India denies entry to UK academic visiting to ‘speak on democratic values’

Waz

Administrator
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
27,583
Reaction score
72,119
Reputation
9,777.6
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
1708958431960.png

British writer and professor of Indian origin has said she was refused entry into India and deported back to the UK because of her opinions on “democratic and constitutional values”.
Nitasha Kaul, a professor at the University of Westminster in London, alleged she was blocked at the airport and denied entry to the country due to “orders from Delhi”.

Ms Kaul said she arrived at southern India’s Bengaluru airport to participate as a speaker in the two-day Constitution and National Unity Convention over the weekend.

But after landing in Bengaluru she was denied permission to enter through immigration, despite having a valid visa, she wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter.

“I was given no reason by immigration except ‘We cannot do anything, orders from Delhi’,” Ms Kaul wrote in a thread attaching her documents.

“I received no notice or info in advance from Delhi that I would not be allowed to enter.”

1708958526923.png

Ms Kaul alleged that she had to spend several hours at immigration without being provided with any explanation about the situation and was then held in a cell for 24 hours under CCTV observation.

Her movements were restricted in the cell that had only a narrow area for her to lie down, without easy access to food and water.

made dozens of calls to airport for basic things such as a pillow and blanket, which they refused to provide,” Ms Kaul said on X.

1708958612902.png

The political science professor claimed that the officials “informally made references to my criticism of the RSS, a far-right Hindu nationalist paramilitary from years ago”.

In 2019, Ms Kaul served as a key witness before the United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs, testifying about human rights violations in Indian-administered Kashmir after the abrogation of Article 370, which had granted special status to the region.

“I have traveled to India numerous times since. I was invited by a state government but refused entry by the central government,” she wrote.

For years, Ms Kaul said, she has been threatened with rape and death by “right wing Hindutva (Hindu nationalist) trolls” but had dismissed them as not serious.

On Sunday, she expressed concern for her safety, saying: “If I come to any accident, it probably merits a closer look.”

After her 24-hour ordeal, Ms Kaul was deported back to London on a British Airways flight.

Ms Kaul compared herself to “the ranks of the Tibetan exiles and Ukrainian exiles, and others throughout history who have faced the arbitrary exercise of brute unreasoning power”.

“Banning academics, journalists, activists, writers from India in spite of all valid documents is pathetic,” Ms Kaul wrote.

Rizwan Arshad, a politician of the opposition Congress Party and Member of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly (MLA), the state where Ms Kaul had been invited to speak, slammed the Narendra Modi government and called Ms Kaul’s deportation “unfortunate” and an “insult” to the state of Karnataka.

However, the BJP’s Karnataka wing took to X to thank security agencies at immigration for catching an “anti-India element” and termed Ms Kaul a “Pakistani sympathiser”.

In recent years, India has denied entry to several academics and journalists who have written or spoken against the Modi government.

In 2022, India deported a renowned University of Sussex anthropologist whose research involves southern Indian Muslims without giving an official reason for doing so.

Vanessa Dougnac, a French journalist, announced she was leaving India earlier this month after working in the country for two decades. She was prevented from working as a journalist in India depite having Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) status, a form of permanent residency, as a result of what the government termed her “malicious and critical” reporting.

Four OCI card-holding journalists have so far been refused permission to work in India, according to Reporters Sans Frontiers (RSF). The organisation’s latest World Press Freedom Index ranks India in 161st place out of 180 countries.





I don't really post anything on internal Indian affairs but she is British. Both political sides took a different view to her deportation i.e. BJP wanted her gone and called her behavior treason, Congress wanted her there.
 
Lol. Who the hell is she to tell us about democracy and constitution. She should stick to her own country.
 
Because a bhakt said so? You need to realize, for some people, echo chambers are orgasmic.
The ability, to patiently listen to an opposing view, requires an actual spine.
I wouldn't have reacted to that utterly silly remark, but the sheer impertinence caught me unawares.
 
IMO, bhakts / bigots need to be put in their place. Glad that you did reply.
Now, THAT is a difficult statement to fathom.

What IS their place?

Here is an acknowledged expert on a prominent social engineering network, with extensive links to politics, and to a very large number of front organisations that are intended to split the nation into small parts, invited by a Minister in a State Government, issued a visa to enter India, being detained by immigration and returned to her originating airport.

How bizarre - bizarre is the closest, nothing stronger seems to be available - is this sequence?
 
Why does I want to be lectured by a stupid liberal? India is a civilizational country and as such we have our own values. We don't need some outsider lecturing us. I also don't need someone questioning our democracy just because they don't like who we put up as our PM. We will make such people irrelevant w.r.t to India.

Also, tell me how can I ignore you on this forum? I really abhor your viewpoints.
 
Why does I want to be lectured by a stupid liberal?
How do your wishes determine immigration policy?
India is a civilizational country and as such we have our own values.
What is a civilisational country? A country with a history of civilisation? Does that mesh with uncivilised behaviour, like denying the right of a state government to invite a scholar critical of the entities that rule at the centre?
We don't need some outsider lecturing us.
Who is the 'we'? Do you speak of the minority of around 40% whom your views might resonate with, or the 60% who would question your opinions?


I also don't need someone questioning our democracy just because they don't like who we put up as our PM.
The PM featured nowhere in the entire matter. The topic for discussion was the RSS.


We will make such people irrelevant w.r.t to India.
Clearly, at the moment, 'we' that you keep speaking about has failed, as you were forced to deny entry to someone whose arguments you (='we') could not answer.
Also, tell me how can I ignore you on this forum?
Quite easy.

You need a sandy plot of land, and a spade. Detailed instructions will be available on payment of a small fee.


I really abhor your viewpoints.
That is truly reassuring. It is good to have one's point of view abhorred by certain kinds of minds and personalities.
 
How do your wishes determine immigration policy?

What is a civilisational country? A country with a history of civilisation? Does that mesh with uncivilised behaviour, like denying the right of a state government to invite a scholar critical of the entities that rule at the centre?

Who is the 'we'? Do you speak of the minority of around 40% whom your views might resonate with, or the 60% who would question your opinions?



The PM featured nowhere in the entire matter. The topic for discussion was the RSS.



Clearly, at the moment, 'we' that you keep speaking about has failed, as you were forced to deny entry to someone whose arguments you (='we') could not answer.

Quite easy.

You need a sandy plot of land, and a spade. Detailed instructions will be available on payment of a small fee.



That is truly reassuring. It is good to have one's point of view abhorred by certain kinds of minds and personalities.
Lol. Seems like unemployed people has a lot of time to spend on this forum.

We deported her, didn't we? Lol. 400 paar iss bar. 60% my foot. Do you assume those voting for TDP, BJD, AKALIS, Shiv Sena, YSRCP, AIDMK and numerous other parties are voting against BJP or Hindutva? Why do you assume to include them into your fold.

I agree with your last statement.

I hope those with an anti hindu mindset live a miserable life in modi'fied India.

INDI alliance is against BJP, they all put together hasn't managed to secure as much vote as BJP alone in 2019. So stop speaking for others.

We will show the real Bharat, this time around. JUST wait and watch.
 
Last edited:
Lol. Seems like unemployed people has a lot of time to spend on this forum.
Yup. You've been noticed, no worries, no payment for spending your time here.
We deported her, didn't we?
LOL. Who's the 'we'? It's wonderful how the techno-coolies and the bhaktoras suddenly think they own the place, just because some jerk in Delhi has authority over the immigration zombies.


Lol. 400 paar iss bar. 60% my foot.
Oh? You have programmed the EVMs already? How did you know?


Do you assume those voting for TDP, BJD, AKALIS, Shiv Sena, YSRCP, AIDMK and numerous other parties are voting against BJP or Hindutva?
Think - for a moment will do.
They aren't voting FOR.

Why do you assume to include them into your fold.
MY fold? I don't have a fold, except on my forehead when I worry about how to explain the kinds of people who do support the BJP or Hindutva. THAT does account for a lot of folds.
I agree with your last statement.
Oh, good. Have you got your spade?


I hope those with an anti hindu mindset live a miserable life in modi'fied India.
How about the vast majority of Hindus, those outside the gobar belt, who are living a fine life, and wondering why the poor sods in modified India are living such miserable lives - that was the phrase, right?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top