Vote Dr. Jill Stein as a protest against the Zionist Israeli Genocide of the Palestinians
- Thread starter clutch
- Start date
Cookie Monster
Trusted Member
While I would love to have another option besides Kamala or Trump(I don’t care for either of them…both are sold out corrupt ppl)…
…it’s also true that Jill Stein doesn’t stand a chance…
…and if u follow her speeches, interviews, etc. U will see that she doesn’t really have a consistent position on several issues. She just panders(telling ppl what they wanna hear) while trying to differentiate herself from the conventional(democrat/republican) candidates.
Despite that I would have considered a third party candidate like her(just to steer away from the current two options)…still the chances of her winning are slim to none.
FuturePAF
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
That’s why it’s a protest vote. It’s to show the democrat party that it can’t take people for granted. It has to address grievances at least somewhat.
Cookie Monster
Trusted Member
Trump won his term before against Hillary in this same manner…
…a bunch of democrat voters were furious how the Democratic Party sidelined Bernie Sanders and brought Hillary Clinton out as their candidate.
Same would happen if protest voting concept is used again. Either it would harm Trump and Kamala would win…or It would harm Kamala and Trump would win(depends on which voters end up protest voting).
- If a democrat was considering voting for Kamala…as a lesser of two evils…but then chose to protest vote instead. This would mean Trump wins(from that democrat’s perspective, greater of the two evils) and his/her protest vote is partially to blame.
- If a republican was considering voting for Trump…as a lesser of two evils…but then chose to protest vote instead. This would mean Kamala wins(from that republican’s perspective, greater of the two evils)…and his/her protest vote is partially to blame.
halupridol
Registered Member
America so bad,,,that I can't stand to leave it for my real country.
I brave,izzatdar,honest n very religious.
I always speak truth ,,,,,,,on internet.
Who am I?
I am BHAYYA.
I brave,izzatdar,honest n very religious.
I always speak truth ,,,,,,,on internet.
Who am I?
I am BHAYYA.
FuturePAF
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
It’s the democrat votes more likely to protest vote in this election. Kamala has made overtures to black men voters but doesn’t think she needs to with people protesting the war in Palestine. Should she lose and it comes down to Gaza, the democrats will get hostile at first but then will eventually have to accept they can’t do nothing.
maverick
Trusted Member
when u are raised again before Allah, how would u answer, if he asked did u stand with the innocent and persecuted or did u favor the persecutor… voting for kamila or trump is favoring the persecutor.. its your choice how u deal with Allah that day
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
I dont undestand the USA system but could her group not win "some" seats in the senate/congress such that Jill can become a power broker? She wont wint out right, but is there a chance she can make a difference?
Yommie
Elite Member
clutch
Elite Member
- Thread starter
- #15
Choosing the lesser of two evils, is still choosing evil at the end.
If Jill Stein wins 5% of the vote, under US Law, she is entitled to Federal Funds and an equal platform as the other two parties. We can make it happen.
The U.S. law that addresses the eligibility of third-party candidates for federal funds in presidential elections is part of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), specifically under the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act (26 U.S.C. § 9004).
According to the law:
- A third-party candidate is eligible for federal funds if they receive at least 5% of the popular vote in the general election. This threshold qualifies them for retroactive public funding for the next election cycle. This means they would receive federal funding after the election in which they achieve this 5% threshold, which they can use for future campaign activities.
- Major party candidates (from the Democratic or Republican parties) are automatically eligible for federal matching funds for their primary campaigns and receive general election funding upfront, but third-party or independent candidates must first reach that 5% threshold before becoming eligible for future funds.
