Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[Majestic]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Again Firing at LOC in neelam sector. They really want some hard beating.

 

[Be dazzled]

I counted 21 Raphaels. Don't tell me we shot down 15 on 7th? Just saying.

 

[hnn]

every sane person knows, how to use twitter

in Pak, public use twitter much or take it seriously?



IDK

The answer to your question is self-evident on the queries from other member last night on this thread and the SM has become a disruptive force as of late, even you weren't sure as to whether the news was true or not.

Also, not to mention, "the proof is all over social media" haha - so I can safely conclude that people in Pakistan get rattled by X accounts posting fake news.

 

[Raja Porus]

The impact on PN, PAF and PA if IN carrier deploys around here ?

View attachment 156783


and what will be the impact if the deploys south of karachi ?

View attachment 156784

Scenario 1 : In range of Harbah (?)

Scenario 2: would've to take on PN submarine fleet which honestly I don't think IN planners have the confidence to.

Moreover their Vikrant itself (not the CSG) adds no great value with the Mig-29s and IN would be averse to losing it considering the International effect of losing only a few fighters recently

 

[Maarkhoor]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

all this comes at a very excessive cost, thats what this post supposed to say!

and, one cant have very large supply of REKs, at any particular point of time..!

in other words, REK create dilemma, which can only solved by having CMs

 

[Signalian]

But HQ9P seriously lack in capabilities as compared to HQ9B

Not according to PAF

 

[Signalian]

Scenario 1 : In range of Harbah (?)

Scenario 2: would've to take on PN submarine fleet which honestly I don't think IN planners have the confidence to.

Moreover their Vikrant itself (not the CSG) adds no great value with the Mig-29s and IN would be averse to losing it considering the International effect of losing only a few fighters recently

How many IN ships would it take to tie down most of PN fleet. Rafale M is coming for IN. which fighters would PAF send for targeting CBG and countering Migs ?

 

[bravo_1]

Mf's

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[PakistaniDefender]

Not according to PAF

Ok. HQ 9P is Pakistan army and HQ9BE is PAF

 

[Maarkhoor]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

@RescueRanger @Panzerkiel

Have a good laugh since I have said we hired a bhund (mashara) who decimating our enemy.

 

[Baibers_1260]

Mf's

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Here is another bit of sordid propaganda by enemy social media handles.
Pakistan can build whatever it wants on its own territory.
So if the enemy doesn't like it they can cry us a river.
Now that the enemy is getting walloped the social media is active.
Why do we need such posts here ?

 

[NA71]

This man will be responsible for next war with India:

 

[Mutakalim]

The impact on PN, PAF and PA if IN carrier deploys around here ?

View attachment 156783


and what will be the impact if the deploys south of karachi ?

View attachment 156784

In case of first image the carrier could be better defended from land based SAM coverage and IAF. However, is it a good strategy to deploy a prized asset so close to shore when the added capability is 1 to 2 squadrons of MIG 29? Why not move these squadrons to Air bases on land and supplement IAF assets.?

In second scenario, air cover from land based assets will be negligible and the carrier and its escort will have to defend itself from repeated attacks of PAF and PN.

The ideal deployment option is to position it outside the littoral waters of Oman, thereby creating an entirely new attack vector for the enemy where it will be compelled to defend itself from two sides. However, does IN and the carrier strike group have the capability to operate and effectively defend itself so far from its waters?

 

[Baibers_1260]

The ideal deployment option is to position it outside the littoral waters of Oman, thereby creating an entirely new attack vector for the enemy where it will be compelled to defend itself from two sides.

Some flaws in this strategy:
1. Oman won't like it and will likely start sharing location information with Pakistan using its maritime surveillance assets,
2.The USA won't like it either since this brings a risk of war into the Persian Gulf which is already tense with threats of multiple conflicts. The USA will likely share surveillance information with Pakistan.
3. Iran won't like it. Will behave somewhat like Oman but less effectively. given its limited assets.
4. Yemen won't like it either., not to mention Saudi Arabia, UAE & Qatar.
Regardless, from Gwadar and along the Makran coastline Pakistani ground based and air naval assets could easily launch anti-ship missiles, of course with the risk that if deflected these missiles could land in Oman or elsewhere. Hence my points 1-4 above. Not that Pakistan would care.