Pakistan Among the Top 10 Military Powers According to Global Firepower Report 2024

My list would be as follows
  1. USA
  2. CHINA
  3. RUSSIA
  4. INDIA
  5. JAPAN
  6. FRANCE
  7. UK
  8. SOUTH KOREA
  9. ISRAEL
  10. PAKISTAN
 
the list is bull
France should be there , above UK
They have a better Army and Airforce than UK

Nope .... learn about worldwide military before talking

Royal Air Force is better than French Air Force

Thanks to Eurofighters and F-35s

stealth F-35 easly can beat RAFALE in BVR combat

French Air Force lack stealth Platform until 2040s
 
Last edited:
Learn how to make an engine first. Oh wait- you asked the Brits, Ukrainians for help in developing one, but I thought you said y'all make everything yourself.

Turkiye itself has developed turbofan Engine to power KIZILELMA and ANKA-3 unmanned stealth Fighter Jets

even 2 x TF-10.000 turbofan Engines can power HURJET Fighter Jet

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



Also 35.000 lbf turbofan Engine under development and nothing to do with British
 
Pakistan has submarine launched Cruise missiles tipped with a Nuclear device.

Turkiye ain't in the big league son, move on, chop chop.
Dont worry about him. He is a Turkish nationalist that had problems with people of every nationality on the old PDF.
 
Dont worry about him. He is a Turkish nationalist that had problems with people of every nationality on the old PDF.
I know bro, unlike many of the Pakistanis here who suffer from self hating syndrome, I won't havethis fool blabber here.
 
What we see in Hollywood movies will come true in the next decade


USA , Turkiye , France, China developing biologically engineered supersoldiers and unmanned robotic Systems


This robot will turn into super soldiers in the next decade
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


View attachment 59461
View attachment 59462
View attachment 59463
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



People still believe the Terminator film was science fiction, but it was a documentary about our future.


Agreed...and Ukraine has validated much of it.

Just think they have these cheap disposable tiny killer drones lurking overhead picking off vehicles and individual soldiers with ZERO risk.

Why spend $100M on a single manned fighter jet (which you are afraid to use due to AA) when you can use that money to create a disposable gargantuan robotic army that can wreak far more damage and fear than that single jet.

Now if you were going to buy 200 jets...multiple that gargantuan army by 200.
 
Why spend $100M on a single manned fighter jet (which you are afraid to use due to AA) when you can use that money to create a disposable gargantuan robotic army

Not only killer Drones
but also unmanned stealth Fighter Jets are FUTURE

For example cheaper but lethal platform such as Turkish KIZILELMA unmanned stealth Fighter Jet ... only USA-Europe-China-Turkiye develops this technology

-- NO Risk to lose Pilot
-- Cheaper
-- More lethal with stealth technology


to kill all 4,5 gen Fighter Jets F-15 , F-16V , RAFALE , SU-35 , J-10C in BVR combat

This killer machine is coming
1723645601984.jpeg

Also to hunt Air Defense Systems for DEAD-SEAD role

even to attack on Naval platforms Frigates -Destroyers - Aircraft Carriers
 
Last edited:
Not only killer Drones
but also unmanned stealth Fighter Jets are FUTURE

For example cheaper but lethal platform such as Turkish KIZILELMA unmanned stealth Fighter Jet ... only USA-Europe-China-Turkiye develops this technology

-- NO Risk to lose Pilot
-- Cheaper
-- More lethal with stealth technology


to kill all 4,5 gen Fighter Jets F-15 , F-16V , RAFALE , SU-35 , J-10C in BVR combat

This killer machine is coming
View attachment 59513

The great thing about unmanned planes is all you have to do is heavily armor key parts.

For instance if it was a manned plane you could create defensive drones that would fling thousands of ball bearings into the path of oncoming fighter jets to smash the windshield...but obviously unmanned ones wont have this problem. You'd have to target the engine intakes and I'm sure since they are unmanned they could put deployable covers over them which would be risky in a manned jet but obviously not in a unmanned one.
 
Tactical advantages and economics matter more than overall numbers.

Proven in Ukraine


And Nuclear Weapons can not be used

Proven in Ukraine again

so Countries like Pakistan needs modern conventional weapons instead of saying Pakistan is a nuclear power

Also Trillion Dollars Economy
 
And Nuclear Weapons can not be used

Proven in Ukraine again

so Countries like Pakistan needs modern conventional weapons instead of saying Pakistan is a nuclear power
Nuclear weapons can be used only in certain contexts.

Ukraine is an extention of NATO, that's the only issue.
 
Nuclear weapons can be used only in certain contexts.

Ukraine is an extention of NATO, that's the only issue.

Ukraine is not a NATO member
and Nobody can use nuclear weapons against Russia, if Russia use nuclear weapons on Ukraine

This is not 1940s
Nobody can use nuclear weapons ... including Russia

Nuclear Weapons will be used in WW3 ... as like used in WW2
 
And Nuclear Weapons can not be used

Proven in Ukraine again
If Russia didn’t have nuclear weapons, a U.S.-led coalition could have dealt with Russia in Ukraine just as they did with Iraq in 1991—swiftly and decisively. Iraq had no nuclear deterrent, so when it invaded Kuwait, the international response was immediate and overwhelming, reversing the invasion in a matter of weeks. If Turkey tried something similar against Greece, they’d face the same kind of response: a no-fly zone and military action almost instantly. But Russia’s nuclear arsenal changes everything. Those nukes are the only reason they’ve been able to invade a sovereign country like Ukraine without facing the full force of US in a conventional war. Without them, Russia would have been stopped long ago. Thinking otherwise is just ignoring reality.
 
Just like you get tech transfer thanks to being a NATO state.

Just like Turkiye, all of the tech came from NATO and y'all built on it.
Pakistan has always dreamt of being a NATO member like Turkey, but the U.S. and the West never saw Pakistan as an equal partner like Turkey
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top