Bangladesh - India News / Discussions

[lightoftruth]

Sell your lies elsewhere. Bangladesh repatriated thousands through proper channels over the years.

Here is a small example - https://www.thedailystar.net/news/bangladesh/news/91-bangladeshi-fishermen-return-india-4192736

You keep trying with your illegal push in, and we will push back. All the best.

You definitely won't be winning hearts in Bangladesh with your push ins.

I have quoted MEA statement on repatriation & you are bringing arrested fishermen ?

You have been pushing people for money for decades , we are just starting.

If pushing illegal people back to their country hurts bangladeshis ,so be it.

we don't care , India is not a dharamshala.

 

[Master Chief]

That is not true. Just take this forum as an example, you won't find a single Indian, regardless of religion hating Indian Muslims.

However you will find many Bangladeshi and Pakistani Muslims who have hatred of Hindus, may that be thier own citizens.

Prove such claims. Or shut up.

For hatred of Indian Muslims, you need but to watch the news and see what BJP members say and do routinely. If you support BJP, then you are part of the problem.

Conversely, we know full well what Indians think of Pakistani hindus, never mind Pakistani muslims.

Killing of Pakistani Hindus in India to be raised at every forum: PTI legislator

"Protection of minorities is the government’s responsibility," says Ramesh Kumar Vankwani.

www.dawn.com

 

[Jaeger]

Are you from West Bengal? Most definitely not. Clearly you have no idea how many Muslims stayed back in India post partition.

It may defy your common sense, but plenty of Muslims and Hindus stayed put and didn't migrate in 1947. They chose to stay where their roots are.

Will you accept Bangladesh pushing 20 million or so Hindus into India?

Your lack of knowledge about the history of the people in this region doesn't change the reality.

As for documentation - the burden is on you to prove they are not Indian. You cannot just simply push people into foreign country because they don't subscribe to your Hindutva ideology.

Do you want to push out your Hindus, because you believe they are not Bangladeshis or do you want to push them out because they are Hindus.

If its the former we will accept them, if it is the later this government will still accept them.( which i don't agree,that they should).

We don't want to push any Indian Muslim into Bangladesh. The are Indian as any Indian, but we should not accept a single illegal Bangladeshi in our midst.

That is why i asked you what documentation do you need from an Illegal migrant that will prove his nationality?

Bengali Muslims who can not prove the Indian citizenship of their parents or grand parents will be treated as Bangladeshi.

 

[Jaeger]

Prove such claims. Or shut up.

For hatred of Indian Muslims, you need but to watch the news and see what BJP members say and do routinely. If you support BJP, then you are part of the problem.

Conversely, we know full well what Indians think of Pakistani hindus, never mind Pakistani muslims.

Killing of Pakistani Hindus in India to be raised at every forum: PTI legislator

"Protection of minorities is the government’s responsibility," says Ramesh Kumar Vankwani.

www.dawn.com

Which claim do you want me to prove that some Bangladeshi and Pakistani posters in this forum hate their own minority citizen?

Just check out this very thread where many Bangladeshis are threatening to remove citizenship of their Hindu population and send them to India, just because India is returning their illegal migrants back.

 

[Master Chief]

Which claim do you want me to prove that some Bangladeshi and Pakistani posters in this forum hate their own minority citizen?

Just check out this very thread where many Bangladeshis are threatening to remove citizenship of their Hindu population and send them to India, just because India is returning their illegal migrants back.

It is you who claimed spuriously and with zero evidence that two nation theory precludes the retention of Muslim minorities in Indian bordering states.

What bizarre theory is this that you are scraping at purely to justify some form of impending ethnoreligious "homogenisation" in said states?

Never mind that every census of religious orientation ever held in these states will immediately refute your claim.

There can't possibly be any mosques in Punjab, Gujarat, or Bengal either.

It gets more and more delusional every time you repeat this theory back.

Just because Pakistan and Bangladesh exist, it automatically means every Muslim in a neighbouring state should have emigrated there?

I've never heard such bollocks from you since the last time you spoke bollocks (likely about a week ago).

Let's be clear. If Muslims suddenly empty out of ANY state in Hindustan, it is because they are being pushed. This is the model you learned in tandem with the illustrious "fatherland".

 

[uksyl]

Which claim do you want me to prove that Bangladeshi and Pakistani posters in this forum hate their own minority citizen?

Just check out this very thread where many Bangladeshis are threatening to remove citizenship of their Hindu population and send them to India, just because India returning illegal migrants back.

This is rhetoric by Jamaatis and others. They also hate other Muslims and Bangladeshis including:

- Calling the current nationalist BNP government, the 'B team' of the Awami League or Awami League version 2.


- Calling any Muslim who doesn't agree with their evil anti-India, anti-Hindu agenda as a RAW agent, Hindutva bootlicker etc. Like ISIS and other extremists in the middle east, any Muslim who doesn't support them is either a 'Kafir' (infidel) or not a real Muslim like them (Jamaatis/ISIS).

In reality Bangladeshi Islamic scholars say it is haram (forbidden) for people to vote for Jamaat and these Jamaatis are a small, powerless minority in Bangladesh who are hated. I can provide lots of example.

However whereas we Bangladeshis have got Jamaatis under control e.g.:
They have to sing our anthem, amar shona Bangla (which they hate)
They have to stand under our flag (which they hate).

Jamaatis on this forum and elsewhere are now in meltdown and crying because our government appointed a new chairman for a traditionally Jamaati-run bank called 'Islami bank'.

It is socially and politically unacceptable for a politician in Bangladesh to promote rhetoric openly targeting Hindus and other non-Muslims.

In India you have elected Hindutva extremists and Muslim-haters to power and now they seek to implement a Nazi-style program of ethnic cleansing in West Bengal, which they will not be permitted to do and which could even reshape the map of south Asia, which we Bengalis have done a couple of times before.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[uksyl]

Btw this thread is relevant and I am monitoring the anti-Muslim fascist nature of the BJP and their attempts to promote hatred in West Bengal.

U

Thread 'Impact of BJP victory in West Bengal on Bangladesh'

May 5, 2026

What do members here think about the impact of the controversial BJP victory in West Bengal on Bangladesh?

I think this is extremely bad news for many reasons.
1. The BJP are obviously an anti-Islamic hate-organisation involved in the murder and lynching of Muslims.
2. They are anti-Bengali as they are basically dominated by BIMARU fascists from the Hindi belt who think "Hindi" is the real Indian language and Bengali is either not really an "Indian" language or on the same level as Hindi.
3. The BJP are clearly fascists who have no interest in democracy and removed millions of Muslims...

• uksyl
• Replies: 203
• Forum: Members Club

• 
• 

It also includes updates on the volatile internal situation in India e.g.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Jaeger]

It is you who claimed spuriously and with zero evidence that two nation theory precludes the retention of Muslim minorities in Indian bordering states.

What bizarre theory is this that you are scraping at purely to justify some form of impending ethnoreligious "homogenisation" in said states?

Never mind that every census of religious orientation ever held in these states will immediately refute your claim.

There can't possibly be any mosques in Punjab, Gujarat, or Bengal either.

It gets more and more delusional every time you repeat this theory back.

Just because Pakistan and Bangladesh exist, it automatically means every Muslim in a neighbouring state should have emigrated there?

I've never heard such bollocks from you since the last time you spoke bollocks (likely about a week ago).

Let's be clear. If Muslims suddenly empty out of ANY state in Hindustan, it is because they are being pushed. This is the model you learned in tandem with the illustrious "fatherland".

Since you are Pakistani, tell us this what was the percentage of non Muslim in Lahore before partition and what is percentage of non Muslim in Lahore now and what happened?

 

[Master Chief]

Since you are Pakistani, tell us this what was the percentage of non Muslim in Lahore before partition and what is percentage of non Muslim in Lahore now and what happened?

Yet more garbage being layered on top of the rest of your narrative. Explain firstly why you made your statement that somehow the creation of Pakistan and India in 1947 predicates the necessary emptying of border states of minority faith groups. Sure, plenty did go willingly and plenty were also pushed out against their will, but plenty stayed and indeed, the right to stay in one or the other nation as a minority was a precisely dictated stipulation of your nation's true father, Lord Viceroy Mountbatten (sorry Israel!). Any Hindu who wanted to stay in Pakistan could, regardless of them being in a border state or not. Any Muslim could likewise stay in India.

You seem to be forgetting your own history in your rush to leverage influence over Bengalis.

 

[Jaeger]

Yet more garbage being layered on top of the rest of your narrative. Explain firstly why you made your statement that somehow the creation of Pakistan and India in 1947 predicates the necessary emptying of border states of minority faith groups. Sure, plenty did go willingly and plenty were also pushed out against their will, but plenty stayed and indeed, the right to stay in one or the other nation as a minority was a precisely dictated stipulation of your nation's true father, Lord Viceroy Mountbatten (sorry Israel!). Any Hindu who wanted to stay in Pakistan could, regardless of them being in a border state or not. Any Muslim could likewise stay in India.

You seem to be forgetting your own history in your rush to leverage influence over Bengalis.

If my narrative is garbage. Why are you not able answer a simple question about non Muslim population of Lahore before and after partition?

Your honest answer on above will tell us, what happened to the minority populations during the partition especially in the border regions.

 

[Master Chief]

If my narrative is garbage. Why are you not able answer a simple question about non Muslim population of Lahore before and after partition?

your

Gosh you must think I'm really that stupid.

Because the answer makes no difference to the point being made!

You claimed "no Muslim would stay in a border state saar! Just as no hindu would! It is impossible that 2 nation theory permits this!".

I pointed out that this assertion is a false and baseless narrative, designed to justify the spurious claim by those of your ilk that Bengali Muslims in West Bengal can't possibly be a genuine population of Indian citizens and must somehow be "illegals".

It surprises me that you double down on this tripe around these parts, where your routines are well established.

 

[Jaeger]

Gosh you must think I'm really that stupid.

Because the answer makes no difference to the point being made!

You claimed "no Muslim would stay in a border state saar! Just as no hindu would! It is impossible that 2 nation theory permits this!".

I pointed out that this assertion is a false and baseless narrative, designed to justify the spurious claim by those of your ilk that Bengali Muslims in West Bengal can't possibly be a genuine population of Indian citizens and must somehow be "illegals".

It surprises me that you double down on this tripe around these parts, where your routines are well established.

Firstly there always will be a minority population in India, even in border states, because India unlike Pakistan was established as secular country, for all faiths to resides in, with no preference being given to one particular faith. However their numbers would not as high as they are today, which is mainly due illegal migration from Bangladesh.

Lets take Assam as an example which is border state of Bangladesh. Their Muslim population at the time of partition was mere 12 percent, it has reached almost 40 percent, why do you that has happened ?

Population of Muslims in Assam now 40%, surge a big issue: Sarma

The Muslim population in Assam has risen to 40% in the past seven decades and the change in demography has become a “matter of life and death”, chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said on Wednesday. | India News

www.hindustantimes.com