Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

I don't know what you are trying to get at? If implying the role of the Pakistani military in the Pakistani society, then no dispute it is an outsized role. But unlike some, I don't see the Pakistani military fleecing the Pakistani society. The military comes from the lower/middle class of Pakistan and has the representation from several major ethnic groups of Pakistan and, as long as there is the grave threat from India, I have no problem given the military primacy to defend Pakistan and keeps some semblance of order in Pakistan's political system.
BTW, this whole anti military rhetoric started with the brainwashing just three years ago. Modi is not the only cult-leader in the Subcontinent.
Enough political discussion except I will say one more thing: The anarchist party is going to have to wait for its turn until at least the 2029 elections in Pakistan IF it behaves. That's my understanding of the current political environment in Pakistan.
Sir, the bit you quoted was just the AI recommendation for a follow-up question, I neglected to delete it, no offense intended 😂

I was just sharing the possibilities and previous success stories of a military Foundation to industry
 
i am sure you are okay allowing stealing from you by some gun wielding badmash just like you are okay with your mouaziz mafia stealing from people their votes and resources!
you forgot to add; that while residing in the US and most likely participating in the process of casting a ballot! Hypocritically supporting the right of taking away peoples right to cast a ballot from the people of Pakistan. Supporting a brutal junta, supporting all aspects of false detention. to summarise a few things that person supports.
 
It is already a brutal 'hybrid' system and I actually welcome that! And may it persist for the next 15-20 years. And the system has brilliantly given political bones to all major political parties to form a true 'hybrid' system.
BTW, the Pakistan military comes from Pakistan's lower and middle classes and represents a significant part of the Pakistan's major ethnic groups. It is NOT an alien army and is the first, the last and the only line of defense which Pakistan has. The perks of the higher ranking Generals are regrettable but they don't take away the professionalism, the efficiency, the patriotism, and indeed the cohesive bond the Pakistani military provides.
Pakistan Zindabad and Pakistan Army Zindabad!
Even the perks and charges of corruption are a myth, I know of 4 high ranking Military officers in my near or far acquittances and I can personally vouch for them:
  • One of them, a senior air force officer, did not speak to his wife for a week, after she asked him to vouch for their son's admissions at a University.
  • Another one has never even used the parking vouchers that are given to him as a perk, let alone any other perks, as he thinks he did not serve the country to get perks
  • Yet another one who also served at higher levels got one plot for his service and he donated it for a mosque, the guy drives a 30 year old car that hardly functions. He got shot with 8 bullets in a counter terrorism operation that he was heading, 10 years ago.
  • Another one who is a military doctor performs several surgeries a year, for free, for deserving people, even though he is one of the most experienced medical professional in the army.
And they are all from upper brass of the current establishment (ore recently retired form current brass), not some lower ranking soldiers. These people sacrifice their lives for the country and every country's military gets perks. Our people just love to shout at everyone and anyone for their own failures. Every institute, culture, workplace has bad people, but I have seen regular people being far more corrupt in my life, than any of these army officers that I know of.
 
Last edited:
In China, the leader is elected from a pool of the brightest and best that the communist party can generate. Who will elect the leadership in Pakistan, what is the evolutionary framework to ensure that for a given system, the brightest, smartest and best rise to the top and can take on the challenge of leadership? Yes - China is not a democracy, but each leader has to prove their worth, and there is a very large talent pool. It is not like Pakistan where the pool is the "family and uncle network".
Yes, China is indeed a centralized country. All the power in China is concentrated at the top.

But, it is very difficult to reach the pinnacle of power in China. In comparison, it is much easier to become the president of the United States (as long as you have enough money, you can easily ascend to the throne of the president of the United States).

The highest authority in China is nominally the National People's Congress (NPC), but the actual highest authority is the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (PSC). That is, a group of 7 people. The top leader is only the public face of the group.

To join this group, you must have strong enough abilities and rich enough political experience...... these two alone are difficult enough.

At the same time, there is an invisible rule in traditional Chinese political philosophy: the top leader must be decisive and ruthless. This is the most difficult point.

The greater the power, the greater the responsibility and the higher the demands.
 
Save this tweet everyone.. :ROFLMAO:1747576587907.png

1747577172037.png
Recalling the India–EU Summit joint declaration on International Terrorism, both sides condemned in the strongest terms all terrorist activities and reaffirmed their strong commitment to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including its financing, the dismantling of terrorist infrastructures and countering radicalization, to ensure that Afghanistan is never again a safe haven for international terrorism.

External Affairs Minister Dr. Jaishankar and HRVP Borrell expect that the political process will lead to an Afghanistan that, as a signatory of the UN Charter, upholds and promotes the values, fundamental rights and principles enshrined therein, and does not constitute a threat to international peace and security. They will not support the restoration of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, as stated in UNSC Resolution 2513.

:ROFLMAO:
 
Were you dropped on your head when you was child? Your English is riddled with errors and mistakes so I can't understand what bullshit you're peddling half the time, but let me get this right, you're using "covariance" in this context to mean there's no independent satellite images?! Wtf?! Are you for real?! Do you even know what covariance even means? Were you educated in a madrasa or something!
listen, smart dumb shit...
first learn to argue without bias, I am open to argument, without any profanity, you seem to have divine right to blow any one with 'bullshit'!
and dont feel any pride about your english, you are still brown second rate 'immigrant' who has made locals stranger. Dont think you hold some brown right to abuse anyone (shows how shameless you really are!)

last time (though reluctantly) what is your argument ( I will not answer, if there is any profanity)?
dont even talk about covariance, you were confusing causation with independence, hence argument of covariance was presented.
 
We all know he has a soft spot for them. It was his weakness.

He wanted to be loved more than feared and for a country like Pakistan it can be fatal.
But who gave them a rise, watered the plant into a tree and then turned on them during the war of terror years? They turned against the people that nurtured them! Both turned against each other.

His stance is instead of demolishing the old FATA, find a non kinetic way of dealing with them. Like the US had to do with the afghan Talib. They negotiated with them and left Afghanistan. Today they are reopening the embassy in Kabul completely bypassing GHQ. looking back now the war of terror will take a century to recover from. Khan was against that war of terror, while many were pro war of terror. Today people of KP are pro band master or anti? hard question to answer!
 
No one has seen r ceasefire agreement!! That's the point I'm making that doesn't seem to be getting through your thick skull!! You're the one here peddling bullshit about not showing satellite pics because of some mythical ceasefire agreement, just like the bakht media in India.
whats the point you are trying to make?!!! you are the piffle peddler here!!!

Its getting harder with each post you make, to determine the lengths of your stupidity!
 
Save this tweet everyone.. :ROFLMAO:View attachment 121871

View attachment 121875
Recalling the India–EU Summit joint declaration on International Terrorism, both sides condemned in the strongest terms all terrorist activities and reaffirmed their strong commitment to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including its financing, the dismantling of terrorist infrastructures and countering radicalization, to ensure that Afghanistan is never again a safe haven for international terrorism.

External Affairs Minister Dr. Jaishankar and HRVP Borrell expect that the political process will lead to an Afghanistan that, as a signatory of the UN Charter, upholds and promotes the values, fundamental rights and principles enshrined therein, and does not constitute a threat to international peace and security. They will not support the restoration of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, as stated in UNSC Resolution 2513.

:ROFLMAO:
I wish I could feel sad for India, but I cannot. Good job to them, keep kicking yourself in the faces :ROFLMAO:
 
It is already a brutal 'hybrid' system and I actually welcome that! And may it persist for the next 15-20 years. And the system has brilliantly given political bones to all major political parties to form a true 'hybrid' system.
Lol.

Its always the one's who are living in the comforts of the west that tell us what is good for people living in Pakistan. Living conditions mimic sub saharan african levels outside of Central and Northern Punjab. Abhi tk chooran hi bech rahay ho?
 
No one has seen r ceasefire agreement!! That's the point I'm making that doesn't seem to be getting through your thick skull!! You're the one here peddling bullshit about not showing satellite pics because of some mythical ceasefire agreement, just like the bakht media in India.
your causation point was blown away with zero cov (with just 5 to 6 words!), which world do you live in?!!!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top