Collaboration with Swift Ships USA.
"indigenous" is a term we use incorrectly among all armed forces. We basically attach "indigenous" to each and everything even if anything is transfer of technology. Indigenous is something which you achieve without any outside help, completely utilizing local resources & man-power.
The most Indigenous Pakistan program was its nuclear program as we could not have used any other country's help. Even your strongest allies won't help you in such thing. Except nuclear weapon capability, none of the major defense projects can be called as totally indigenous.
Military PR teams should be made aware that "indigenously build" is incorrect statement. It should be "locally built".
BTW, I don't know why PN needed a foreign company like Swift Ships for collaboration in such a small gunboat program. Having ToT experience in building Azmat FACs locally (which are probably 3 times bigger) and even one of F22P frigate, one of big tanker. All with ToTs. Why is that we still require foreign vendors ?
@Quwa @arslank01 what are your thoughts on it? We should have had enough capability to design and produce upto 1K tonnage light corvettes till now. We are doing ToTs for quite a long period of time. I remember in 90s we were doing that with missile boats and using same wordings of "indigenous ships" in newspapers. But that cycle seems to be unending. We even built 90b subs with ToT and then PN chief said we have become from a submarine operating nation to submarine building nation. 25 yrs later exact same wordings are repeated for Hangors. But I understand submarines are very complex, lets just focus on smaller warships or missile boats / gunboats.