Russia, Iran, And India Are Creating A Third Pole Of Influence In International Relations

ST1976

Banned
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
3,311
Reaction score
436
Reputation
271.9
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

Russia, Iran, And India Are Creating A Third Pole Of Influence In International Relations :coffee:



1734070758372.png


The success of this project will help the world make progress in moving past the present bi-multipolar intermediary phase of the global systemic transition and correspondingly create more opportunities for other countries to strengthen their strategic autonomy in the New Cold War. :coffee:

Russian Transportation Minister Valery Savelyev just recognized the vital role that Iran plays for his country’s logistics nowadays through the North-South Transport Corridor (NSTC). According to him, the US-led West’s unprecedented sanctions that were imposed in response to Russia’s ongoing special military operation in Ukraine “have practically broken all the logistics in our country. And we are forced to look for new logistics corridors.” The primary one that his country is prioritizing is the NSTC through Iran, pointing out that three Caspian Sea ports already serve as trade conduits with the Islamic Republic while also acknowledging that there’s still a lot of work to be done on overland connectivity.

It was already predicted shortly after the onset of Russia’s special operation that Iran would become so much more important to Russia. This is because the NSTC functions as a trans-civilizational integration corridor connecting Russia’s historically Christian civilization, Iran’s Islamic one, and India’s Hindu civilization, not to mention the others such as those in Africa and Southeast Asia that can indirectly be linked to Russia via that route. It’s an irreplaceable valve from the US-led West’s economic and financial pressure that’s created such logistical difficulties for Russia in recent months, especially since it connects to India, which has defied Western pressure by continuing to practice its policy of principled neutrality. :coffee:

Without Iran’s leading participation in the NSTC, Russia would be cut off from its indispensable Indian partners whose decisive intervention preemptively averted its potentially disproportionate dependence on China in the future. This outcome in turn helped the world make progress in moving past the present bi-multipolar intermediary phase of the global systemic transition to multipolarity that’s seen International Relations largely shaped by the competition between the American and Chinese superpowers. It’s now becoming increasingly possible to speak of a third pole of influence represented by the grand strategic convergence between Russia, Iran, and India. :coffee:

It’s not officially acknowledged by their diplomats in order to avoid the American and/or Chinese superpowers misunderstanding their civilization-states’ intentions, but all three are informally trying to assemble a new Non-Aligned Movement (“Neo-NAM”). They hope to serve as equal centers of gravity within the third pole of influence that they hope to create for moving International Relations past its present bi-multipolar intermediary phase and towards a system of “tripolarity” that they expect to inevitably facilitate the emergence of complex multipolarity. The purpose behind doing so is to maximize their respective strategic autonomy within the New Cold War vis a vis the two superpowers. :coffee:

The international implications of their plan succeeding would literally be game-changing, which explains why efforts are actively underway to stop them. These have taken the form of the Associated Press leading the US-led Western Mainstream Media’s (MSM) infowar campaign against the Russian-Iranian Strategic Partnership while other outlets are waging a complementary one against the Russian-Indian Strategic Partnership. Both have failed since their leaderships are inspired by their shared multipolar conservative-sovereigntist (MCS) worldview to stay the course despite considerable pressure after their strategists presumably assured them that it’ll all be worth it in the end as long as they remain patient.

This stands in contrast to their Pakistani neighbor, which compellingly appears to be in the process of recalibrating its grand strategy and associated envisioned role in the global systemic transition following its scandalous change in government. The mixed signals that its new authorities have sent towards Russia in parallel with their enthusiastic outreach towards the US very strongly suggest that the MCS worldview previously embraced by former Prime Minister Khan is being gradually replaced to an uncertain extent by the Western-friendly unipolar liberal-globalist (ULG) one. This complicates multipolar processes in South Asia and risks isolating Pakistan from them in the worst-case scenario.

Nevertheless, Pakistan doesn’t have any intention of interfering with the NSTC even if it were to enter into a full-fledged and extremely rapid rapprochement with the US. This observation means that the grand strategic convergence between Russia, Iran, and India will continue, with those last two becoming even more important to Moscow than ever as valves from Western pressure and reliable alternatives to preemptively avert any potentially disproportionate dependence on China. Pakistan was supposed to play a complementary role in Russia’s Greater Eurasian Partnership (GEP) by also serving to balance Moscow’s growing reliance on Tehran and New Delhi, but this appears unlikely in light of recent events. :coffee:

With relations practically frozen on the energy front that was envisioned as laying the basis of their hoped-for strategic partnership, there’s little chance that Russia will ever consider Pakistan to be more important to its “Ummah Pivot” than Iran is quickly becoming unless these issues are urgently resolved. In all likelihood, they probably won’t be, and this dismal prediction is due to the educated conjecture that Pakistan’s new authorities consider slowing the pace of their rapprochement with Russia to be an “acceptable unilateral concession” in exchange for continuing talks on improving ties with the US, which is their new foreign policy priority.

Even though baby steps were recently seen in restoring their relations, new Foreign Minister Bhutto’s interview with the Associated Press during his inaugural trip to America to attend a UN event and meet one-on-one with Blinken cast doubt upon Islamabad’s interest in resuming energy talks with Russia. According to the outlet, he revealed that “his focus in talks with Blinken was on increasing trade, particularly in agriculture, information technology and energy.” This suggests that America is trying to “poach” Russia’s reported deal with Pakistan for providing it with food and fuel at a 30% discount, perhaps even offering less of a discount – if any at all – as a “necessary cost” for improving ties.

The predictable outcome of Pakistan deciding not to resume energy talks with Russia is that Iran and India’s importance for Russian grand strategy will continue growing without being kept in check by the Pakistani balancing factor that Moscow had previously taken for granted. That won’t be a problem unless they politicize their role as valves from Western pressure, which they’re reluctant to do anyhow since that would risk undermining their shared MCS interests in the global systemic transition through the Neo-NAM. Nevertheless, it’s still important to point out that the practical removal of Pakistan’s balancing influence in this paradigm increases Russia’s dependence on Iran and India.

With or without Russian-Pakistani relations becoming strategic like Moscow hoped would happen and consequently helping to balance its envisioned Neo-NAM, there’s little doubt that the axis that Russia is assembling with Iran and India will continue strengthening as these three jointly pursue the creation of a third pole of influence in International Relations. The success of this project will help the world make progress in moving past the present bi-multipolar intermediary phase of the global systemic transition and correspondingly create more opportunities for other countries to strengthen their strategic autonomy in the New Cold War. :coffee:

 
Last edited:
@Guru Dutt
@vasanthm
@vsdoc

how you people measure the article of this thread, which discuss the issues like "the New Cold War", "a third pole", "a new Non-Aligned Movement (“Neo-NAM”) :coffee:
 
Last edited:
we also running a thread about article :coffee:

Does India risk US sanctions over Iran’s Chabahar Port deal?​


here we have report, the US is 'risking' that India may even shoot down USA, if needed, but India will not compromise its strategic interests with Chabahar Port :)
 
Last edited:
here its worth stating: -

we find India-Russia-Iran combined power increased consistently since 1990. India-Russia combined are "self-sufficient" with themselves for a wide range of Industries since Cold War time.

Delhi-Moscow-Tehran dont have to trade with US-NATO...... :coffee:
 
That is right in the American face. So much effort put into transforming India into a US stooge. Yet India chooses its own path.

I was wrong. India has an independent policy. India doesn't apply non-alignment policy. India picks and chooses as per its interest.
 
Last edited:
we also running a thread about article :coffee:

Does India risk US sanctions over Iran’s Chabahar Port deal?​


here we have report, the US is 'risking' that India may even shoot down USA, if needed, but India will not compromise its strategic interests with Chabahar Port :)
The only difference between Chabahar and Gwadar is that a dime has not been spent on Chabahar
 
lol.......Achha? India is with Iran now?

How dis possible bro? :p

Are you sure?

India is with Iran & Russia since Cold War, as discussed in article of this thread also....

For example of Chabahar port, it's something, similarly China is with you in Gwather port. It will take a generations to change strategic difference between Chabahar and Gwadar ports. Similar to India -Russia-Iran relationship, Pakistan too is related to China for generations, ie Gwadar port 🙂

It has been confirmed to me that India may even "shoot down" US, if needed, but India will not compromise it's strategic interest with Chabahar port 😃
(It was in response to US's sanctions threat on India's 'go ahead' on Chabahar port development......)
 
Last edited:
India is with Iran & Russia since Cold War, as discussed in article of this thread also....

For example of Chabahar port, it's something, similarly China is with you in Gwather port. It will take a generations to change strategic difference between Chabahar and Gwadar ports. Similar to India -Russia-Iran relationship, Pakistan too is related to China for generations, ie Gwadar port 🙂

It has been confirmed to me that India may even "shoot down" US, if needed, but India will not compromise it's strategic interest with Chabahar port 😃
(It was in response to US's sanctions threat on India's 'go ahead' on Chabahar port development......)

It’s not entirely accurate, and I disagree to some extent.

The issue between the USA and India primarily revolves around trust, in my opinion. India does not rely heavily on the USA for defense or strategic matters; instead, it shares a longstanding and trusted friendship with Russia, built over decades of cooperation and partnership.

That said, India and the USA do need each other, albeit in different ways. In South Asia, India faces significant challenges with China and will never accept Chinese domination in the region. This shared interest aligns India and the USA, particularly in maritime security. India’s strategic focus on strengthening its navy complements the USA’s interest in selling advanced weapons and technology to the Indian Navy.

From an economic perspective, India also values its relationship with the USA and the West. For this reason, India is unlikely to sever ties with the USA.

Ultimately, India seeks to balance its relationships between the East and the West, prioritizing its own interests. India will not align with any single bloc unless circumstances force its hand. For instance, if China escalates aggression and a critical conflict appears inevitable, India may consider aligning with a specific camp.

India’s policy remains clear: it will always act in a manner that best serves its national interests.
 
Oh naythunn bhaappu, this is what Chahbahar port looks like right now. And according to you, no money has been spent on it?

Lets have bhang key TThhandaee..... aaajja buss tu.....its on me.

View attachment 88367

View attachment 88368


View attachment 88370
View attachment 88374

@vsdoc @Sharma Ji @Joe Shearer @Mrloveday @Justin TruDont @AjayGhatak @Guru Dutt
A mere 50 odd miles or something from your Gwadar too.

Hadn't been keeping up with news about it. That's looking pretty good, nice work by 🇮🇳 and 🇮🇷.
 
A mere 50 odd miles or something from your Gwadar too.

Hadn't been keeping up with news about it. That's looking pretty good, nice work by 🇮🇳 and 🇮🇷.
It looks fukkin world class n more importantly busy and highly developed bhai. Amazing no? Which also alludes to the suspicion that Iran n India are covertly doing far more trade than being advertised no?

Very sneaky........
 
It looks fukkin world class n more importantly busy and highly developed bhai. Amazing no? Which also alludes to the suspicion that Iran n India are covertly doing far more trade than being advertised no?

Very sneaky........
India are good with diplomacy.

Iran and Ijrael. USA and Russia. Have been that way with Ijrael and Palensinians back in the day too when Arafat was around.

Cold war too, allied to but not full commie block, co-founders of the non aligned movement.

Played a pretty decent geopolitical role over the years, we good actors, basically.
 
It looks fukkin world class n more importantly busy and highly developed bhai. Amazing no? Which also alludes to the suspicion that Iran n India are covertly doing far more trade than being advertised no? 😃

Very sneaky........

West - US cry foul about India - Iran relationship. India might be doing every trade and politics with Iran -Russia. India has every right to be with it's strategic friends.....

Internet is interfered by Western countries. They hide numbers, and manipulate them 🙂
I have news that India has put even nukes in Iran with credible ways to operate it. It was done while giving full information to US🙂
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top