maverick
Trusted Member
thats tells u trump is bigger cartoon lolconsidering Pakistan is run by cartoons ... I would say a major achievement
even Afganistan managed a 15% rate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
thats tells u trump is bigger cartoon lolconsidering Pakistan is run by cartoons ... I would say a major achievement
even Afganistan managed a 15% rate.
Now not only India refused to fall in line, MEA’s quirky reply might also made him perplexed, MEA reply has hit him where it was mattered and press conference showed how misinformed he was.
Yeah !! He is providing excellent lighting inside adalia jail !we got a leader called Khan.. he showed us the light..
you guys are still on poop menu.
Likelihood - We will see mass exodus of these experts, very soon, till a new thread starts about imminent Indian downfall.
The question is - Why would he do that? What has changed so much and what would US gain?IF Trump decides to really punish India then the Indians are likely to suffer a lot.
The question is - Why would he do that? What has changed so much and what would US gain?
I wouldn’t go on to list them. They are well known and haven’t changed in the last few months or years.
My assessment - these are just pressure tactics for a trade deal.
India allowed the US to train Tibetans in India and sent them back into fight. The Tibetans lost and now operate their “government in exile” in India. So that is one example of an ongoing American op.India would never allow any military operations from its soil. This has been a policy decision since 1947 and isn’t likely to be changed. This is well known all across as well as Trump administration.
When did Trump make such a demand from India? These are wild theories being dished out for the purpose of sensationalism, nothing more.
Why did he impose tariff on Canada? It is a NATO ally after all.
And if, Pakistan was really some kind of star then why 19%? Why not zero?
Trump speaks first and then thinks. Even his administration is not able to catch up in this regard and has been fumbling, off late.
Few nations with whom US had trade surplus were also imposed with heavy tariffs, which were retracted later on realising the goof up.
Zelenskyy saga is another example of 360 degree turns by him in a short span of time.
It must be devastating for many here, on seeing India calling out US for maintaining trade with Russia while asking India to not do so.
And thats called spine.
He doesn’t have to keep it going forever, just as long as he can, preferably for as long as Trump is in office. When he loses his effectiveness, watch the other generals suddenly look for a democratic replacement.Munir is being made to be larger than what he is.
One lunch, Nobel preach prize nomination and he has been touted as a 4D chess player.
The very next day, the 4D appeared like 0 D when US attacked Iran.
Hoping and expecting a General to suddenly become a seasoned diplomat is asking for too much from him.
He was already a master military strategist, an economist par excellence and now a diplomat too?
Just think.
Relatively speaking, it’s better than what India has been able to do. India faces 25% plus additional penalties.19% tax is a master stroke for you guys ? Really !
India allowed the US to train Tibetans in India and sent them back into fight. The Tibetans lost and now operate their “government in exile” in India. So that is one example of an ongoing American op.
China will support India on this issue.India being as isolated as it is makes capitulation the most likely outcome... or simply resign out of world power politics.
But to me it does appear that Trump senses weakness in India
US is a superpower like no other and can do a lot. But there are enough examples of US retreating in the face of resistance.I also think he can really punish India if he goes through with his threats while India won't be able to return the favor as much.
He doesn’t have to keep it going forever, just as long as he can, preferably for as long as Trump is in office. When he loses his effectiveness, watch the other generals suddenly look for a democratic replacement.
That’s been the pattern for since 1947.He doesn’t have to keep it going forever, just as long as he can, preferably for as long as Trump is in office. When he loses his effectiveness, watch the other generals suddenly look for a democratic replacement.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.