OldTwilight
Registered Member
Senior Iranian official to Al Jazeera:
Dimona nuclear reactor could be a legitimate target if the war escalates
how much escalation we need?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Senior Iranian official to Al Jazeera:
Dimona nuclear reactor could be a legitimate target if the war escalates
Yes, Iran could have made better investments.I thought Iranian air defenses have stood back up after the 1st attack. But these zionists come and bomb whatever site they want at will. Only if Iran had a capable airforce it would have been a fair fight.
HMINT and SAT intelligenceBut USAF said during Gulf War 1991 they had a hard time locating Iraqi SCUD launchers. How can IDF planes fly just in time to destroy Iranian TELs about to launch missiles when their air bases are 1,300 kms away?
There aren’t enough ADs in the world to stop the US. It would be better to regain control over the airspace ASAP, rebuild all launchers and regain full offensive capability. If they want to deter the US, being a real threat to Israel works way better than trying to scare USAF with some ADsProbably trying to preserve our remaining AD in case of war with USA , which is stupid decision in first place ....
They are so obsessed with USA ...
I try to remain optimistic. Still, the pessimist in me says otherwise. And, why I keep saying that once we go down that slippery slope, all bets are off.Well If the US gets involved and this whole thing goes nuclear, then what would stop NorthKorea, China or Russia .....and even India/Pakistan from using nukes then?
Are we actively looking at the Armagaeddon where 99% of us will be gone?
Are we that close already?
Senior Iranian official to Al Jazeera:
Dimona nuclear reactor could be a legitimate target if the war escalates
Yes, Iran could have made better investments.
Perhaps they underestimated the Israelis?
More like a combined effort by Israel, US, Jordan, Iraq, etc....
What do they use to intercept drones? Can those be depleted over time?
I think he means strategically speaking. In a way he is right if that is what he means as far as taking out IDF bases and naval ports that we haven't seen much if any. Now Tel A Veev itself the damage is not minimal whole blocks have been destroyed and lets say he's not far off the percentage rate of interceptions since the beginning of conflict (i'll guess 75-80%) 70-90 missiles getting through especially with their accuracy and warhead yield is devastating for a city.What evidence do you have that damage to Israel has been minimal?
The problem is the US doesn't want to use its military power to reign in the Aggressor who started this - Israel.Well If the US gets involved and this whole thing goes nuclear, then what would stop NorthKorea, China or Russia .....and even India/Pakistan from using nukes then?
Are we actively looking at the Armagaeddon where 99% of us will be gone?
Are we that close already?
Are you talking about Iran? Or the US?The problem is highest level of infiltration up to highest level which compromised everything ... All of plan and tactic, the position of AD and our BM launchers were probably fell ot our enemy hand ...
IRGC leaders were more busy with CULTURAL and CEREMONIAL activities and big interview rather than military activity ...
All blame goes to Khamenei which lets guys under his direct control act some recklessly ...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.