Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
- Thread starter
- #1,276
IRGC-GF reveal guided version of Falagh-2 rocket
Range - 11 km
warhead - 110 kg
CEP <25 metres
Range - 11 km
warhead - 110 kg
CEP <25 metres
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
100,000 ballistic missiles is a very high number. Estimated cost of a medium size ballistic missiles is around 10m to 20m, depending how advanced it is. Now adding up the cost seems unrealistic, testing missiles, training, materials, facilities, maintenance cost millions. Having 10,000 missiles would be great achievement.A 104! Now let's be nice and assume that they have an even number of 1000 missiles per bas, and that just the missile cities. I'm not mad for assuming that Iran probably has missiles in the 100 000 numbers. I've previously stated this. I truly believe that Iran is actually crazy enough to have gone totally James Bond villain mode and stockpiled an insane amount of missiles, enough missiles to go to war with the entire zionist occupied West!
The missiles with chemical and biological weapons are the most deadly, in a war those will be saved till last or they will be the first ones to be targeted by invaders.in Operation TP 1 and 2 we fired a combined total of 300+ ballistic missiles
destroyed maybe 2-5 buildings/hangars
certainly not "sheer devastation". now if they can improve the accuracy or decide to target population centres rather than massive and sparse air bases, that's a different story
I personally believe that Iran makes them cheaper than your figures. My estimate is around 10% of yours, 100 to 200 000. This would require around 20 billions over approximately 30 years using the higher estimate. That's an allocation of a little over a billion a year. A reasonable amount considering.100,000 ballistic missiles is a very high number. Estimated cost of a medium size ballistic missiles is around 10m to 20m, depending how advanced it is. Now adding up the cost seems unrealistic, testing missiles, training, materials, facilities, maintenance cost millions. Having 10,000 missiles would be great achievement.
History has shown that Iran has never used chemical or biological weapons despite being invaded and being the victim of such atrocities.The missiles with chemical and biological weapons are the most deadly, in a war those will be saved till last or they will be the first ones to be targeted by invaders.
What are we looking at? Combination of a silo and a missile farm?Launch from the ground
View attachment 102594
It is not feasible to possess 100,000 missiles in any way or shape or form for Iran or for any superpower in the world. The way you assumed one missile city would have 1000 missiles tells me all I need to know about how wrong you are. Come on bro you are riding the wave of fantasy.A 104! Now let's be nice and assume that they have an even number of 1000 missiles per bas, and that just the missile cities. I'm not mad for assuming that Iran probably has missiles in the 100 000 numbers. I've previously stated this. I truly believe that Iran is actually crazy enough to have gone totally James Bond villain mode and stockpiled an insane amount of missiles, enough missiles to go to war with the entire zionist occupied West!
1000 missiles per base is too high100,000 ballistic missiles is a very high number. Estimated cost of a medium size ballistic missiles is around 10m to 20m, depending how advanced it is. Now adding up the cost seems unrealistic, testing missiles, training, materials, facilities, maintenance cost millions. Having 10,000 missiles would be great achievement.
So you believe your assumption is correct and mine is wrong? You do understand that all of us here are more or less doing guesswork from relatively available and open information, yes? Some assumptions are more qualified than others but still assumptions. It's therefore neither logical nor rational of you to believe your assumptions to be more correct than others.It is not feasible to possess 100,000 missiles in any way or shape or form for Iran or for any superpower in the world. The way you assumed one missile city would have 1000 missiles tells me all I need to know about how wrong you are. Come on bro you are riding the wave of fantasy.
I read somewhere that the cost was around 200 000 USD per missile. Don't remember which missile though. But you're right in that the newer missiles will obviously cost more. I'll see if I can find the source.1000 missiles per base is too high
but $10-20m per missile is also much too high. the cost is for sure < $1m per missile (maybe Khorramshahr and Fattah-2 are higher only due to size and advanced materials)
I would estimateI read somewhere that the cost was around 200 000 USD per missile. Don't remember which missile though. But you're right in that the newer missiles will obviously cost more. I'll see if I can find the source.
According to Hajizadeh, the production of each Fattah hypersonic missile costs 200 thousand dollars for Iran.I read somewhere that the cost was around 200 000 USD per missile. Don't remember which missile though. But you're right in that the newer missiles will obviously cost more. I'll see if I can find the source.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.