Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

[Shawnee]

show us the evidence of the direct impacts on buildings you claim to have seen

I won't hold my breath

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Shawnee]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

The Iranian aim was maybe mistakenly to alert and not to damage.

Because Israel can also damage backed by US dollar

 

[Musings]

Next bit of trolling will result in a thread ban

 

[Mehdipersian]

show us the evidence of the direct impacts on buildings you claim to have seen

I won't hold my breath

The complete pictures of the Israeli bases have not been released yet.

I don't know why I have to write this for you every time

 

[Mehdipersian]

The most important reason why Iranian missiles are attractive to Russia is their high number and very reasonable price. Their quality and accuracy are also acceptable. Iran can easily use a large number of these missiles for normal attacks.

 

[UKBengali]

The complete pictures of the Israeli bases have not been released yet.

I don't know why I have to write this for you every time

Tel Nof airbase took some at least moderate damage and that is why satellite pictures are yet to be released - a huge fireball was seen that implied seconday ignition/explosion. They were quick to release Nevatim with some admittedly minor damage which gives credence that they want to hide what happened at Tel Nof.

All evidence suggests that Iran did as much if not more damage to the entity during October. Iran had one severely damaged OTH radar and the other damage looks minor.

We also cannot compare damage from two strikes as it is a boxing contest.

What matters is how much each side was able to degrade the others defensive/offensive capability.

It is pretty obvious that Iran emptied a significant chunk of the Zio-US Arrow interceptors on October 1st. Iran could choose to hit with 2 missile salvos of 200 each for TP3 and get almost 100% hits on the 2nd salvo as Zio-US will be out of interceptors by then.

 

[Persian Gulf]

The complete pictures of the Israeli bases have not been released yet.

I don't know why I have to write this for you every time

he claimed he saw them already, how did he see them if the complete pictures were not released yet?

 

[jauk]

he claimed he saw them already, how did he see them if the complete pictures were not released yet?

Of course there was serious damage. Why would you believe otherwise?

 

[Persian Gulf]

Of course there was serious damage. Why would you believe otherwise?

you made the claim

I asked you to prove it

still waiting

 

[Immortals]

Reminder today (22nd) that the NOTAM covering Shahrud started till 26th.

Curious to see what happens

 

[tsunset]

Obviously. But fanboys thought Russia wanted our missiles for its technology. Russia just saw our missiles as a cheap alternative to fill its reservoir as I said.

But even that is under a big question mark now. I mean you can say what you want, but if that is the destruction of our missiles, then even it's cost-effectiveness cannot be taken for granted. We should wait for True Promise III to find out. This time there is no excuse for "we wanted to cause no destruction".

Russian missiles being "better" or having better technology is not supposed to be surprise for anyone, besides people living in delusions or trusting all the western propaganda fed to them like NAFO shills

Russia has been making rockets, missiles, space launch vehicles of all sorts since nearly a century, Iran only started after the revolution because it was forced to, Russia has a massive manpower number and funds, R&D, this is useless to compare Russian and Iranian missile technology, one has a 50 year difference of experience acquired and the other only started its program because it was forced to

Ukrainians and westerners (as well as ultra pro Iran people) can say whatever about Russian missiles, that they are too disproportionate, that they have poor precision, that they are not cost effective, that they are only meant to kill civilians, Russia is in the game since as early as WW2 and has by far the best missile industry in the world, look at how many different ICBMs/IRBMs and CMs, AshCM, AD missiles, hypersonic missiles they made, we're talking about the first country that send a man into space and its domain of predilection being missiles and rocket technology

Russia in Ukraine doesn't care of the missile performances or its speed, for them if it explodes, do decent damage with okay precision at a low price and in quantity, they will get them, they do not care of the technology, if it does damage, they buy them like they bought kn-23 missiles

Iranian missile debris in Ukraine is only a question of time

 

[Lulldapull]

Russian missiles being "better" or having better technology is not supposed to be surprise for anyone, besides people living in delusions or trusting all the western propaganda fed to them like NAFO shills

Russia has been making rockets, missiles, space launch vehicles of all sorts since nearly a century, Iran only started after the revolution because it was forced to, Russia has a massive manpower number and funds, R&D, this is useless to compare Russian and Iranian missile technology, one has a 50 year difference of experience acquired and the other only started its program because it was forced to

Ukrainians and westerners (as well as ultra pro Iran people) can say whatever about Russian missiles, that they are too disproportionate, that they have poor precision, that they are not cost effective, that they are only meant to kill civilians, Russia is in the game since as early as WW2 and has by far the best missile industry in the world, look at how many different ICBMs/IRBMs and CMs, AshCM, AD missiles, hypersonic missiles they made, we're talking about the first country that send a man into space and its domain of predilection being missiles and rocket technology

Russia in Ukraine doesn't care of the missile performances or its speed, for them if it explodes, do decent damage with okay precision at a low price and in quantity, they will get them, they do not care of the technology, if it does damage, they buy them like they bought kn-23 missiles

Iranian missile debris in Ukraine is only a question of time

So many vidz captured from the targeted Ukrainian facilities on cctv of Russian iskunders or that Smerch long range artillery rocket show them with huge CEPs. Missing by as much as 50m easy.

It’s just embarrassing no? Maybe from the GPS jamming/spoofing?

Only good thing the Russians have today is that lancet and their Glonass guided artillery in a tactical/ battlefield role……I struggle to see anything else of value other than their titanium hulled subs/ naval reactors and their heavier SLVs which are useful to Iran. There’s not much Iran would buy from em today.

 

[Kyussis]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

This is a view of the landing of a missile that Ukraine claims is a Russian ICBM.
It appears to be on a different level of speed and power than the missile used by Iran.
In comparison, the Iranian missile looks like a miniature.
If Iran had such weapons, the attitude of the U.S. and Israel toward Iran would surely be different.
Iran's missile industry still has a lot of work to do.

The U.S. has pointed out that this missile is actually an MRBM.
This difference in power is quite striking, as the missile belongs to the same MRBM class used by Iran in its attack on Israel.

Curious. have you seen the Satellite imagery to see what the Russians actually hit on the ground?

 

[UKBengali]

Russian missiles being "better" or having better technology is not supposed to be surprise for anyone, besides people living in delusions or trusting all the western propaganda fed to them like NAFO shills

Russia has been making rockets, missiles, space launch vehicles of all sorts since nearly a century, Iran only started after the revolution because it was forced to, Russia has a massive manpower number and funds, R&D, this is useless to compare Russian and Iranian missile technology, one has a 50 year difference of experience acquired and the other only started its program because it was forced to

Ukrainians and westerners (as well as ultra pro Iran people) can say whatever about Russian missiles, that they are too disproportionate, that they have poor precision, that they are not cost effective, that they are only meant to kill civilians, Russia is in the game since as early as WW2 and has by far the best missile industry in the world, look at how many different ICBMs/IRBMs and CMs, AshCM, AD missiles, hypersonic missiles they made, we're talking about the first country that send a man into space and its domain of predilection being missiles and rocket technology

Russia in Ukraine doesn't care of the missile performances or its speed, for them if it explodes, do decent damage with okay precision at a low price and in quantity, they will get them, they do not care of the technology, if it does damage, they buy them like they bought kn-23 missiles

Iranian missile debris in Ukraine is only a question of time

In terms of overall missile tech:

1. China = US > small lead for China as it has successfully developed HGV.

2. Russia

3. India = Iran > Iran leads in SAMs and India in SLVs.

 

[SteppeWolff]

So many vidz captured from the targeted Ukrainian facilities on cctv of Russian iskunders or that Smerch long range artillery rocket show them with huge CEPs. Missing by as much as 50m easy.

There are many videos of Iskanders doing pinpoint strikes such as on HIMARS launcher. If you really belive Iskanders are shoddy, you are in for a surprise.