Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
- Feb 19, 2023
- 9,594
- 12,002
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every party must adhere to the rules of international law, including the rules on international humanitarian law. A key concept under both is proportionality. No one in their right mind can think Israel's response is proportionate and conducted in a way to minimise collateral damage, Israel themselves have admitted this (proudly) on many occasionsSo I guess the clear and simple answer is that there is no requirement for a "balanced" response by popular judgement, and that every party to a conflict has a duty to fight as best as it can with all available resources.
Every party must adhere to the rules of international law, including the rules on international humanitarian law. A key concept under both is proportionality.
Are you kidding me, all this time you posing empty questions?A source please, if you will. I would like to read up more on this aspect.
So I guess the clear and simple answer is that there is no requirement for a "balanced" response by popular judgement, and that every party to a conflict has a duty to fight as best as it can with all available resources.
I am just stating a reality too.
The oppression and apartheid, is a result of the occupation and apartheid that Israel has forced upon millions of Palestinians
Israel controls all the air space space space and borders of Palestine
Their are more then 7 million Arabs under Israeli occupation or control, that's more then the Jews in the region and it's only growing as Palestinian population increases
That demographic advantage Palestinians have is the biggest weapon against Israel
Keeping that much people living under occupation is not sustainable
That's why stopping good relations with the Arab and Muslim world is essential for the future
The Jews are detested at the moment and we need to take advantage of that
Are you kidding me, all this time you posing empty questions?
Its the rule of jungle yes.
But then why should the world care for 6 million who died in concentration camps in Europe. Why so much fuzz in the media and hollywood about that event? I mean, they just lost a fight…right?
Not only that, is it that a justification for creation of Israel?
It doesn't matter what Israel prefers. Even if they want to build a paradise it isn't right. They don't belong there. This is Palestinian land from the very beginning.
You were questioning before whether the principle existed and asked for a source, which was provided to demonstrate the principle.No. The issue here would be to the applicability of that law, given the nature of the combatants. Are both sides valid signatories to the applicable conventions, for example.
You were questioning before whether the principle existed and asked for a source, which was provided to demonstrate the principle.
A question around applicability is a different one and is changing the goal posts. I am not indulging this downward spiral, first it doesn't exist, now it doesn't apply.
The Israelis are not native to this land. The Palestinians are natives of this land. All reasonable human beings don't dispute this fact.
I think what @Dalit is referring to and I do agree [personal opinion] here is that the present day Israeli's who live in modern day Israel are not native to that part of the world. Besides I think almost everyone here knows the concept of Aliyah.Israel exist thousand years before arab migrated massively to Palestine land during Rashidun Caliphate and Ottoman Empire occupation.
There were Israel/Samaria and Judea Kingdom 2000 years ago, but there had never been Palestine Kingdom ever existed there throughout history.