Military denied Mansoor Ali Khan interview

[HAIDER]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Bilal]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

The anchor was pointing to some who started the tenure around 1 year ago. So either army chief or dg ispr.

 

[HAIDER]

Where did this tout came up with DG ISI. The anchor was pointing to some who started the tenure around 1 year ago. So either army chief or dg ispr.

You didn't get it ...notice some rift , someone from GHQ calls Mansoor and other deny through Kamran ....

 

[Goenitz]

You didn't get it ...notice some rift , someone from GHQ calls Mansoor and other deny through Kamran ....

It is not a rift. It is their typical behaviour. Even Bajwa refused many times when he gave interviews to Javed Ch or Mansoor or retracted some statements.

 

[HAIDER]

It is not a rift. It is their typical behaviour. Even Bajwa refused many times when he gave interviews to Javed Ch or Mansoor or retracted some statements.

May be ...main message to convey about Imran Khan disqualification for life ...

but enjoy Faiz Isa so called son speaks and grilling ...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[RescueRanger]

To be fair like I said in the original thread where this should have been posted...

A meeting with an institution | Mansoor Ali Khan

I want to begin by making it clear that regardless what ones opinion may be of Journalist/Anchor Mansoor Ali Khan, he seems to be only one that people/"Institutions" want to talk to. In this particular vLog, he has changed the format & spoke about a meeting with an Institution. If the Title of...

defencepk.com

These media touts are "users and abusers" if any convo did take place, it should be disclosed through proper channels and not some YouTube video with a salacious headline.

 

[HAIDER]

To be fair like I said in the original thread where this should have been posted...

A meeting with an institution | Mansoor Ali Khan

I want to begin by making it clear that regardless what ones opinion may be of Journalist/Anchor Mansoor Ali Khan, he seems to be only one that people/"Institutions" want to talk to. In this particular vLog, he has changed the format & spoke about a meeting with an Institution. If the Title of...

defencepk.com

These media touts are "users and abusers" if any convo did take place, it should be disclosed through proper channels and not some YouTube video with a salacious headline.

feel sorry for this class of journalist ..... @ziaulislam .. this is revise form of slavery ...

 

[RescueRanger]

@HAIDER you will recall this is what got quite a few active people on SM in hot water, presenting certain hearsay as "facts" and twisting narratives. It is dangerous, especially in the day and age of SM where information spreads like wildfire.

On this point I absolutely agree with the military, social media has indeed been weaponized.

 

[Bilal]

You didn't get it ...notice some rift , someone from GHQ calls Mansoor and other deny through Kamran ....

I wouldn’t read it that way. It’s just denying also while also delivering message.

 

[Goenitz]

@HAIDER you will recall this is what got quite a few active people on SM in hot water, presenting certain hearsay as "facts" and twisting narratives. It is dangerous, especially in the day and age of SM where information spreads like wildfire.

On this point I absolutely agree with the military, social media has indeed been weaponized.

Then military shd use it. Either they lack clarity and truth or capacity.
If they don't release correct info or indirectly, then conspiracy and mid/disinformation or opposition narratives will fill/take over the gap.

 

[HAIDER]

@HAIDER you will recall this is what got quite a few active people on SM in hot water, presenting certain hearsay as "facts" and twisting narratives. It is dangerous, especially in the day and age of SM where information spreads like wildfire.

On this point I absolutely agree with the military, social media has indeed been weaponized.

I think military should announce clear policy , that they don t invite or directly interact with any journalist. We only call press briefing/ conference. If you remember Bajwa statement " some lower rank take extra steps and those are not orders from top" .

 

[RescueRanger]

Then military shd use it. Either they lack clarity and truth or capacity.
If they don't release correct info or indirectly, then conspiracy and mid/disinformation or opposition narratives will fill/take over the gap.

Yes I agree, sadly ISPRs hesitance for using social media is due to the level of vitriol they receive. There was a video of some shaheed on an army fan page, the posts under that image of a shaheed made me sick to my stomach.

It would have been better for this to have have been discussed on a telecast where certain controls and filters apply.

Personally I think SM can be a force for good in information share, clarification, fact-checking etc etc. Once again missing the mark.

 

[RescueRanger]

I think military should announce clear policy , that they don t invite or directly interact with any journalist. We only call press briefing/ conference. If you remember Bajwa statement " some lower rank take extra steps and those are not orders from top" .

Agreed.

 

[Bilal]

I think military should announce clear policy , that they don t invite or directly interact with any journalist. We only call press briefing/ conference. If you remember Bajwa statement " some lower rank take extra steps and those are not orders from top" .

How on earth can they give official briefing and admit to clear case of article 6. Even in martial law they take legal cover through judiciary there is no way in hell they will officially admit to these things. Yes you can get we are neutral kind of official statements which everyone knows how true it is.

 

[Goenitz]

Personally I think SM can be a force for good in information share, clarification, fact-checking etc etc. Once again missing the mark

Yeah.. everything is good and bad depending upon its usage. Plastic, glass, fire, knife, etc. That cannot be avoided.

Yes, the comments under any shaheed/missile test are nauseating but one cannot avoid it. Army has to bear the brunt or live in a cocoon. Public is not their servant or juniors who always say Yes Sir and All is good, Sir! etc.

If not ISPR, then outsource it or manoeuvre around it.