ResurgentIran2
Registered Member
Ive had some time to think about this, now that the dust is settling from the collapse of Assad regime.
First of all, the fall of Syria is definitely a strategic setback for Iran and a net gain for the Zionist entity.
BUT Im beginning to think that the long term consequences for the resistance are greatly exaggerated. First of all, we have absolutely no clue what is going to be born out of the Syrian situation. The zionist entity spared NO time in moving in on Syrian lands to occupy and shot Syrian protestors. Such overreach is self defeating, and breathes life into resistance, and Iran may find new partnership in Syria. If not with official government, with groups in Syria with which it finds common interests, to fight against Zionist aggression.
Furthermore t is becoming abundantly clear that Syria under Assad was steering away from Iran and the axis anyway, during later years, in favor of more ties with GCC governments.
Second of all, Iran can still clever ways to rearm Hezbollah. Hezbollah is self sufficient in the production of certain arms and munitions.
Even for the more heavier stuff, it will find its way to Lebanon, just like it found its way to Yemen, which has no land bridge with Iran and is thousands of kilometers away.
Im not going to sugarcoat things. What happened in Syria was indeed a setback, and it would be dumb to pretend otherwise.
But Im beginning to realise it was not the doom and gloom, that is being purported in Western media, which is essentially completely aligned with Western governments to wage a psychological war.
The Houthis just launched a missile that Israeli and American systems completely failed to intercept. And now there are reports of American navy pilots ejecting, supposedly out of "friendly fire" (what a joke), whereas I believe it was all done by the Yemenis.
