Indian Missiles and Guided Munitions

Some education

Where and how different versions of Brahmos are designed and built for over a decade
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Remember this is a nation that sends satalites into space into space for decades on Indian rockets

These Indians have millions graduating in engineering and science each year.. India is a tech giant now


The of missile Brahmos combines name of two rivers, "the Brahmputra river"+ "the Moscow river' of SU's Capital. It's a joint honour of these two countries on the world platform.

This missile was rated on first place than any other missile of world during a period of time. The customers of Brahmos get this defence without any sting attached, similar to other NATO's arms 👍
 
same logic, India has every reason to be
You're not meant to use the same logic as Pakistan. Your overwhelming economic might and supertech intelligence is meant to overwhelm Pakistan.

Maybe you need that 20 trillion economy
 
You're not meant to use the same logic as Pakistan. Your overwhelming economic might and supertech intelligence is meant to overwhelm Pakistan.

Maybe you need that 20 trillion economy
Overwhelming economic power does not mean to overinvest in defense.

BrahMos has achieved a high level of indigenization, with electronics and guidance systems about 90–95% Indian and the overall missile around 83–85% Indian. Almost all critical components are now indigenous, except for the ramjet engine, which remains of russian origin.

Indian parts
Seeker (guidance head) – Indian RF seeker (DRDO)
Mission computer & control electronics
Inertial Navigation System (INS) (NavIC/GPS aided)
Guidance software & ECCM
Airframe, fins & composites
All launcher systems (land, sea, air)
Warhead integration & fuze
 
Overwhelming economic power does not mean to overinvest in defense.
Welcome to the PDF consensus, you took your time but you got there


Well done for reversing the last narrative for the last decade as well from India

BrahMos has achieved a high level of indigenization

The air battle comma which Pakistan successfully dominated arguably had far more indigenization across different areas. You just have one missile you talk about.
 
Welcome to the PDF consensus, you took your time but you got there


Well done for reversing the last narrative for the last decade as well from India



The air battle comma which Pakistan successfully dominated arguably had far more indigenization across different areas. You just have one missile you talk about.
I am very much different from your opinion!

It was a win and a loss for both—for example, the IAF did much better than the PAF on striking at targets on grounds with accuracy.

I don't see war won by anyone—output was mixed for both.
 
I am very much different from your opinion!

It was a win and a loss for both—for example, the IAF did much better than the PAF on striking at targets on grounds with accuracy.

I don't see war won by anyone—output was mixed for both.
This was an act that you started, and you lost your best fighter jets.

You see suddenly, India has no standards, it is only the paf who is standing tall with a stronger global reputation, India should be thanked to give the opportunity.
 
This was an act that you started, and you lost your best fighter jets.

You see suddenly, India has no standards, it is only the paf who is standing tall with a stronger global reputation, India should be thanked to give the opportunity.
This discussion is pointless. No one clearly won—both sides experienced successes and failures. With over 11 airbases And radars hit, no side can credibly claim victory. Likewise, the loss of IAF aircrafts prevents any absolute claim on the other side. The reality is simple: both sides believe they won and will continue to say so. There is nothing to be gained from debating it further.. i am out of this
 
Last edited:
Thats like saying, the JF17 is based on FC1 but its 100% pakistani. Blind patriotism has made indians into pathological liars.
It isn't. You use Russian Engines, on a Chinese frame, with Chinese missiles, Chinese AESA. For Brahmos India makes the current seeker, solid booster, hardwares and softwares. Russian components are the alloys in mid course liquid propulsion system that can withstand extreme heat. Something only countries that make jet engines can master. That's the point of the Brahmos JV.
 
News floating on "Social Media" about Indian SLBM test.
Started by Shiv Arur
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You Pakistanis have a habit of down playing anything remotely Indian in origin
Be it economic might
Gdp growth
Space programme
Brain exports to USA

The reality is china and India dominate USA tech market for decades now they aim.to keep the engineers and science minds back at home


No matter how you down play it India is a tech giant

Put it this way Indian IT Technology exports makes India about 200 billion dollars a year

Not bad

There will huge range hypersonic weapons coming out of I dial next five to ten years and nobody can defend against Mach 8 precision strikes by Stealth missiles

You were totally helpless against ten year old brahmos Mach 3 missles...complete defenceless

India knows this now
I merely posted "few" headlines.. why are you riled up?
 
@PakSword

A 2021 NASSCOM study found that only 1.5% of Indian engineers can write functionally correct code.

Well with just 1.5% capable engineers, Indian code coolies are exporting USD 200 bn IT services. They are displacing white workers enmasse in USA as @r3alist bro and @Meengla sb keep lamenting. What if that % bumped up to 15% from 1.5%.

Regards
When you consider call centers the software houses...

Anyway, I have worked in 6 countries in my 23 years of career.. I know the ratio of good Indian workers is approx.. 10%, not 1.5%.

Also, I don't hate Indians.. I have many Indian colleagues, some are exceptional talents and I respect them. However, mostly they are progressive types, not the hindutva turds. Good thing about good Indians is that they respect talent, whether it is from Pakistan or Bangladesh or India.. Bad thing about bad hindutva Indians is that they bring whatever crap they find from their own kind if and when they occupy position of power.

One of them I am after at the moment....
 
It isn't. You use Russian Engines, on a Chinese frame, with Chinese missiles, Chinese AESA. For Brahmos India makes the current seeker, solid booster, hardwares and softwares. Russian components are the alloys in mid course liquid propulsion system that can withstand extreme heat. Something only countries that make jet engines can master. That's the point of the Brahmos JV.
What you are really trying to justify is why India is not producing its own indigenous weapons, yet Pakistan has functional credible deterrence across all theatres.

When it suits, you benchmark to Pakistan.
The path Pakistan has taken for military procurement is commensurate to the size of the country, and relative to the resources you would have to agree they are punching above their weight.

Now if you consider your 4 trillion economy, yet here you are trying to justify joint ventures and requests for technology transfers
......that's only on India.

It's obviously on India that they could not develop their own capabilities, but then it's also an India that they choose to benchmark to Pakistan.

Remember China you have already raised the white flag
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top