• To help us reduce spam registrations, we kindly request new users to avoid using VPNs during sign-up. Accounts created via VPN may not be approved.

The U.S. is losing the global science race: STEM worker survey

Beijingwalker

Frequent Poster
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
88,594
Reaction score
110,741
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

The U.S. is losing the global science race: STEM worker survey

Dec 5, 2023 -Science

Scientist working in a lab

A scientist works at BioLabs Pegasus Park in Dallas, Texas, on Sept. 13. Photo: Shelby Tauber/Bloomberg via Getty Images

More than 75% of STEM-related workers say other nations have topped — or will soon surpass — the U.S in science and technology, according to a new report being published Tuesday.

The big picture: As the world's science and tech power centers shift, the U.S., China and other countries are racing to train — and competing to attract — top talent that can drive innovation and the economic growth and national security advantages that often stem from it.
  • The State of Science in America report from the non-partisan Science & Technology Action Committee (STAC) calls for the U.S. to develop a national science and tech strategy and for policymakers to at least double federal funding for scientific research over the next five years.
By the numbers: The report included a survey of nearly 2,000 people in the U.S. working in five sectors that intersect with science and technology — K-12 education, health care, business, military and national security, and science, technology, engineering and math (STEM).
  • Just 8% of respondents said the U.S. is the global leader in science and tech and is expanding its lead, according to the report.
  • In addition, "60% believe that China — not the United States — will be the global leader in science and technology in five years."
  • Nearly 80% of respondents working in the national security sector said China presented a national security threat to the U.S. — compared to 50% of STEM workers.
Between the lines: U.S. and Chinese scientists have historically worked together across scientific fields and have been among each other's top collaborators. But political strains between the U.S. and China and concerns about research security threaten that cooperation.
  • The report calls for U.S. collaboration with China on some key issues, such as climate change, while taking steps to minimize any research security risks.
Zoom in: Across all sectors, respondents identified a "lack of adequate K-12 STEM education" as the top obstacle to fueling science and technology in the U.S. Nearly 70% of respondents said the quality of the country's STEM education system is fair or poor.
  • Respondents said other hurdles included U.S. research being undermined by foreign countries, the scientific research process' red tape, the lack of a national science and technology strategy, and not enough funding for research and development.
Flashback: In 1945, Vannevar Bush, science adviser to President Franklin Roosevelt during World War II, laid out a framework for supporting science in the U.S. that centered on the federal government funding basic scientific research and training the next generation of scientists and engineers. His strategy involved private industry and then translating those discoveries into applications.

  • But today, private industry "cannot underwrite the level and time-course of targeted research and development or take on the risk or project a sufficient market required to devise applications founded on federally funded discovered knowledge," said Keith Yamamoto, vice chancellor for science policy and strategy at University of California, San Francisco, and a co-chair of STAC.
  • "The U.S. government is just beginning to show signs of recognizing that it must serve a critical catalytic role in advancing newly discovered knowledge into society-serving applications," said Yamamoto, who is president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
The sentiment is echoed in the survey: Roughly 40% of respondents said the federal government is primarily responsible for the strength of science and tech in the U.S., followed by private companies (23%), academic institutions (22%) and nonprofit organizations (4%).
  • The majority said the federal government should be spending at least somewhat more money on R&D.
  • Between 2010 and 2019, the share of research and development funded by the federal government decreased from 31% to 21%, according to the report.
 
TLDR: at least double federal funding for scientific research over the next five years.

LOL, everybody is using China as the bogeyman to squeeze more federal funding. The military and now the sciences. Wonder who's next...
 
TLDR: at least double federal funding for scientific research over the next five years.

LOL, everybody is using China as the bogeyman to squeeze more federal funding. The military and now the sciences. Wonder who's next...

But much of this is based upon the fact that China is indeed challenging USA for the lead in many, if not most, area, due to the rapid pace of its development.
 
If the U.S. research sector falls for the bait, I would imagine that the trap would be sprung on them as well, and they will be blocked from hiring ethnic Chinese researchers, totally screwing themselves over.

Do you mean to imply that research is beyond the capabilities of other ethnicities?
 
An enormous amount of the lead that the U.S. has in research is due to being able to siphon/drain talent from around the world.


It's very obvious where this line of agitation will lead, as I have already laid out.

But specifically, how does your claim of being "screwing themselves over" by a ban on "hiring ethnic Chinese researchers" have any merit? What you have laid out above therefore cannot be any more valid than a mere claim.
 
I have substantiated all my claims.

Please tell me where have you substantiated the claim that a potential ban on hiring ethnic Chinese researchers will screw over US research? Or is that too rhetorical for you?
 
4 rhetorical questions in a row.

But you have NOT been able to show the validity of your claim that a potential ban on hiring ethnic Chinese researchers will screw over US research.

:D
 
The loss will be even greater in coming future.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


and for America,

Is the US behind in math education?

According to the study, the U.S. now ranks sixth in reading, twelfth in science and 28th in math. The math scores of U.S. students fell 13 points since the last time the assessment was administered. Other countries saw a decline of 15 points on average.Dec 5, 2023
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top