Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

no proof for that claim, could be propaganda

whether they entered Iranian airspace or not, they delivered multiple precise hits to many of the most strategic buildings deep in Iran, doing real damage that will take a long time and a lot of money to fix

Their is no need for Israeli planes to enter Iranian airspace, they can use long range missles.
Hi,

To save themselves---china will have to fight the wars of other nations with their military---.

They can't stay on the sidelines and pray that US does not attack.

China needs to defend its allies just like Usa does. Soon China will have to do it otherwise usa and allies will choke China economy and trade.
 
Bulgarian military analysis.

Iran counters Israel attacks with 100km-range air defense missiles​

By Boyko Nikolov On Oct 26, 2024


Share

In a dramatic escalation of tensions, Iranian air defense units successfully intercepted several missiles launched by Israel during the early hours of October 26. This response came shortly after Israeli forces executed a series of missile strikes targeting the Iranian capital, Tehran. While the scale of the assault was relatively small, preliminary reports indicate that Iranian forces effectively neutralized all incoming threats.

Over 3,000 Iranian ballistic missiles threaten Israel's security
Video screenshot

Conflicting accounts have emerged regarding the number of waves in which Israel launched its attacks. While Western and Israeli sources differ, Iranian reports suggest multiple waves were involved. Israel’s strategy relied on long-range air-launched missiles, fired from positions well outside Iranian airspace, minimizing the risk to its aircraft.

Hours prior to the Israeli operation, Russian officials alerted Iran to the impending strikes, sharing intelligence about potential targets and Israeli maneuvers, according to sources who spoke with Sky News Arabia. This collaboration underscores Russia’s commitment to maintaining regional stability and aiding Iran in preparing its defenses. Despite sustaining damage to military installations in Tehran, Khuzestan, and Ilam provinces—resulting in the tragic loss of two Iranian soldiers—Iranian authorities reported that their air defenses intercepted many of the attacking missiles.

Israel permanently suspends combat flights with the F-16Cs
Photo credit: IAF
According to Axios, Israel directly communicated with Iran through intermediaries before the strikes, urging restraint and warning of a stronger retaliation if civilian casualties occurred. On October 25, Dutch Foreign Minister Kaspar Veldkamp also called for de-escalation during a conversation with his Iranian counterpart. The following day, the Israeli Defense Forces declared the successful completion of their air operation, which targeted air defense systems and missile production facilities while intentionally avoiding nuclear and oil infrastructure to focus solely on military objectives.


Iran condemned the Israeli strikes as a breach of international law, asserting its right to self-defense under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. Whether Iran will retaliate remains uncertain; sources from Sky News Arabia indicate that Iran signaled, through intermediaries, a decision to refrain from immediate retaliation, while reports from Tasnim suggest that Tehran is ready to respond and cautioned that Israel would face a proportional counteraction.

Simultaneously, the United States urged Iran to halt its aggressive actions, warning that continued hostilities could lead to American support for Israel’s defense and potential consequences if tensions escalate further.

Greece has Soviet S-300, but will not be sanctioned, the US said
Photo credit: AFP
Israel’s strategy mirrors past operations against Syrian targets, particularly following the downing of an Israeli F-16I by a Syrian S-200 missile in 2018. Leaked U.S. intelligence also suggests that Israel may be contemplating the use of long-range air-launched ballistic missiles against Iranian positions.


In response to the initial wave of attacks, Iranian forces deployed medium-range surface-to-air missiles [SAMs] to counter the Israeli missiles. For subsequent strikes, Iran utilized long-range defense systems capable of intercepting missiles from distances exceeding 100 kilometers—an important advancement.

Among Iran’s air defense arsenal are upgraded Russian-made S-300PMU-2 systems, known for their advanced interception capabilities. While the standard 48N6E2 missiles have a range of 200 kilometers, these systems are reportedly compatible with the more advanced 48N6DM missiles, which boast interception ranges of up to 250 kilometers and are designed to counter hypersonic threats.

Israel permanently suspends combat flights with the F-16Cs - barak israel
Photo credit: IAF
Iran acquired these upgraded S-300 missiles in 2020, speculated to include the 48N6DM variant, which has successfully been tested by China against targets traveling faster than Mach 8 at a range of 250 kilometers—outperforming Israel’s air-launched missile technology.


In addition to the S-300 systems, Iran has a diverse array of long-range air defense capabilities. Its Soviet-era S-200D system, dating back to the 1990s, remains one of the longest-ranged options, capable of engaging targets at distances up to 300 kilometers. Although modernized for enhanced mobility, the S-200 is primarily designed to defend against larger threats like ballistic missiles rather than smaller aerial targets.

Iran’s most advanced domestically developed air defense system, the Bavar-373, reportedly reached an impressive range of 300 kilometers as of April, following the integration of the new Sayyad-4B missile. This system may have played a critical role in recent interceptions. Another homegrown system, the Khordad 15, offers a lighter alternative to the Bavar-373, with an engagement range exceeding 100 kilometers, although details about its deployment remain limited.

Iran unveils the two-silo AD-200 SAM firing Sayyad-4 Mach 5 missile
Photo credit: Army Recognition
Iran’s reliance on ground-based air defenses is largely attributed to its constrained inventory of modern fighter aircraft. This multi-layered defense network poses a significant challenge to Israel and its allies, reinforcing Iran’s extensive missile deterrent strategy. The sophisticated integration of these ground defenses with cutting-edge electronic warfare and radar systems further bolsters Iran’s defensive posture in the region.

 
I am willing to guess that Iran will retaliate for this Israeli attack, but Iran will not go for Israeli lives, nut the IRGC is going to cripple Israel's Military industrial complex, which is CRITICAL- knocking out Israel's weapons now will slow down Israel's rate of genociding its neighbors.
Was the 1 October 2024 retaliatory attack with around 200 ballistic not enough to cripple Zion's Military Industrial Complex?

According to the US in 2022, Iran had 3,000 ballistic missiles including short-range, medium-range and long-range.

Suppose 1,000 are long-range. Would they be enough to do any significant damage to Zion if 200 ballistic missiles only did such minimal damage?

By the way, Zion's Military Industrial Complex is mainly based in the United States and Europe.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Looks like Neutrino might have changed your mind from Lora to quadcopter

Israel did not use any missiles beyond 100 km
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Israel's attacks were precise and effective (though not as impactful as the Israeli propaganda is suggesting)

Iran's attacks were imprecise and ineffective, though had a major psychological impact on Israeli society (majority of population sent to bomb shelters) and was very expensive to defend against


Again

Hitting exactly the hangars and taxiways for 42 times is pretty accurate.

It is more effective than hitting empty above ground buildings.
 
Anything concrete regarding the S-300? How many, if any, are currently operational?
Also, the aitelly video posted earlier stated that bavar seems to have done better than s-300 and seems to have survived. I think there were sat images on one bavar battery in operation. Anything new on either of these systems?
Azerbaijan claimed to have destroyed seven S-300 launchers back in 2020 during its war with Armenia.

This system seems to become an easy target for modern aerial vehicles.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Image of the radar site Israel hit


We expected OTH radars to be a peace time solution.

They are excellent radars for peace time

How can we protect an OTH radar on the western border?
We cannot. Only putting a BIG cost for hitting them.

This is the most important satellite picture for me so far.

This will need a reprisal attack because OTH radar on Iraq border can not be protected ever.
 
what a none sense , "definitely" haha... can i laugh in your face ? show me just one source that is not a random twitter channel that made such claims,

not even israeli news outlet claim this or their government made such claims,

just show me one government official claiming "we penetrated their airspace with our F35´s"

its pretty much known how the attack was done (with air launched ballistic missiles) over iraq.

Ga1iCwXWsAEXVTJ
I don’t believe anything being claimed on news is talking to the actual route or otherwise. After all, even what you show is a random twitter news channel is it not?
 
If this is true it makes sense, it's basically a warning to back off or the next strike can hit you anywhere.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If this is true it makes sense, it's basically a warning to back off or the next strike can hit you anywhere.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


If true, next step is full force attack on Iran not tweeting about it.

If they are not attacking it is because it is not true
 
Last edited:
They need to keep attacking the airbases as these are the backbone of Israeli defense.

It is difficult to do that outside of a full war including infrastructure war.

Next steps would be all refineries in the region plus gas line to Greece will be attacked.

Desalination plants in the region will be hit.

NATO will be involved.
 
If true, next step is full force attack on Iran not tweeting about it.
You are really stupid to share this crap. Go play a video game, watch a movie, go for a walk outside but don't come and post false garbage like that on a military forum. Get rid of it please
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top