Pakistan Air Force | News & Discussions

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I think this proves Barnala got fked quiet thoroughly


The imagery is legit. Building partially covered with Tarpaulin. However, more evidence required to ascertain the damage.
 
@Pradotlc

Pakistan pounded India like there was no tomorrow.

Pounded it so thoroughly that there were satellite images to show for the damages. Sub mitti mein mil gaya.

Regards

india begged for a cease fire..the damage was heavy... Trump even stated on record


the problem with you people you think by showing a few holes in a run way is some thing special...

lol x 100

if I were an indian (thank good ness I am not) I would be worried India failed on all accounts

> capture / punish the killers - FAIL

> Lost planes, expensive radars and pounding of military assets as in the words of Pakistan military was more ordinance than then entire wars of 1965 and 1971 in 4 days

> the man you falsely accused of the terror attack has 2 hour lunch with Trump

> US constantly reminded that the cease fire was for India's benefit.

> Pakistanis and most of the world are convinced india has a lame military
 
@Pradotlc

india begged for a cease fire

So why did you award a Nobel to Trump?

you think by showing a few holes in a run way is some thing special...

You couldn't even show that

Regards
 
The imagery is legit. Building partially covered with Tarpaulin. However, more evidence required to ascertain the damage.



Tarp. cover has appeared as a part of the planning to improve infra. details!

is that normal? no..

or, in other words, damage (to be hidden by tarp. cover) appeared before the planning of infra. details!!!

my reading!


just like this...


1758101695898.png
 
Last edited:
The imagery is legit. Building partially covered with Tarpaulin. However, more evidence required to ascertain the damage.

Even if the damage is real, what is more interesting is that the layout of that complex makes it difficult to destroy. By having the buildings encircle a court yard like that, even a direct hit in the middle wont take about the surrounding buildings. At most you can take out 1/2 buildings with a bit on a building.

Had those buildings been clustered together next to each other, then a single strike could have done a lot more damage.

Interesting food for thought on how military complexes should be designed to prevent damage in the event of strikes ( though in this case, the design choice was most probably unintentional).
 
Think it like this for the other 3 Rafales:

If it was not for that indian soldier making the video about the Mig-29 Wreckage in Ramban, we would never have known about it visually (confirmation). There is a high chance no media evidence was leaked from the other 3 Rafale sites. The other 3 aircraft evidences came from relatively populated areas (Akhnoor, Pampore, Bhatinda). So do 2 + 2

Regarding at least one more Rafale other than the confirmed BS 001 kill at Bathinda, my theory is that at least one crashed somewhere over Kishtwar National Park, which has massive snowy peaks and a relatively small population, since it is a protected area with only a few nomadic families residing deep in somewhat dry cold valleys.

AVM Aurangzeb Ahmed did claim its kill over Kishtwar National Park, the specific name of the area was not mentioned though.

thisone.jpg

So, somewhere in this region, a Rafale lay wrecked in a glacial valley or on top of a massive peak, with its debris likely recovered later by Indian army soldiers after the conflict, due to the difficult terrain and under strict supervision to ensure that no footage was leaked. Moreover, as per my research, the area remains foggy and snowy in early May so no local footage? This could be one of the reasons.

dagger.jpg

Specifically around this region...

around here.jpg
 
Last edited:
India will learn from this humiliation so one can not get complacent, same set of conditions will unlikely manifest and taking on the Rafale in the future will be more difficult.

This is why I find the procurement of J35 very important, PAF needs to maintain an edge over a vastly conventional superior foe.
 
My previous post was deleted for "trolling".
I repost it, because I give a source, so all but trolling.

Now if you want to ban me because it's not what you intend to read, do it, but explain clearly why.
 
Best bit 1:



Indian Logic: (usually manifested by @Raj-Hindustani @Vkdindian1 and others)


IAF had already decided to improve infra. details at the AFB!

yeah, they could but why infra. work at this specific point, which is claimed by your adversary?!

infra. improvement work that too with tarps only at those specific points?!!


no openness, no evidence... right!
Who is right ?
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Who is right ?
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Not bright are you and you wonder why your posts get deleted.

"At 1230hrs on May 7, that attack came when the IAF bombed nine sites in Pakistan with long-range Spice 2000 precision-guided bombs. "

The PAF were referring to the initial bombs that hit civilians near the border.

But carry on with the BS Rakesh, suits you and the harder you cope, the more stupid you look.....
 
India will learn from this humiliation so one can not get complacent, same set of conditions will unlikely manifest and taking on the Rafale in the future will be more difficult.

This is why I find the procurement of J35 very important, PAF needs to maintain an edge over a vastly conventional superior foe.
We also need to prepare to take advantage. The escalation ladder needs stuffing down Modi's throat.
 
My previous post was deleted for "trolling".
I repost it, because I give a source, so all but trolling.

Now if you want to ban me because it's not what you intend to read, do it, but explain clearly why.
Poor Indians, same as 2019, all they can be proud of are remains of the missiles fired at them😂
 
The one question on my mind since May 6–10, 2025, is this: We were on high alert and had observed the deployment of large Indian jets to the northern bases, and we remained alert on the day of the IAF mission. So, when they launched air-launched missiles, why didn't we intercept them and instead allow them to hit our nine sites? I am aware that the response time for interception was very short, but does that mean that whenever we are attacked by air-launched missiles such as SCALP-EG, BrahMos, or HAMMER, we will be unable to intercept them due to the very limited time available? Or did we deliberately let them hit so that we could later justify our own actions?

on that 6/7th may we intercepted none? is it due to our own assets were also airborne ready to target the IAF assets that released payloads? to avoid our own attrition? or is there any other reason for zero interception at that night?

@Oscar @arslank01 @JamD @Bilal @Quwa @farooqbhai @Panzerkiel @side-winder
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


we spoke about it pretty heavily here.

Pak AD is inadequate, though, funnily enough, there is now, a brand new PAF program to induct the sort of SHORAD we discuss in the episode:

TVC
Agile
Quick response etc

CAMM-ER is being looked at, maybe IRIS-T.
 
My previous post was deleted for "trolling".
I repost it, because I give a source, so all but trolling.

Now if you want to ban me because it's not what you intend to read, do it, but explain clearly why.
great, tons of valuable intel from...spent motor casings...?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top