Pakistan Rocket Force Command News and Discussions

This sounds similar to Iranian missile cities, which is an approach that Pakistan should copy but problem is it's very expensive. Unlike Iranians, Russkies, Gulfies we can't just sell oil and gas and get megabucks.
whats makes you saw we dont have similar things? Maybe we have similar in number to iran...who knows
 
whats makes you saw we dont have similar things? Maybe we have similar in number to iran...who knows
During May 2025, Pakistan was firing missiles from out in the open. If possible offensive and even defensive systems should be housed if not employed from hidden bunkers if not from mountain tunnels.

For example, a good number of tunnels could be built in the salt range, and be located relatively close to the border.

We have missile complexes there currently, but from satellite imagery the way missiles are stored and brought to fire may not be as survivable in the age of faster and longer range munitions.

I hope the lessons of the Iran wars of the last two years are really behind taken to heart, including shifting our fissile and missile production to undergo mountain locations. We may never know when hostile capabilities are matched with hostile intent, by adversaries near or far.
 
Yes it’s expensive, but if we also offer to build similar missile cities to the Saudis (who have a considerable mountain range approx 150 km north of Riyadh), who are looking for a way to deter Iran (and any others with nefarious plans against them) as our defense alliance partners, we would gain the expertise, technology and possible some funding assistance to do it in Pakistan. If Pakistan is ever called upon to employ kinetic means against an adversary of the Saudis and the Pakistani state agrees, having the missile bases inside Pakistan would be just as capable as having those bases inside Saudi, so conventional missile bases in Pakistan could be of use to the Saudis defense as fulfilling the spirit of the defense treaty.

Spread over the next 5-10 years, much could be built and could help employ a lot of Pakistani people, in Pakistan and Saudi.

Under the auspices of “mining”, much joint cooperation could be done.
I'm sure there are some solid fuel/chemical related inputs that only the Saudis can supply due to them being a major oil exporter too. So, with investment and R&D, they too would need to establish industrial units leveraging their strengths (of which there are many). Hence, in addition to parallel production lines, there is an opportunity for actual, industrial-layer integration between KSA and Pak.

China, India, etc., always make it a win-lose issue; we can make it win-win for the publics and nations involved.
 
I'm sure there are some solid fuel/chemical related inputs that only the Saudis can supply due to them being a major oil exporter too. So, with investment and R&D, they too would need to establish industrial units leveraging their strengths (of which there are many). Hence, in addition to parallel production lines, there is an opportunity for actual, industrial-layer integration between KSA and Pak.

China, India, etc., always make it a win-lose issue; we can make it win-win for the publics and nations involved.
Saudis are a leading exporter of DAP; Diammonium Phosphate, which among its many uses can be used as a thermal insulator for rocket motors.

For the Saudis, bringing in Pakistan as the contractor for strategic tunnel projects would be best placed for ensuring secrecy. Pakistan for its part would not want to harm this most valuable of partnerships and would do its utmost that it vetted anyone on the projects as well as prevented any leaks, to the best of its ability.

I don’t think it’s fair to compare Saudi and China. Frankly, all partners of Pakistan have interests that converge. We have seen in recent years where Saudi frustration with Pakistan has lead (in part) to change in Pakistan.

If there is to be deep cooperation, we have to look at where each nation could be of strategic benefit to the other in the economic domain, and frankly on a competitive basis.

For Saudi food security, especially after the danger of their water plants being threatened by Iran, it doesn’t make sense, IMHO, for the Saudis to deplete their water reserves and keep building water plants when they could be better off partnering with Pakistani farmers and helping to build out Pakistan’s water management infrastructure (as well as leaning on India to stick to the indus water treaty).

For the money they pump into the water plants, if they poured that into the “Pakistan flood control system” (2010/2011 proposal), as well as spearhead agricultural modernization, we would see arable land increase from 45 million acres to 70 million acres and crop yields increase 100-300% depending on the crop. The food could be exported to Saudi and other nations, and yield all involved high returns. Pakistan would then be a growing consumer of Saudi oil and gas and fertilizers.

This is the lowest hanging fruit for cooperation, alongside the pipeline from Saudi to Oman to Pakistan and on to India, IMHO.
 
Are we prepared to tackle it or suppose if there is full scale war than do we have means to deal with BMD of India.
 
Are we prepared to tackle it or suppose if there is full scale war than do we have means to deal with BMD of India.
Indian dont have the depth of interceptors to tacle Our somewhat large ballistic volleys , also most of indian BMD is around main cities and is not the whole country . So indian wont use BMD(a mainly high altitude system) on sum tactical BMs...
 
Indian dont have the depth of interceptors to tacle Our somewhat large ballistic volleys , also most of indian BMD is around main cities and is not the whole country . So indian wont use BMD(a mainly high altitude system) on sum tactical BMs...
Do we have cruise missile and Mirv blasitc missiles type or cruise nuclear missile to tackle it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top