what you're smoking, opium I think, China still behind in few fields with USA, especially in jet engine development fields, and can I show you how many Su-35 and 34 destroyed by Ukraine with their Soviet era vintage SAMs, before the arrival of US patriot and can I show you TU-22M3 was destroyed by Soviet era SAM, Can I show you few Su-57 damage on Russian airbase by cheap drone attack, Recently they manage to destroy one of Su-57 on same airbase, Can show you few Tu-160 were damage in Elgin air bases near Ukrainian border with cheap drone attack, Can I show you how much causalities and armored vehicles were destroyed by Ukrainian forces70x Flanker & fulcrum variants?
Thats 670 warplanes, not including airframes in storage or in reserve... thats an active force greater than UK, France and Germany combined (which is ~622).
I won't bother adding Russias bomber fleet, which Eurotrash simply don't have...
You must be ex-military cuz only they can be so obstinate in their refusal to accept realities.
BTW, unlike the West, Russians don't relay solely on air-power as their main punch. They are demolishing Ukraine infrastructure piece-by-piece without as much as a single manned warbird visible over/near the targets - all strikes are either air-launched stand-off weapons, or missiles, or drones.
The West has lots of fighters because they totally lack any effective IADS.
NATO drones in Ukromonkey hands get fired against Russia in the HUNDREDS every day, across a frontline that is 1500kms long, yet >99% of them are interecepted, mostly well before they get anywhere close to the targets. Do the same against NATO (or the continental US) and 99% of those same drones would get through. NATO/US AD covergae is useless and would be concentated on vital facilities, leaving the rest of the airspace to be defended by manned fighters. When drones go stray in Ukropistan and drift into NATO space they struggle to intercept even a small handful. They will clearly be overwhelmed immediately in the event of mass attacks by hundreds of drones in a dispersed swarm.
NATO planners have fantasized about taking down Russia with vast swarms of drones to overwhelm AD, but the Russians have managed and triumphed. The West on the other hand is critically vulnerable to the very attack modes that they have pioneered
Yeah... NATO has lots of warbirds... but warfare is changing and that massive investment looks a lot like the battleship/cruiser-heavy British navy in the inter-war years. Behind the times, and no longer what national "defense" actually needs...
And why you think Russian economy is not suffering because of war, most of their upgrade projects of their military equipment either delayed or cancelled indefinitely because of lack of funds, similarly their next gen naval/air and army projects are cancelled
you're not ex British veteran but definitely either you're false flag Russian or Chinese, and don't live in your utopia and fairytales that Russia is wining this useless war started by Russia lol
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
-
-
Federal cabinet gives nod to imposition of emergency in KP; summary sent to president (35 Viewers)- Latest: Watandar
-
-
-
Country Watch Latest
Latest Posts
-
-
-
-
Nvidia opens investigation after CEO Jensen Huang’s affair with alleged Chinese spy (14 Viewers)
- Latest: tower9
-
