Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Musings @RescueRanger


In the time of war any person from our side posts or criticize our own armed forces or leaders it should be consider yellow " Ghaddar" and banned for life.

I hope admins are vigilant about this issue we need to eradicate yellows from our soil. period.

I completely agree 100%. Anyone should be banned for life, who criticize the genuine leader of 250 million people - on whose name entire nation voted. If you love Pakistan, then you MUST RESPECT its GENUINE LEADER !

At the same time everyone of us must stand behind our troops. Nation has sacrificed its education, health and progress for one thing only that is investing on its military. Today is the time military is out of cantonments and do the job they were trained and paid to do all their lives. and the nation must stand shoulder to shoulder with it.

Bottomline is, You need to understand difference between nation's true genuine leadership versus a military officer who denied the nation from its true leadership and trampled the nation's constitution for his own illegal rule post-retirement. Patriots will ALWAYS understand this difference. Pakistan was built to achieve greatness. It was not built for few dictators who can ruin it for their own wish of continued naukri and illegal rule.
 
leave that for another thread, Pak had captured peaks and held the high ground advantage.. our veers did great.

it resulted in both a military as well as diplomatic defeat for Pak but they still hold 5353.

Nope, you lost thousands and thousands of men and have covered it up
 
Your assumption that Pakistan can destroy India’s nuclear installations implies that the Pakistani military is on par with India’s—which is simply foolish.

India’s advanced air defense systems, which provide an additional layer of security isn’t even necessary in the India-Pakistan context. In the event of a full-scale war, India would eliminate Pakistan’s nuclear installations before they could be used.

While air defense systems are designed to intercept nuclear missiles mid-air, that stage is unlikely to ever be reached. As I’ve said before, the chances of a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan are zero.

LOL! its repetition of the same rant without any logical or factual information. You are just passing out statements. Your statements has ZERO value without backing it with actual events OR reference events. I gave practical examples on the state of your air defense at india's highest ever AIR ALERT stage. How none of indian air defense could stop whole contingent of PAF package loaded with H-4 missiles. Nothing from indian air defense came at PAF aircrafts, or at their stand off munitions when you were at highest air alert. Mind you hitting fighter jets is far easier then striking down missiles. I even gave you examples from makers of S500s and the way their most defended places even got hit. I told you even the United States do not have any israeli like defense umbrella. But you foolishly is still believing a joke that india can somehow stop Pakistani projectiles ? Really where is your sanity ? Is it even exists ?

Reality is different from bollywood. Why you are mixing both up ?
 
, India would eliminate Pakistan’s nuclear installations before they could be used.

You are obviously quite young or just seriously not well researched. The entire might of the USAF along with allied NATO air forces could not stop Saddam's forces from launching SCUD missiles into neighbouring countries during Desert Storm. There were 46 fired into Saudi Arabia and 42 into Israel. The coalition manged to take out 100 eventually;


Read this;

A-10 strike aircraft flew over these zones during the day, and F-15E's fitted with LANTRIN pods and synthetic aperture radars patrolled at night. However, the infrared signatures and radar sigantures of the Iraqi TELSs were almost impossible to distinguish from ordinary trucks and from the surrounding electromagnetic clutter. During the war, while patrolling, strike aircraft managed to sight mobile TELs on 42 occasions, but only eight times the aircraft were able to locate the targets well enough to release their ordnance. In addition, the Iraqi missile units dispersed their Scud TELs and hid them in culverts, wadis , or under highway bridges. They also practiced "shoot and scoot" tactics, withdrawing the launcher to a hidden location immediately after it had fired, while the launch sequence that usually took 90 minutes was reduced to half an hour. This enabled them to preserve their forces, despite optimistic claims by the coalition. A post-war Pentagon study concluded that relatively few launchers had been destroyed by coalition aircraft



You're seriously deluded if you think your air force can take out even a section of Pakistan's strike capability. Aside hardened silos there are mobile sites, sea based strike etc.
 
Last edited:
The outcome of any India-Pakistan war will always mirror that of 1971—there is no other realistic possibility.
The only outcome will be that trolls and losers like you will still be crawling on our forums however definitely under a new fake ID .
Can you even comprehend how what you like to call a bankrupt Pakistan has squarely check mated India in every possible scenario.
Let your rabid Godi media win the war by making a complete idiot of Indians .
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top