Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
r3alist said:
Why you say like this

Ultimately, he is the best voice to speak on what he does

Gold is where you find it
Click to expand...
US and Israel skeptic/nay sayer hai in very much the same vein as everyone's favorite pjeit analyst, Pravin Sawhney.
 
Using historical information and current advancements in the Indian Military - simulations suggest that India would carry out some form of limited engagement near Sialkot
1746277803058.png
1746277991106.png
In both models Pakistan maintains the advantage when it comes to battlefield initiative. Which would force India to utilize stand-off weapons as a force multiplier with a view that Pakistan would not climb the escalation ladder.

This model takes into account Indian's progress towards and agile ITC (unified theatre command) which itself has been plagued with problems:
www.security-risks.com

Theaterisation: Keep the IAF Out

With General Anil Chauhan having taken over the mantle of the Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS) jointness and higher defence reorganization has come to the fore. Amongst others, initiatives undertaken by late General Bipin Rawat proposing theatre commands should be taken to the logical conclusion...
www.security-risks.com www.security-risks.com

India's Unified Command consists of there areas of focus:

  1. The first ITC focuses on improving security and operational efficiency along the Pakistan frontier, headquartered in Jaipur, Rajasthan.
  2. The second is tasked with strengthening defence postures along the Chinese border, with its base in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.
  3. The third[not covered in this model], a maritime ITC based in Thiruvananthapuram, aims to secure India’s maritime interests.

Alongside intelligence and weapon advancements, Pakistan has already invested in extensive scenario planning and wargaming to anticipate potential conflicts under this new strategic environment and prepare effective strategies for deterrence and de-escalation.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


This is a welcome move and should take into account the impact of Indian theaterization.

Finally, an essential part of Pakistan’s response to India’s military advancements is proactive international diplomacy.

Building partnerships and engaging with regional and global powers is important to ensure that Pakistan’s concerns are understood and considered by the international community. This diplomatic engagement is vital to mitigating the inherent escalation risks associated with advanced military capabilities that shorten decision making time frames.

southasianvoices.org

Institutionalizing Nuclear Confidence Building Measures between India and Pakistan – South Asian Voices

This article delves into the need for India and Pakistan to formalize Nuclear CBMs to foster stability and reduce mistrust in the region.
southasianvoices.org southasianvoices.org

Robust diplomatic initiatives and proactive international engagement are critical for de-escalating tensions and building regional consensus on stability. These efforts directly mitigate the risks associated with India’s military restructuring and promoting a balanced, stable security environment in South Asia.
 
Fellows what do you think - has there been an engagement between PAF and IAF?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
mulj said:
One thing about so called corruption, first step for containing is that to recognize it as fundamental part of human nature and that you will never be able to defeat it.
What you can do it is to contain it in acceptable margins by implementing administrative controlled instruments on low/mid levels of society, digital era that we live in provided rather efficient tools for that, rest is up to political will.
Click to expand...

Good post.
I have been saying on PDF for MANY Years: Pakistan is not particularly more corrupt or inefficient when compared with most poor countries, including the countries of the Subcontinent. But unfortunately, Pakistanis were led to believe by the Pakistani Establishment itself that some pious, incorruptible person would be like a magic wand to solve Pakistan's problems, including of corruption. While 'containing' Corruption to acceptable level would be good but a country has to be run with overall political 'wisdom' and the fundamental aspect of that is collective decision making, political accommodations, and continuity of policies. And to be a 'wise' leader would require a flexible personality who would not be driven by an insurmountable rigidity and ego. I am sure Pakistanis here know what I am saying in between words but without getting too explicit about it.
 
ARMalik said:
Fellows what do you think - has there been an engagement between PAF and IAF?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


No sign of direct action or any military jet losses as of now. Just a "ping" type lock on, nothing else.
 
Sharma Ji said:
US and Israel skeptic/nay sayer hai in very much the same vein as everyone's favorite pjeit analyst, Pravin Sawhney.
Click to expand...


You are becoming mullah😂

Really if you are serious in your view you will advise on India.... Not here

Pravin is pro India, he is over hyping Pakistan

Pakistani just grateful someone who is not war monger


All kids psychologically both sides..... please be nice to me..... pleassssse



Btw Pravin.... is he totally wrong?

If he is 80% right yousss are screwed on pk alone, forget china 😂😂
 
Ali_Baba said:
No sign of direct action or any military jet losses as of now. Just a "ping" type lock on, nothing else.
Click to expand...

Americans have not been asked to leave India or even a general travel advisory yet. No mass mobilization of Indian troops either. We can't rule out tit for tat here and there and even some arranged face-saving for India.
As @HAIDER said just above: This is basically about India stealing the Pakistani water and Pakistan needs to start working against that.
 
Yasser76 said:
I imagine the Rafale pilots will be wanting to even the score with us at some point
Click to expand...

They may want to, and they may get a lucky shot and take down a jet, but that jet would also be shot down straight away alongside others in the formation. The density of the IADS means that there are multiple 'kill shots' available from multiple sources on a given target at any time now. Things have changed a lot since 2019.
 
Ali_Baba said:
They may want to, and they may get a lucky shot and take down a jet, but that jet would also be shot down straight away alongside others in the formation. The density of the IADS means that there are multiple 'kill shots' available from multiple sources on a given target at any time now. Things have changed a lot since 2019.
Click to expand...

I am hoping we have some J-10C/JF-17 pilots who trained against Qatari Rafales ready, pretty sure they would have practiced ambushing each other.

Loss of a Rafale or two would be a PR disaster not just for IAF, but Modi and France
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 16 (members: 0, guests: 16)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top