So what do you expect to see? A fully intact SU30 from a shot down wreckage? Every wreckage is different, some can easily to identified and some leave behind small footprint. The evidence from Akhnoor wreckage all points to SU30 shot down. You guys are just in denial. Yes Su30 is a huge aircraft but dont forget that if an aircraft is shot down at high altitude, by the time it hits the ground the aircraft is severely burnt plus in su30 case it was shot down around 2am and the below video shows that the wreckage was still on fire in the morning. So not much will be left from 4 to 6 hours of burning wreckage.
The two metal beams sticking out from the wreckage belongs to Su30 frame structure. Not a drone tail boom. Also, note the landing gear wheels which is too large to belong to a drone.
And then lets not kid ourself, the entire village saw two pilots land with a parachutes and were taken away by military ambulance.
Not a testimony of one or two people but 50 plus.
And lets not forget, there was heavy presence of Indian police at the crash site indicating that something high value asset was being protected.
And oh, my personal favorite evidence is the presence of IAF SU30 pilot in orange uniform.
View attachment 137880
View attachment 137877
View attachment 137878
And as for satellite images. Indian military did not use their own satellites but the one that is available in public domain. Not all ammunition can be clearly seen via satellite imagery because TNT usage will matter the most. For example, India used cruise missile on a runway so since it uses high TNT the creator will be clearly visible. In Pakistan's case, the CM400 that was used to destory S400 radar carried lower TNT and most probably FRAGMENT BLAST warhead was used to achive high probability kill.