Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
given the fact that our nation has not been prepared for the eventual war, the first strike by Pak is the only option left.Tankers are coming daily from nur khan to karachi coast for refuelling. Something is going to happen again. I believe we will strike first. Reason is simple. Confirmation from sources that XYZ formation carrying brahmos and scalp for ground attack. There will be some seconds to decide and approve that such formations should be targeted before they fire their cruise missiles.
PAF knows too much about IAF and how they operate. Some of our jets will engage targets and some will fire our own cruise missiles. We will see f-16 this time. I am 100% sure.
IAF wants something big in Sindh this time specially Karachi. Indian navy might be involved as well. These are no more operations against so called terrorists. This is about hurting Pakistan and dream of capturing Pakistani cities.
We have made assumptions that nuclear weapons are a deterrence. India is trying to find weakness from a series of such operations. They are trying to figure out our response on different scenerios. Such scenarios are important for final nuclear war.
Do you think the sovereign fund managers would allow Modi, Adani, Amabni etc. to go that far? The US policy IMO doesn't have any room for such a nuclear exchange in the subcontinent...We have made assumptions that nuclear weapons are a deterrence. India is trying to find weakness from a series of such operations. They are trying to figure out our response on different scenerios. Such scenarios are important for final nuclear war.
Does sitting on the top of train count as retarded? How about defecating at a beach in Canada.Really, I thought they were born retards.
Not specially a question of birds downed. PAF was unable to air support the pak troups on ground. It was the IAF goal.How many PAF planes were lost in Kargil vs IAF?
My pleasure my dear, my pleasure....Whoever you are , thanks for giving us something toabout
It is PAF vs IAF question. You said IAF was 10/10.Not specially a question of birds downed. PAF was unable to air support the pak troups on ground. It was the IAF goal.
OR ’IT IS DEFINITELY’ MOREYou didn't get the point.
It might not be 6-0 ...it might be less than that
Apologies for going a bit overboard—I'm not even remotely a military enthusiast; I will be more careful next time.Bird strikes are no joke.
They are very dangerous for ANY airframe so this tweet is utter ignorance.
The IAF pilot showed extreme presence of mind to do this because the Jaguar is already underpowered so he lightened the weight in to continue takeoff and land with damaged engine.
It was actually very skillful.
Unfortunately this is where jingoism and ignorance shows in people
The only metric that matters in a conflict is number of casualties (after sq km of territory captured which was itreleavnt in this conflict)
By PAFs own admission, 6 personnel including an officer were killed.
Whereas on the IAF Side only one nursing sergeant was killed.
That itself shows which side got more damage
You don't understand, it was a Jaguar car, the company is indian owned now, driven by a IAF pilot and another as passenger. Unfortunately both died in the car accident.
www.indianarrative.com
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.