ToddE
Trusted Member
If your argument is that the Shah should have killed more Iranians then ok that's what you believe.
Same "Iranians" later did following:
- Mass Killings of (1988) thousands of Iranian political prisoners.
- Killings of student during protests in 1999.
- Killings, mass arrests and executions on 2009 election demonstrations, killings and mass arrests and executions so that Nuclear traitor Mr. Chimpnejad can win the fraud election.
- Killings of protesters during the 2017–2018 nationwide unrest.
- Mass killings during the November 2019 fuel protests “Bloody November”.
- Killings of hundreds during Mahsa Amini’s protests.
You were saying ? Besides if Revolution had not happened, Saddam would not have dared to attack Iran. He did that only because he saw weakness and oppurtunity. Million lives would have been saved.
I've had this discussion before with other forum members. The Iranian military during the Shah performed poorly despite the huge amounts of equipment given to it.
.... and IRI's military performs brilliantly right ? Lol this bunch has lost its generals, both inside and outside Iran, lost its key scientists because security setup is incompetent to the core. IRIAF is dead, IRIN is struggling to keep up, Airdefence failed in war despite heavy investments. Corrupt idiots put out one after another quick cash grab failure project that never goes into production. Literally IRGCAF alone provided minimal face saving in the war otherwise 1000 Iranians died and IRI did what in return ? Its not just this time, previously US and Israeli support to IRIAF (basically IIAF) saved IRI against EU+USSR fueled Baathist war machine otherwise may be million more Iranians would have died at hands of Arabs. Whatever Shahi military was, this group is incompetent on another level.
As far as the economy argument, I get that you're a hyper-capitalist, but high GDP doesn't mean prosperity. GDP was largely driven by oil exports and wealth was concentrated and unequal (just as it is now under IR).
Word Gizmos do not work in real world, money does. US and China are superpowers because they have unparallel wealth. No matter how you twist it, it wont change the fact that money matters and IRI is 3-4 times poorer that Shahi Iran. Same nation, same people got multifold poorer, can you guess why?
Even as stupid as Iranians are, they didn't revolt for fun.
Nobody revolted over GDP, Gini index lol Revolution was caused by Mullahs and Radical Leftists. Both of these groups had their own ideological agendas and had foreign support for that. This combination is still ruling Iran with Ayatollahs wasting money on ideological Islamism and IRI remains a mainly socialist economy, heavily dominated by Government.
It's like how the US has a rising GDP but living standards are going down, food prices are going up, and economic hardship is increasing for the average person while the wealthy now control over 50% of the country's wealth.
You cant be more wrong than that. Shahi Iranian Gini Index is almost same as IRI (~0.4). So your entire argument about "inequality" is just fundamentally wrong. IRI improved nothing in terms of distribution of wealth among Iranians.
"Moreover, while post-Revolution Iran has been less effective in reducing income inequality. The Gini coefficient (a common measure of income inequality, with zero representing maximum equality) has remained above 0.40, not much lower than it was in the early 1970s."
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-islamic-revolution-at-40/
Again, you were saying ?





