Maarkhoor
Snake Eater
Anything related to defense ? or you just facinated by the anti Muslim news?
Try same thing in India.
Japan Defence and General News Discussions
- Thread starter 冖_冖
- Start date
Anything related to defense ? or you just facinated by the anti Muslim news?
Try same thing in India.
Michael
VIP Member
Latest News:
The PLA Navy's Liaoning aircraft carrier group is operating in the waters east of the Miyako Strait. A J-15 carrier-based fighter jet used its fire control radar to illuminate a Japanese F-15J fighter jet.
The Japanese Self-Defense Forces issued a protest statement.
PLA Navy spokesperson's response:
Recently, the Chinese Navy's Liaoning aircraft carrier group conducted normal carrier-based fighter jet flight training in the waters east of the Miyako Strait, and the training area was announced in advance.
During this period, Japanese Self-Defense Forces aircraft repeatedly approached and harassed the Chinese Navy's training area, seriously affecting normal training and seriously endangering flight safety. The Japanese side's relevant claims are completely inconsistent with the facts. We sternly demand that the Japanese side immediately stop its slander and defamation, and strictly restrain its actions on the front line. The Chinese Navy will take necessary measures in accordance with the law to resolutely safeguard its own security and legitimate rights and interests.
The PLA Navy's Liaoning aircraft carrier group is operating in the waters east of the Miyako Strait. A J-15 carrier-based fighter jet used its fire control radar to illuminate a Japanese F-15J fighter jet.
The Japanese Self-Defense Forces issued a protest statement.
PLA Navy spokesperson's response:
Recently, the Chinese Navy's Liaoning aircraft carrier group conducted normal carrier-based fighter jet flight training in the waters east of the Miyako Strait, and the training area was announced in advance.
During this period, Japanese Self-Defense Forces aircraft repeatedly approached and harassed the Chinese Navy's training area, seriously affecting normal training and seriously endangering flight safety. The Japanese side's relevant claims are completely inconsistent with the facts. We sternly demand that the Japanese side immediately stop its slander and defamation, and strictly restrain its actions on the front line. The Chinese Navy will take necessary measures in accordance with the law to resolutely safeguard its own security and legitimate rights and interests.
ety
Trusted Member
Come, tough lady Sanae Takaichi, make good on your words, bring your JMSDF to fight PLAN around Taiwan and East China Sea now. China has taken military actions now responding to your and Japanese gov's provocation on Taiwan indeed.
Last edited:
ety
Trusted Member
If Japan were to actually wage war, there is a high probability that two Asian countries would disappear.
2025-12-08 21:25
Published in: Henan Province
The rise of militaristic forces within Japan in recent years is not unfounded, but rather a result of a series of political trends and policy adjustments. Sanae Takaichi, Japan's first female prime minister, within just one month of taking office, made remarks about Taiwan during a parliamentary debate, directly linking the Taiwan issue to Japan's survival. This statement directly challenged the One China principle, provoking a strong countermeasure from China.
Since the Shinzo Abe era, Japan has been continuously pushing for constitutional revision to expand the powers of the Self-Defense Forces. Now, with Sanae Takaichi taking over, this trend has been further strengthened. The conservative faction within Japan's Liberal Democratic Party is powerful, and they are using the US-Japan alliance to try to break free from the constraints of the post-war pacifist constitution and restore their so-called "normal" nation status.
If China and Japan were to truly descend into confrontation, Japan's geographical location would make it difficult for it to withstand a protracted conflict. The Japanese archipelago is long and narrow, its resources are reliant on imports, and its sea lanes are extremely vulnerable to disruption. Forward positions such as the Ryukyu Islands and Yonaguni Island are strategically vital locations, where Japan has deployed missiles and surveillance forces in recent years, but these facilities are extremely vulnerable in modern warfare.
China's missile technology is highly advanced, and its medium-range missiles launched from Sichuan and other locations have a wide coverage area and are plentiful. In the event of war, the military forces on these islands could be quickly paralyzed, leaving the Japanese mainland exposed to threat. While the US has numerous bases in Okinawa, whether the US will fully intervene is uncertain.
During the Biden administration, while the US-Japan alliance remained close, the US faced numerous domestic contradictions and needed proxy wars to deflect crises, which didn't necessarily mean the US would fully support Japan. Russia and North Korea might seize the opportunity to intervene, exerting pressure from the north. The Northern Territories issue for Japan was already unresolved, and war would amplify these potential problems. Ultimately, Japan might face territorial division, and its unified national structure might cease to exist. This is not sensationalism, but a deduction based on geopolitical realities.
Singapore plays an equally crucial role in this scenario. This city-state sits at the eastern entrance to the Strait of Malacca, controlling a vital shipping route between the Pacific and Indian Oceans. A quarter of global trade and a third of oil shipments pass through here, making Singapore's economy highly dependent on port entrepot trade.
In recent years, Singapore's foreign policy has been neutral yet proactive, actively participating in the South China Sea issue while also closely monitoring Sino-Japanese relations. As Prime Minister, Lawrence Wong attempted to mediate between China and Japan, but this was driven by his own considerations. If Sino-Japanese cooperation optimizes Arctic shipping routes or promotes trade facilitation in East Asia, the strategic importance of the Strait of Malacca would decline, consequently weakening Singapore's port advantages. Projects such as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor have already begun to divert some trade, causing Singapore significant concern. It maintains close ties with Japan, even becoming the first country to endorse Japan's stance, emphasizing Japan's peaceful role. However, Singapore's position in conflicts is complex; it relies on the US presence in the South China Sea while simultaneously maintaining close economic ties with China.
If war spills over into Southeast Asia, China may strengthen its control over the South China Sea, challenging the neutrality of the Strait of Malacca. Malaysia and Indonesia, as sovereign states in the strait, will exert pressure from both the north and south, causing Singapore to lose its dynamism and inevitably face economic decline. Ultimately, the country may fade from its independent status and integrate into the surrounding geopolitical landscape.
The root cause of the resurgence of Japanese militarism lies in the loosening of the post-war order. Under its Asia-Pacific rebalancing strategy, the United States has pushed Japan to strengthen its military, but this has also emboldened right-wing forces. Sanae Takaichi's fallacious arguments regarding Taiwan are essentially an attempt to drag the United States into the Taiwan issue and reignite Sino-US confrontation. However, China is not passive; the initiative remains in its own hands.
In recent years, China's military strength has steadily increased, its naval fleet is among the world's largest, and its missile technology is precise and efficient. Assuming war breaks out, Japan's missile sites, such as those on Yonaguni Island, would be nothing more than cannon fodder. If the Ryukyu Islands were destroyed, Japan's maritime lifeline would be severed, and its economy paralyzed. Russia might seize the opportunity to reclaim its northern territories, North Korea might join in the spoils, and the US might shift its stance to a more righteous, opportunistic role.
Japan could not escape the fate of being divided and stationed with troops, and from then on, a unified Japan disappeared. Singapore, having lost its strategic role in the Straits, was squeezed by Malaysia and Indonesia, its port trade shifted, and it gradually lost its independent vitality.
This assumption is not mere speculation, but based on current international developments. In November 2025, Sanae Takaichi's remarks will provoke Beijing's anger, leading to China summoning the Japanese ambassador and escalating diplomatic retaliation. Overseas media outlets such as the BBC have analyzed that this is a continuation of Takaichi's conservative stance, but it pushes East Asia to the brink of military confrontation.
China Daily website points out that her worship of the Yasukuni Shrine and her provocations across the Taiwan Strait endanger regional stability. The Tanzania Association for the Promotion of Peaceful Reunification of China condemns this as a disregard for history and reality. There is also opposition within Japan, with intense factional infighting within the Liberal Democratic Party, indicating it is not a monolithic entity. However, under the dominance of right-wing forces, Japan is moving towards becoming a militarily capable nation, posing a significant threat to peace in Asia.
404,您访问的页面已经不存在!
www-sohu-com.translate.goog
Last edited:
Ali_Baba
VIP Member
Japan protests after Chinese fighter jets lock radar on Japanese planes
China fighter jets lock radar on Japan planes as tensions rise
Tokyo has vowed a 'calm and resolute' response as tensions with Beijing continue to escalate.
www.bbc.co.uk
>> We don't know if Japanese fighters locked on first as China has not said anything about this incidence.
ety
Trusted Member
Japanese report reveals details! The distance at which the J-15 intercepted the F-15 is unbelievable; it locked onto it from such a distance.
2025-12-10 10:42
Published in: Shanxi Province
Amidst escalating international tensions, the direct confrontation between the air forces of China and Japan is becoming a focal point of global geopolitical attention. A key military data recently disclosed by Japan's NHK has sent shockwaves through the defense sector: a Chinese J-15 carrier-based fighter jet achieved radar lock-on at a distance of 148 kilometers during an aerial confrontation with a Japanese Air Self-Defense Force F-15J fighter jet. This incident not only starkly exposes the generational gap in air combat technology between the two sides but also reveals the potential risks of military confrontation in East Asia.
Behind the J-15's beyond-visual-range (BVR) combat advantages, its 148-kilometer radar illumination range is a key highlight—a distance exceeding the effective detection range of the F-15J. This means the J-15 can achieve the tactical advantage of "detecting and locking onto the enemy first," launching attacks without prior enemy detection. In contrast, the F-15J's current mainstay AN/APG-63(V)1 planar slotted radar has a maximum detection range of only 160 kilometers, and its detection range against fighter-type targets is further reduced to 120 kilometers. This technological gap signifies significant progress made by the Chinese Naval Aviation in the field of BVR combat.
A report released by the Japanese Ministry of Defense indicates that during this standoff, the J-15 locked onto an F-15J at a distance of 52 kilometers for the first time, maintaining the lock for three minutes. It then conducted a 31-minute radar illumination operation within a beyond-visual-range range of 148 kilometers. Faced with this situation, the Japanese pilot attempted to break the lock through maneuvers but ultimately failed, further confirming the J-15's absolute technological superiority in this confrontation.
The J-15T fighter jet currently in mass production and service is equipped with an advanced gallium nitride active phased array radar, which represents a generational gap compared to the F-15J's outdated mechanically scanned radar. Its detection accuracy and anti-jamming capabilities are incomparable. Although Japan plans to upgrade 98 F-15Js to the "Super Interceptor" standard, replacing them with the AN/APG-82(V)1 active phased array radar, the more serious issue is that the F-15J has an average age of 37.3 years since its entry into service in 1981. More than 60% of the airframes are unable to perform high-intensity air combat missions due to structural fatigue, significantly reducing its actual threat in aerial combat.
Looking at the development trajectory of carrier-based aircraft in China and Japan, the J-15 series is not China's most advanced air combat platform; the superior J-35 stealth carrier-based fighter has been gradually deployed to the armed forces. If these new fighters, possessing both stealth capabilities and beyond-visual-range combat advantages, are deployed in actual combat, the gap in air power between China and Japan may widen further. China's technological accumulation in the aviation industry and its pilots' routine combat-oriented training have jointly built an increasingly solid air power barrier, continuously enhancing its voice on the international military stage.
Japan's attempt to exaggerate the "China threat" by releasing detailed data on the standoff has objectively exposed its proactive provocation—without conducting close-range reconnaissance or provocative flights, it would not have found itself in a passive situation of being locked on from a distance. The backlash from this propaganda maneuver has not only gradually shifted international public opinion in a direction unfavorable to Japan, but has also given China the moral and legal advantage.
For China, this operation is not only a public demonstration of its military technology and combat capabilities, but also sends a clear signal to relevant countries in the region: even when using older models like the J-15, China's military capability to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity remains formidable. This tactical advantage of "detecting the enemy first and firing first," if validated in potential future conflicts, will fundamentally reshape the security landscape of East Asia, forcing relevant countries to reassess their strategies towards China.
This aerial standoff clearly demonstrates that as China's military strength steadily increases, the variables in the regional situation are constantly multiplying. Although Sino-Japanese relations have long been plagued by territorial disputes and historical issues, the gradual emergence of China's technological advantage in air power may force Japan to adopt a more cautious approach in its foreign policy formulation, avoiding uncontrollable consequences from aggressive provocations.
The technological gap and ongoing standoff between Chinese and Japanese air forces have further complicated the regional security situation. The current "Cold War-style" latent confrontation poses both a potential risk of miscalculation leading to conflict and a compelling need for strategic balance. While air combat is a significant manifestation of great power rivalry, it is ultimately just one means of protecting interests. The maintenance of future regional peace and stability depends on whether China and Japan can abandon zero-sum thinking and find common ground and conflict management solutions through dialogue and consultation.
日本披露细节！歼15截获F15距离让人难以置信，这么远就锁住了
这一事件不仅直观暴露了双方空战技术的代际差距，更揭示了东亚地区潜在的军事对抗风险。面对这一态势，日方飞行员虽尝试通过机动动作摆脱锁定，但最终未能成功，进一步印证了歼-15在此次对抗中的绝对技术优势。这种“先敌…
www-sohu-com.translate.goog
muhammed45
Elite Member
Sanae Takaichi is a liberal democrat hence politically a western asset in Japan.
Liberals in Iran always claim that Japan owes its economic and industrial growth/strength to USA. Irony is that these retarded liberals' minds cannot comprehend historical facts of pre-WW2 era.
Japan was an industrial powerhouse and a global military power when it was countering US presence in its respective region. Being an enemy of the US gave Japan a big chance to modernize and improve its industrial and military capabilities.
So, being dependent on the US is not a prelude to economic growth, on the contrary, it makes the country vulnerable to US pressure.
Countries like Germany and Japan never learn, and i wonder why.
Liberals in Iran always claim that Japan owes its economic and industrial growth/strength to USA. Irony is that these retarded liberals' minds cannot comprehend historical facts of pre-WW2 era.
Japan was an industrial powerhouse and a global military power when it was countering US presence in its respective region. Being an enemy of the US gave Japan a big chance to modernize and improve its industrial and military capabilities.
So, being dependent on the US is not a prelude to economic growth, on the contrary, it makes the country vulnerable to US pressure.
Countries like Germany and Japan never learn, and i wonder why.
Viet
VIP Member
You can’t change the people mindsets if they are not willing to.
The Japanese are a different case. They don’t go thru occupation by 4 countries, divided by 4 in the case of Germany. They don’t go thru harsh periods, harsh education. I learned at schools the genocide by the SS, the cruelty of the Nazi. There are harsh penalties for deniers and offenders. Japan is much a Europe country, same same for Singapore.
ety
Trusted Member
Wang Yi: Japan's attempt to stir up trouble over Taiwan is intolerable.
Dezheng Comprehensive Report16 hours ago
Prime Minister Sanae Kaohsiung's remark, "If something happens to Taiwan," triggered a deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations, which subsequently led to the radar illumination incident. Wang Yi expressed strong dissatisfaction on diplomatic occasions.
(Deutsche Welle) Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told visiting German Foreign Minister Waldfol that Japan's "attempt to issue a military threat against China is intolerable," and accused Japan of "ambitions to revive militarism."
German Foreign Minister Karl-Heinz Wadfol visited China this week and met with Wang Yi and other senior Chinese officials on Monday. During the meeting, Wang Yi, in addition to discussing Sino-German relations, the Ukraine war, and emphasizing China's consistent stance on Taiwan, also reiterated his strong criticism of Japan.
Wang Yi specifically mentioned "the erroneous remarks made by the current Japanese leader regarding Taiwan." He told Waldfur, "Unlike Germany, Japan has not thoroughly reflected on its history of aggression even 80 years after the war."
The Chinese Foreign Minister stated, "This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japan. As a defeated nation, Japan should especially reflect deeply on its past actions and be more cautious in its words and deeds. However, it is precisely this country, which colonized Taiwan for 50 years and committed numerous crimes against the Chinese people, whose current leader is attempting to use Taiwan to stir up trouble and threaten China with force. This is intolerable. The Chinese people and all peace-loving peoples of the world have a responsibility to uphold the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and an obligation to prevent Japan from remilitarizing or even attempting to revive militarism."
Japan recently claimed that Chinese fighter jets "illuminated" Japanese military aircraft with radar on December 6, condemning it as a dangerous act. China, in turn, accused Japan of repeatedly sending fighter jets to approach and interfere with the previously announced carrier-based aircraft flight training exercises of the Chinese Navy.
In response to China's statement, Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara reiterated Tokyo's position. At a press conference on Tuesday, he stated that using intermittent radar to illuminate Japanese military aircraft "is a dangerous act that far exceeds the bounds of safety and necessity."
However, Minoru Kihara did not confirm media reports that China refused to answer Japan's hotline calls. Some media reports stated that during the "radar illumination" incident, Beijing did not answer calls from Japan via the bilateral hotline.
Over the past month, Sino-Japanese relations have continued to deteriorate. Previously, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made remarks about "Taiwan being in danger," stating that if China takes military action against Taiwan, it could constitute a "crisis situation for Japan's survival," and Japan could respond militarily.
Viet
VIP Member
You need a different approach.Wang Yi: Japan's attempt to stir up trouble over Taiwan is intolerable.
Dezheng Comprehensive Report
16 hours ago
Prime Minister Sanae Kaohsiung's remark, "If something happens to Taiwan," triggered a deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations, which subsequently led to the radar illumination incident. Wang Yi expressed strong dissatisfaction on diplomatic occasions.
View attachment 164652
In March 2025, Wang Yi met with then-Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya, at a time when Sino-Japanese relations had not yet deteriorated.Image source: POOL Sankei Shimbun/dpa/picture alliance
(Deutsche Welle) Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told visiting German Foreign Minister Waldfol that Japan's "attempt to issue a military threat against China is intolerable," and accused Japan of "ambitions to revive militarism."
German Foreign Minister Karl-Heinz Wadfol visited China this week and met with Wang Yi and other senior Chinese officials on Monday. During the meeting, Wang Yi, in addition to discussing Sino-German relations, the Ukraine war, and emphasizing China's consistent stance on Taiwan, also reiterated his strong criticism of Japan.
Wang Yi specifically mentioned "the erroneous remarks made by the current Japanese leader regarding Taiwan." He told Waldfur, "Unlike Germany, Japan has not thoroughly reflected on its history of aggression even 80 years after the war."
The Chinese Foreign Minister stated, "This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japan. As a defeated nation, Japan should especially reflect deeply on its past actions and be more cautious in its words and deeds. However, it is precisely this country, which colonized Taiwan for 50 years and committed numerous crimes against the Chinese people, whose current leader is attempting to use Taiwan to stir up trouble and threaten China with force. This is intolerable. The Chinese people and all peace-loving peoples of the world have a responsibility to uphold the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and an obligation to prevent Japan from remilitarizing or even attempting to revive militarism."
Japan recently claimed that Chinese fighter jets "illuminated" Japanese military aircraft with radar on December 6, condemning it as a dangerous act. China, in turn, accused Japan of repeatedly sending fighter jets to approach and interfere with the previously announced carrier-based aircraft flight training exercises of the Chinese Navy.
In response to China's statement, Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara reiterated Tokyo's position. At a press conference on Tuesday, he stated that using intermittent radar to illuminate Japanese military aircraft "is a dangerous act that far exceeds the bounds of safety and necessity."
However, Minoru Kihara did not confirm media reports that China refused to answer Japan's hotline calls. Some media reports stated that during the "radar illumination" incident, Beijing did not answer calls from Japan via the bilateral hotline.
Over the past month, Sino-Japanese relations have continued to deteriorate. Previously, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made remarks about "Taiwan being in danger," stating that if China takes military action against Taiwan, it could constitute a "crisis situation for Japan's survival," and Japan could respond militarily.
The problem is the Chinese treat the Japanese like they treat the Vietnamese or Koreans. That’s totally misguided. The Japanese are much like let’s say the English. Ccp can call on Japan to respect history is like calling someone in a desert. Nobody hears you.
ety
Trusted Member
I think many Chinese have delusions about Japan and Japanese simply because they look quite like Chinese and imported Japanese writing and many Japanese cultures, maybe about 50%, from China. But, they maybe still savages at heart if not caged now. Yes, both these two people are insidious island people.
Last edited:
muhammed45
Elite Member
You are right, they have somehow turned LoLocasut into some kind of religion. Its the redline that is not to be crossed at any cost. (How to control people)
When you ask them, dude, killing 6 million people in 1 country is out of reach for most global powers conventionally and its just an exaggeration even if we accept Haavara was just a simple deal, they respond like this : ok, maybe exaggeration but you have to accept what we tell you, don't ask why. For trillions of evidence that exists and we show you just a couple of them, for example.
Molotov-Ribbentrop was a good chance to look eastwards in case of Germany but it became a cover for future invasion of USSR. Red army was composed of a division called inevitable bastards in our culture, they were born out of forced pregnancy of poor Slav women who had no role in creation of that bastard army. What do you expect them to do after occupation of Germany? Problem is, Germany is currently supporting the Zionist animals.
Solution is not supporting an other savage to compensate an other problem. Not to mention that Israel is just a military base of USA. Thinking that Israel is an independent worm in west of Asia is misguiding. USA is successor of every savage and the way out of these miseries is to defy the source of savagery.
Last edited:
wangdefa
Registered Member
The arrogance of peacetime is useless in front of Gears of War. Now we have put warships in front of them, and even step by step, why did the Japanese retreat? I still like their usual arrogant appearance, so that they can make bigger mistakes. We need an excuse to teach Japan a lesson.Japanese report reveals details! The distance at which the J-15 intercepted the F-15 is unbelievable; it locked onto it from such a distance.
2025-12-10 10:42
Published in: Shanxi Province
Amidst escalating international tensions, the direct confrontation between the air forces of China and Japan is becoming a focal point of global geopolitical attention. A key military data recently disclosed by Japan's NHK has sent shockwaves through the defense sector: a Chinese J-15 carrier-based fighter jet achieved radar lock-on at a distance of 148 kilometers during an aerial confrontation with a Japanese Air Self-Defense Force F-15J fighter jet. This incident not only starkly exposes the generational gap in air combat technology between the two sides but also reveals the potential risks of military confrontation in East Asia.
Behind the J-15's beyond-visual-range (BVR) combat advantages, its 148-kilometer radar illumination range is a key highlight—a distance exceeding the effective detection range of the F-15J. This means the J-15 can achieve the tactical advantage of "detecting and locking onto the enemy first," launching attacks without prior enemy detection. In contrast, the F-15J's current mainstay AN/APG-63(V)1 planar slotted radar has a maximum detection range of only 160 kilometers, and its detection range against fighter-type targets is further reduced to 120 kilometers. This technological gap signifies significant progress made by the Chinese Naval Aviation in the field of BVR combat.
A report released by the Japanese Ministry of Defense indicates that during this standoff, the J-15 locked onto an F-15J at a distance of 52 kilometers for the first time, maintaining the lock for three minutes. It then conducted a 31-minute radar illumination operation within a beyond-visual-range range of 148 kilometers. Faced with this situation, the Japanese pilot attempted to break the lock through maneuvers but ultimately failed, further confirming the J-15's absolute technological superiority in this confrontation.
The J-15T fighter jet currently in mass production and service is equipped with an advanced gallium nitride active phased array radar, which represents a generational gap compared to the F-15J's outdated mechanically scanned radar. Its detection accuracy and anti-jamming capabilities are incomparable. Although Japan plans to upgrade 98 F-15Js to the "Super Interceptor" standard, replacing them with the AN/APG-82(V)1 active phased array radar, the more serious issue is that the F-15J has an average age of 37.3 years since its entry into service in 1981. More than 60% of the airframes are unable to perform high-intensity air combat missions due to structural fatigue, significantly reducing its actual threat in aerial combat.
Looking at the development trajectory of carrier-based aircraft in China and Japan, the J-15 series is not China's most advanced air combat platform; the superior J-35 stealth carrier-based fighter has been gradually deployed to the armed forces. If these new fighters, possessing both stealth capabilities and beyond-visual-range combat advantages, are deployed in actual combat, the gap in air power between China and Japan may widen further. China's technological accumulation in the aviation industry and its pilots' routine combat-oriented training have jointly built an increasingly solid air power barrier, continuously enhancing its voice on the international military stage.
Japan's attempt to exaggerate the "China threat" by releasing detailed data on the standoff has objectively exposed its proactive provocation—without conducting close-range reconnaissance or provocative flights, it would not have found itself in a passive situation of being locked on from a distance. The backlash from this propaganda maneuver has not only gradually shifted international public opinion in a direction unfavorable to Japan, but has also given China the moral and legal advantage.
For China, this operation is not only a public demonstration of its military technology and combat capabilities, but also sends a clear signal to relevant countries in the region: even when using older models like the J-15, China's military capability to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity remains formidable. This tactical advantage of "detecting the enemy first and firing first," if validated in potential future conflicts, will fundamentally reshape the security landscape of East Asia, forcing relevant countries to reassess their strategies towards China.
This aerial standoff clearly demonstrates that as China's military strength steadily increases, the variables in the regional situation are constantly multiplying. Although Sino-Japanese relations have long been plagued by territorial disputes and historical issues, the gradual emergence of China's technological advantage in air power may force Japan to adopt a more cautious approach in its foreign policy formulation, avoiding uncontrollable consequences from aggressive provocations.
The technological gap and ongoing standoff between Chinese and Japanese air forces have further complicated the regional security situation. The current "Cold War-style" latent confrontation poses both a potential risk of miscalculation leading to conflict and a compelling need for strategic balance. While air combat is a significant manifestation of great power rivalry, it is ultimately just one means of protecting interests. The maintenance of future regional peace and stability depends on whether China and Japan can abandon zero-sum thinking and find common ground and conflict management solutions through dialogue and consultation.
日本披露细节！歼15截获F15距离让人难以置信，这么远就锁住了
这一事件不仅直观暴露了双方空战技术的代际差距，更揭示了东亚地区潜在的军事对抗风险。面对这一态势，日方飞行员虽尝试通过机动动作摆脱锁定，但最终未能成功，进一步印证了歼-15在此次对抗中的绝对技术优势。这种“先敌…
ety
Trusted Member
Lol, what's the fuss with the Japanese ? That's what they were Wokou, 倭寇。
Weiwei loves eating melons focus on
The Chinese ambassador to Japan posted a message referring to Japan as "Wokou" (Japanese pirates), causing a complete uproar in Japan!
This seemingly ordinary historical post became the spark that ignited public opinion in Japan.
The post from the Chinese embassy in Japan included an illustration of a stone wall in Chuanhu Village, Fujian, and stated that "the coastal areas of Fujian during the Ming Dynasty were repeatedly attacked by Wokou." Who could have imagined that this would cause such a collective "all-out reaction" in Japanese politics and online?
Let's look at the reaction from Japanese media. The traditionally right-leaning Sankei Shimbun immediately published an article accusing China of "inciting nationalism."
The Liberal Democratic Party's Foreign Affairs Research Committee was also busy, holding an emergency meeting, with the pro-Japanese collaborator Shi Ping leading the submission of a resolution demanding that China apologize and retract its statement.
The topic of "Wokou" sparked a sustained high level of discussion on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter)
中国驻日大使发文称日本为倭寇...@蔚蔚爱吃瓜的动态
mbd.baidu.com
Last edited:
