Japan Defence and General News Discussions

[ety]

That’s China interpretation. You can argue that way or other way. But not everyone follows your interpretation. I read your post I read UN charter full text.

Lol, no country is disputing the validity of China's quoting of the UN's enemy clause that includes Germany, Japan and Italy, except you and few pro-Japan self-claimed pundits. So, you think the world should instead follow your twisted interpretation of UN charter regarding the enemy states ? Or just whatever comes out your mouth, you think you have more credibility on the subject ? Lol.

 

[Viet]

Lol, no country is disputing the validity of China's quoting of the UN's enemy clause that includes Germany, Japan and Italy, except you and few pro-Japan self-claimed pundits. So, you think the world should instead follow your twisted interpretation of UN charter regarding the enemy states ? Or just whatever comes out your mouth, you think you have more credibility on the subject ? Lol.

Ah nonsense
I am just a neutral observer.
I had some legal lessons in school and universities.
As for Japan do what you like.
From Vietnam point view only 3 countries in the immediate borders matter: China, Laos and Cambodia, the rest is second tier or third tier or we don’t care.

 

[ety]

Ah nonsense
I am just a neutral observer.
I had some legal lessons in school and universities.
As for Japan do what you like.
From Vietnam point view only 3 countries in the immediate borders matter: China, Laos and Cambodia, the rest is second tier or third tier or we don’t care.

You are obviously pro Germany and Japan on the subject and some others.

 

[Viet]

You are obviously pro Germany and Japan on the subject and some others.

Yes I am pro Ukraine, too. What’s your point? I am concerned of extremists in general. the way Ccp pursues nationalism is not good.
Germany militarization is not a threat to Europe, Japan not to Asia because the maths don’t add up. Only some few in Russia and China. That’s the reality.

 

[ety]

Yes I am pro Ukraine, too. What’s your point? I am concerned of extremists in general. the way Ccp pursues nationalism is not good.
Germany militarization is not a threat to Europe, Japan not to Asia because the maths don’t add up. Only some few in Russia and China. That’s the reality.

UN Charter​

Article 53​

1. The Security Council shall, where appropriate, utilize such regional arrangements or agencies for enforcement action under its authority. But no enforcement action shall be taken under regional arrangements or by regional agencies without the authorization of the Security Council, with the exception of measures against any enemy state, as defined in paragraph 2 of this Article, provided for pursuant to Article 107 or in regional arrangements directed against renewal of aggressive policy on the part of any such state, until such time as the Organization may, on request of the Governments concerned, be charged with the responsibility for preventing further aggression by such a state.
2. The term enemy state as used in paragraph 1 of this Article applies to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory of the present Charter.

• Is this pretty clear that countries such Germany an d Japan are enemy states ? These two countries should be strictly limited in militarization and kept caged. They continue to be menace to world peace no doubt. Yeah, I hope Japan carries out another brutal invasion and occupation of Vietnam like in WW II in the near future, see what you have to say then.

 

[Viet]

UN Charter​

Article 53​

1. The Security Council shall, where appropriate, utilize such regional arrangements or agencies for enforcement action under its authority. But no enforcement action shall be taken under regional arrangements or by regional agencies without the authorization of the Security Council, with the exception of measures against any enemy state, as defined in paragraph 2 of this Article, provided for pursuant to Article 107 or in regional arrangements directed against renewal of aggressive policy on the part of any such state, until such time as the Organization may, on request of the Governments concerned, be charged with the responsibility for preventing further aggression by such a state.
2. The term enemy state as used in paragraph 1 of this Article applies to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory of the present Charter.

• Is this pretty clear that countries such Germany an d Japan are enemy states ? These two countries should be strictly limited in militarization and kept caged. They continue to be menace to world peace no doubt. Yeah, I hope Japan carries out another brutal invasion and occupation of Vietnam like in WW II in the near future, see what you have to say then.

You don’t see the flaw?

Article 53 refers to article 2 with “way of action” in article 107. The term “enemy states” in turn refer to the declaration of allies in WW2 and signatories of UN charter of present version. In no place in document, so in legal term Japan, Germany are not as enemy states.

If you want to confuse people then that’s the best way to do.

 

[ety]

You don’t see the flaw?
Article 53 refers to article 2 with way of action in article 107. However Japan, Germany are not cited as enemy states.

Lol, it's clear that states fought against the signatory members of UN at the founding in WW II are enemy states of UN that obviously include Germany, Japan and Italy, everyone knows what these countries did in WW II. Or, then which countries are the enemy statement directed at ? Or in your opinion against nobody because no country name is explicitly mentioned, laughable. You may have problem with this English text reading.

UN was formed based on the results of WW II. What make you think that Germany, Japan and Italy that started the war should not be classified as enemy states of UN, it's only logical.

 

[Viet]

Lol, it's clear that states fought against the signatory members of UN at the founding in WW II are enemy states of UN that obviously include Germany, Japan and Italy, everyone knows what these countries did in WW II. Or, then which countries are the enemy statement directed at ? Or in your opinion against nobody because no country name is explicitly mentioned, laughable. You may have problem with this English text reading.

If everyone knows it, why not writing into the UN text? But so as it is there is room for interpretation.

 

[ety]

If everyone knows it, why not writing into the UN text? But so as it is there is room for interpretation.

There is no other logical interpretation, the article is not intended to direct just at the air, meaning nothing. This is the art of writing they choose to use. It's futile for you to defend the evil Japan and Germany, even these two countries don't deny the enemy states clause refer to them.

 

[Viet]

There is no other logical interpretation, the article is not intended to direct just at the air, meaning nothing. This is the art of writing they choose to use. It's futile for you to defend the evil Japan and Germany, even these two countries don't deny the enemy states clause refer to them.

Not only me
The UN general assembly approved to ignore and delete the term “enemy states” in 1995.

 

[ety]

Not only me
The UN general assembly approved to ignore and delete the term “enemy states” in 1995.

It wasn't approved by the security council, general assembly votes meant nothing, so you see the enemy states articles still in the UN Charter now and they are still valid. No country comes out against China wanting to invoke the enemy clause against Japan this time except Japan. It means countries still approve the articles as valid now. Decades before 1995, Japan and Germany were hiding their true motives well, pretending well to be good pacifist countries for some time, so the general assembly votes, people got fooled until recently.

 

[Viet]

It wasn't approved by the security council, general assembly votes meant nothing, so you see the enemy states articles still in the UN Charter now and they are still valid. No country comes out against China wanting to invoke the enemy clause against Japan this time except Japan. it means countries still approve the articles as valid now.

Yes still valid
Any of P5 can veto so China in the case of Japan
The bottom line any great power can do what they want.
If Putin starts a war tomorrow against Poland or the US invading Venezuela or Greenland or Canada you think Trump or Putin care of?

 

[Michael]

Guys. It is pointless to discuss these topics under completely different historical, educational, and cultural backgrounds.

 

[Foinikas]

The Eastern Theater Command released a major themed poster, "The Great Sword: Sacrifice," symbolizing the resolute severing of filthy heads.​

Reprinted from: Beijing Daily Client


December 13, 1937


Nanjing fell into the clutches of the Japanese invaders


300,000 compatriots were brutally massacred.


88 years have passed


The blood of the fallen heroes has not yet congealed.


The specter of militarism has returned.


The annual National Memorial Day


Sound the alarm


A reminder to us—


Always holding the Blood Sacrifice Great sword high


Firmly cut off the filthy head


Militarism must never be allowed to make a comeback.


We must never allow history to repeat itself.


Today, the Eastern Theater Command issued a statement.


A major themed poster for "The Great Sword: Sacrifice"

(Poster design: Xianrui, Wenlong, Daiqiang)

Seven-Character Quatrain: Great Sword Sacrifice


The Japanese pirates wreaked havoc for nearly a thousand years.


The blood feud is still fresh in my mind.


Unrighteous, fearful of power, and wicked in heart, fighting.


The long sword quelled the smoke of war wherever it pointed.


——2025.12.13


Source: Eastern Theater Command

东部战区发布重磅主题海报《大刀·祭》：坚决斩断肮脏头颅

东部战区发布重磅主题海报《大刀·祭》：坚决斩断肮脏头颅

finance-sina-com-cn.translate.goog

The world remembers Nanjing. Condolences.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Can you two NOT ruin this thread?

 

[ety]

Can you two NOT ruin this thread?

What's wrong with my thread, lol, they should take up what they did. Really hurt the butt of Japan licker eh.