Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[Vkdindian1]

Conversely it could be argued that there was significant damage to indian military bases by Pakistani missiles but neither the Pakistani military nor the indian government want these to be revealed as it would cause an outrage in india for a full scale war with Pakistan

Really? Is this your assessment?

Haath haula rakho bhai, kuch to reham karo?

 

[Khanivore]

They do. It is called CH-AS-X-13. Its Chinese answer to US carriers. It ALBM + Hypersonic glide warhead.

The only issue? You will need H-20 Bomber to use it... That is if China is willing to tranfer a missile with range more than 300 KM to you.

Try harder. DF-17 could well be in Pakistan's inventory very soon. Don't take my word for it tho.

 

[Vox Non Dei]

Try harder. DF-17 could well be in Pakistan's inventory very soon. Don't take my word for it tho.

Let it arrive and we will talk about it. Less likely because DF-17 has much longer range than 300 KM.

 

[Khanivore]

Let it arrive and we will talk about it. Less likely because DF-17 has much longer range than 300 KM.

And Ukraine is an exception in your eyes because the EU/NATO can do whatever they like? Let China decide if the 300km rule still stands.

 

[StormBreaker]

Surely Pakistan can manufacture drones like Shahed 136 with at least 1000+ km range if not 2500 km range.

We must also invest in stealth UCAVs in good numbers, possibly using turbojets for SEAD/DEAD missions.

PN, PAF and even PA could benefit a lot by them. And we need to raise huge fleets of the current UCAVs/UAVs too.

 

[gamaji]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Khanivore]

We must also invest stealth UCAVs in good numbers, possibly using turbojets for SEAD/DEAD missions.

PN, PAF and even PA could benefit a lot by them. And we need to raise huge fleets of the current UCAVs/UAVs too.

That's the way forward.

 

[StormBreaker]

That's the way forward.

They are cheap force multipliers. We could use them very effectively at low altitudes and their small sizes could possibly help them escape AA guns. The UAV fleet would need some EW capable UAVs too, to command the UAV attack packages. The combined attack package might be costly but it has better chances at effective DEAD ops

 

[Khanivore]

They are cheap force multipliers. We could use them very effectively at low altitudes and their small sizes could possibly help them escape AA guns. The UAV fleet would need some EW capable UAVs too, to command the UAV attack packages. The combined attack package might be costly but it has better chances at effective DEAD ops

Agreed. Cost-effective UAVs, especially in swarm configurations with possibly the aid of AI, offer significant tactical advantages for low-altitude penetration and SEAD/DEAD operations. Integrating EW-capable UAVs for command and coordination enhances survivability and mission success. This could align with the doctrine of leveraging asymmetric technologies to counter more conventional threats.

 

[Maarkhoor]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Abdul q]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Why do you keep posting this stupid chacha… most of what he says is just BS…. For analysis consumption quality is low as well

 

[Goenitz]

Here comes usual rant…. -_-‘ see a psychiatrist.. OCD patient

he is the same person who said any stage cancer patient would be cured in Pak soon using cryogenic method. Never heard him again

 

[gamaji]

Here comes usual rant…. -_-‘ see a psychiatrist.. OCD patient

You still need to tell what Dada claimed and that turned out to be wrong. Don't just keep saying bullsh!t. Give us the real evidence.

 

[gamaji]

Never heard him again

You have all the right to do that. Keeping doing that.

 

[gamaji]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies