Our narrative is "kill anyone who takes my house and kills my family". If that person happens to be Jewish, then that doesn't get them off the hook. The narrative would apply if the abuser were Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, or even another Muslim.
The fact remains that Jews have so completely brainwashed the Western psyche with their victimhood narrative (some of it justified, as in the Holocaust) that normal rules don't apply to them any more. If someone robs a bank or commits a crime, we don't shy away from calling them a criminal just because they are Jewish, but most Western people would be scared to do just that.
In this case, we have a military colonialist entity founded on the principles of racial and religious superiority. If anyone else did that, they would be called out but, since these racial supremacists are Jewish, we can't call a spade a spade.
The pager attacks are another example. They are clearly a war crime (aka terrorism) because the trigger was pulled indiscriminately. The person holding the pager could have been someone's child, a reservist noncombatant, or even someone flying a plane or driving a bus at the time. If a Muslim had done this, the Western media would be calling it terrorism but, since Israel did it, it is being glorified as a James Bond style masterstroke.