Syrian Civil War and The future of Syria after liberation

Yes and he also said "we don't want anything that doesn't belong to us,we only want what is ours" and then pops a map with half the Aegean and the EEZ of Syria,Lebanon and Cyprus 😂

Yes, your EEZ map is BS, its not a fair division. sorry. lol
 
At the start of the Syrian Civil War, they used the chaos and bring 3 towns under their control. Afrin, Ayn Al Arab (Kobane), Kamışlı. We invited their leader Salih Müslim to Ankara and spoke with him.

Basically we said, we can support you if you want but we have 3 conditions.
- You will sever all links with PKK.
- You will not cooperate with the regime.
- You will not clash with rebel forces for more area.

They declined and go their own way. Then ISIS emerged and they were about to crushed in Kobane. US came and saved their asses used them as their cannon fodder against ISIS. They grow bold with US support.

Again we said, "Look status will change and US will leave some day, they are not permanent here but we are when the US leaves we are gonna crush you and your dreams like a bug"

Again they didn't mind.

Status changed, we crushed them on Tell Rıfat then Mambij, now FSA passed Euphrates river and we are raining bombs on them.

Stupid fvcks........
Why are they so obsessed with PKK? Are they ideologically brothers? Sure I've seen photos of YPG with Oçalan's photo, but they also seem a bit different in mentality than the PKK.
 
this is a lie. prove it or retract it. iran has zero troops in Iraq.

Oh right I forgot IRGC guys are not technically "Troops" only Artesh are "troops". lol no Qassem was just on vacation in Iran with his boys. lol
 
Netanyahu:

We want to build relations with the new regime in Syria, and the red line is to supply weapons to Hezbollah.

Netanyahu in a remarkable statement:

We want healthy relations with the new regime in Syria, but if this regime allows Iran to be present in Syria and transfer weapons, this regime will pay a heavy price.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Why are they so obsessed with PKK? Are they ideologically brothers? Sure I've seen photos of YPG with Oçalan's photo, but they also seem a bit different in mentality than the PKK.

No habibi, they are PKK, its the Syrian branch of the PKK, they answer to Qandil, don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

you let that cancer fester when it sees an opportunity is will launch an insurgency into Turkey trying to destroy Turkey's territorial integrity.

The joke is that the US recognizes the PKK as a terrorist group if the guy/operative is in Turkey, the moment he steps south of the border, the US will be like what PKK?

edit:
same group, different Branch.





 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Oh right I forgot IRGC guys are not technically "Troops" only Artesh are "troops". lol no Qassem was just on vacation in Iran with his boys. lol
Soleimani was travelling through Iraq. He was not a soldier stationed in Iraq, like the 20,000 Turkish terrorists permanently and illegally occupying Syrian land.

"Estimates suggest that there are a few hundred Iranian military personnel, primarily advisors and members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), present in Iraq."

"Estimates of the number of Turkish troops in Syria vary, but sources indicate that Turkey maintains between 10,000 and 20,000 military personnel across its operations in these regions"

so a "few hundred" Iranians in Iraq (legally) vs 10,000-20,000 Turkish terrorists in Syria (illegally).

your claim:

"Turkey has less troops in Syria than Iran has in Iraq currently"

DEBUNKED. Liar.
 
Yes, your EEZ map is BS, its not a fair division. sorry. lol
The map's according to UNCLOS and legit sources,your problem Turkey doesn't like it. But like an Egyptian here said: "You don't like it? Next time win the World War".
 
Turkey has a right to defend it.
Who is 'it'? If Syria, on what basis? What is the difference between Israel and Turkey 'defending' their interests by stepping into another country? Shouldn't Israel's bad acts be first repulsed by Syria in UNSC if it is not militarily capable? At least before inviting Turkey to help. BTW, I don't believe Turkey will oblige. They are smarter than that.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
No habibi, they are PKK, its the Syrian branch of the PKK, they answer to Qandil, don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

you let that cancer fester when it sees an opportunity is will launch an insurgency into Turkey trying to destroy Turkey's territorial integrity.
They'll eventually get American protection. The Israelis want them.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
That is why whole middle east needs nukes, ruthless, double faced opponent with cynical claimed moral superiority with endless resources and current domination can not be differently challenged.
Fair game and mutual respect facade fell of with impunity they gave to the jews for commiting live genocide and humiliation rest of the world.
That or continue to be inferior until you are not which is always vague option with uncertain outcome.
That is why muslim world is stupid as shit not able to agree on bailing out Pakistan in case of providing nuclear umbrella this one is most drastic measure but principle is pretty obvious.

It is safe to say that the US-Israel alliance has a genocidal hatred for all Muslims, and they would do to ALL Muslims what they've done to Gaza. They were equal partners in the genocide, and it is naive to think that only the Israelis are like that or they're only going to kill Palestinians. Every single of 2 billion Muslims on earth is on their kill list.

Therefore, if Muslims want to survive, they should be building nuclear weapons and ICBMs. The only way to survive is to achieve mutually assured destruction (MAD) capability.

At least 5-7 Muslims countries need to have nuclear weapons ready to fire.
 
A military convoy of the Turkish army enters the Aleppo countryside.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top