500th F-35 has been delivered to the US Air Force

Britain's billion-pound F-35s not quite ready for, well, anything

Stealth jets can't fight, can't fly much, and can't shoot UK missiles, says NAO​

Dan Robinson
Tue 15 Jul 2025

The F-35 stealth fighter is not meeting its potential in British service because of availability issues, a shortage of support personnel, and delays in integrating key weapons that are limiting the aircraft's effectiveness.

The various problems are highlighted in a reality check from the UK's National Audit Office (NAO) that offers a contrast to the typically measured tone of official government communications when it comes to the state of the country's armed forces.

Its report calls on the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to address these problems in the F-35 fleet: firstly to increase the effectiveness of the aircraft but also to demonstrate the program is delivering value for the huge cost it represents to the taxpaying public.

Britain currently has 37 of the F-35B variant of the aircraft, which is designed for short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) operations like the Harrier it effectively replaces in Royal Air Force (RAF) and Royal Navy service.

The NAO, a public sector spending watchdog, starts by noting that the F-35 offers capabilities "significantly superior to any previous UK aircraft," not just because of its low radar observability, but due to its advanced sensor suite including an electro-optical targeting system and long-range infrared target sensors, which are combined to provide the pilot with an integrated picture of the space surrounding them.

However, the report finds the MoD has not been able to deliver on its own targets for aircraft availability – the proportion of time each aircraft is ready to fly – despite these targets being lower than those for the global program.

It claims that last year, the UK F-35 fleet had a mission-capable rate (the ability of an aircraft to perform at least one of its seven defined missions) about half of the MoD's target. The full mission capable rate (the ability of an F-35 to perform all required missions) was only about one third of the MoD's target and significantly lower than for F-35B aircraft operated by other nations.

Some reasons behind this poor performance are cited as a shortage of engineers able to work on the F-35 in Britain's forces, plus a global shortage of F-35 spare parts.

In fact, the UK Lightning Force faces "major personnel shortages across a range of roles," which the NAO says are not likely to be resolved for several years, although it notes the MoD is recruiting to fill some of these gaps.

According to the report, the MoD has previously underestimated the number of engineers and other staff required to support F-35 aircraft during operations.

This was highlighted during Operation Fortis, the UK-led carrier strike group deployment to the Pacific in 2021, when an aircraft was lost after a protective engine blank was erroneously left in one of the air intake ducts. This led to the aircraft not being able to generate enough thrust for take-off and ditching in the sea immediately after leaving the flight deck of HMS Queen Elizabeth.

As reported by Navy Lookout, the US Marines F-35 squadron that was onboard the carrier at the same time had 25 personnel for each jet, while the British squadron had only 14.

Just as worrying are the ongoing delays in getting key weapons integrated with the F-35 so that they can be used in operations. The report states that the original support date for the Spear 3 air-to-surface cruise missile and the Meteor medium range air-to-air missile was December last year, but the F-35 is not expected to get these until the early 2030s.

These delays have been caused by "poor supplier performance," the NAO says, referring to the US defense firm responsible for the F-35, Lockheed Martin. However, it also criticizes Britain's MoD for "negotiating commercial arrangements that failed to prioritize delivery" and the low priority given to Meteor by the global program.

This means that UK F-35s are currently only capable of operating with the Paveway IV laser-guided bomb and US-made missiles such as the AIM-120D.

Part of the problem is that support for many of the key weapons British forces wish to use was planned for the Block 4 upgrades to the aircraft's systems software, and these have been massively delayed. Much of the blame for this lies with Lockheed Martin and the Joint Program Office (JPO), the agency within the US Department of Defense (DoD) responsible for overseeing the F-35 program.

It was originally expected that this would be fully delivered by 2022, but the NAO says that in 2023 the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that it would not be delivered until 2029, and now the JPO doesn't expect Block 4 to be completely delivered before 2033.

There has been a certain suspicion that the US doesn't see supporting European-made weapons as a priority, especially when F-35 operators are then forced to buy American kit instead.

Small wonder, perhaps, that Britain is pushing ahead with a program for its planned next-generation fighter – currently codenamed Tempest – that does not involve any US defense companies but partners with Japan and Italy instead.

However, the NAO report claims that UK F-35 program officials are concerned slow progress towards the country's stated total goal of 138 aircraft could "jeopardize the UK's position within the global program."

It says that despite being the UK's only Tier 1 partner nation on the F-35 program, Australia had received 72 aircraft by the end of 2024 against a public commitment of 100, Norway had fulfilled its commitment of 52 F-35s by April of this year, and Britain's tardiness on issuing further orders "has been noted by partners."

The UK government has, however, recently disclosed that it intends to procure a new tranche of F-35 aircraft which will comprise a dozen of the F-35A version, which operates from an airfield, along with another 15 F-35B, although delivery of these is not expected until the end of the decade.

Adding another variant of the F-35 is unlikely to help with the engineer shortage, since there are significant differences between the two versions.

Meanwhile, the MoD is also behind in delivering the Aircraft Signature Assessment Facility, which is needed to check that the F-35's much-vaunted stealth technology is doing its job and has not been degraded by the harsh conditions of operating at sea.

This was originally delayed for "affordability reasons" and is currently not scheduled for delivery until the next decade.

The NAO report offers a number of recommendations for the MoD, including that it should consider what structural changes it can make to more effectively deliver on the F-35 program.

We asked the MoD for its response, and a spokesperson told us: "The program continues to operate within its approved budget and the UK will have two squadrons of F-35 fighter jets ready for deployment by the end of this year." ®
 
They should not be trying to antagonize the Russians. They have handled them very badly.

UK is not a war machine and certainly never will be capable of fighting Russia along with the rest of the little weak euro states.

They all think they are mini USA's.
 

F-35’s modernization delayed as costs expand by $6B

by Eric E. Garcia
September 8, 2025 5:16 pm

An F-35 fighter jet flies behind a blue sky.
A new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office shows Lockheed’s F-35 Lightning II fighter jets are mission-ready only 55% of the time. The F-35 is assembled at a Lockheed plant in Fort Worth. The jets are maintained at military repair depots across the U.S. (Courtesy photo | Liz Lutz, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics)

A batch of orders for the Fort Worth-assembled F-35 Lightning II fighter jet will take five years longer to fulfill as costs escalate $6 billion over original estimates, according to a new U.S. Government Accountability Office report.

Technology Refresh 3 upgrades to the Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. jets’ hardware and software components are delaying the Block 4 orders, which will now be complete in 2031.

The F-35 program — which the government watchdog office says has unique capabilities crucial to national security — will be placed under a new congressionally mandated defense department subprogram “to help meet cost, schedule and performance goals,” officials said in the report.

F-35 deliveries, which are contracted in batches, were late by an average of 238 days last year, up from an average of 61 in 2023, according to the GAO report. A 2024 GAO report estimated that the batch would initially be completed in 2029.

The report noted that defense contractor Pratt & Whitney, an East Hartford, Connecticut-based subsidiary of RTX Corp., also was late in delivering F-35 engines.

Lockheed Martin officials said the company’s delivery performance improved this year.

“The F-35 is combat proven, offers the most advanced capability and technology, and is the most affordable option to ensure America and its allies remain ahead of emerging threats,” a Lockheed Martin spokesperson said in a statement. “In partnership with the F-35 Joint Program Office, we will deliver 170-190 F-35s this year and continue fielding Block 4 capabilities to ensure the F-35 maintains its unmatched dominance in the skies.”

At an Aug. 14 event at an F-35 subcontractor factory in Mansfield, Edward “Stevie” Smith, director of F-35 strategic initiatives for Lockheed Martin Aeronautics, said the company delivered at least 110 jets this year — better performance than any other fighter jet’s production.

“That is more production capacity than the rest of the world’s fighter capacity combined, bar none, built right here in Fort Worth, Texas,” he said.

The defense department’s evaluation of Lockheed Martin’s capacity to deliver aircraft on time “would help determine how many aircraft the program should plan to purchase,” according to the government accountability report.

The department — which President Donald Trump renamed the Department of War with an executive order Sept. 5 — plans to work with the company to deliver technology capabilities to the warfighter “at a more predictable pace than in the past,” according to the report.

The department paid companies, including Lockheed Martin, millions in incentive fees for on-time deliveries even if they were 60 days late, according to the report.

“To avoid rewarding late deliveries, the program should reevaluate its use of fees in future contracts and better align them to achieve desired production outcomes,” the report read.

Accountability officials noted that Lockheed Martin should expand its use of modern design tools, including digital models that developers can test in a simulated environment, to increase delivery performance.

The Pentagon estimated it will cost more than $2 trillion to maintain and operate the planned 2,470 F-35 jets over a 77-year period.

The Government Accountability Office made six recommendations to the defense department to improve F-35 deliveries. Among them, the department should reevaluate the use of contractor incentive fees and expand and formalize the use of “leading practices” for aircraft production.

The Department of Defense, which cited actions to address delivery problems, concurred with four recommendations and partially concurred with two others.

The F-35 program saw upgrades in foreign orders as Lockheed Martin delivered more than 1,200 aircraft worldwide to a growing list of allies, partners and U.S. military branches.

“It is now only strengthening our U.S. alliances, both over in Europe and in the Pacific theater as well, but also bringing up new customer sets and aligning very well with this current administration’s policy of having our allies and partners being able to fight their own fights in their backyard alongside our U.S. servicemen,” Smith said at the Mansfield event.

In August, the Pentagon awarded Lockheed Martin Aeronautics an $8.2 million cost-plus-fixed-fee contract modification for Australia’s F-35 program. About 65% of the work will be completed in Fort Worth with the remainder expected to be performed in Australia, according to the defense contract listing.

 
They should not be trying to antagonize the Russians. They have handled them very badly.

UK is not a war machine and certainly never will be capable of fighting Russia along with the rest of the little weak euro states.

They all think they are mini USA's.
Yet they always send ships to patrol South China Sea and even Taiwan strait, UK is just an US slave.
 
lol, last for 200 years maybe, like US subways, good luck with them.
Well, a lot of the modern air forces around the world are still flying the F-16s built in the previous century. And, guess what? No one is complaining.

The US still imposes restriction who can get new F-16s.
 
okay so the direct energy weapon of block 4 is delayed due to the engine upgrade not being ready.

We should just throw everything away?

the latest F-35 Block 4 upgrade program includes upgraded engines that can generate more electricity, likely with direct-energy integration in mind.

6762-f775fa21dd910afaaeb70bf4898f0b95.jpg
 
Last edited:
Well, a lot of the modern air forces around the world are still flying the F-16s built in the previous century. And, guess what? No one is complaining.

The US still imposes restriction who can get new F-16s.
You guys can stick to them for a hundred years, no problem.
 
It will be a blessing for Pakistan if India buys F35 without TOT and source code.
 
Everything the UK mod does goes crap. Everything.
Well, MOD insisted that the F-35 was to have the capability to use MBDA stuff, which accounts for almost half of these delays. I mean, if you look at the Australian transition from F-18E/F to F-35, it just took 16 months because we are using all the American package that carries from the Superhornet (JDAM, CAIM-9X, CAIM-120, and so on) the RAF took almost 3 years (And the IOC of F-35B does not help)

The mistake MOD made here is not to start the conversion early, or simply overestimating their capability. Think now the RAF either needs to go without these capabilities or maybe order an American package for the interim.
 
They should not be trying to antagonize the Russians. They have handled them very badly.

UK is not a war machine and certainly never will be capable of fighting Russia along with the rest of the little weak euro states.

They all think they are mini USA's.
Meh, even the Eurofighter is enough to deal with the Russians.The Russian Navy is honestly shit; the Brits had nothing to worry about. I mean, if they can't take Snake Island off 140 miles from their base in Crimea, how do you think they can do anything thousand miles away from Kaliningrad........
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top